Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:41:17.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vera, Politics, and Reform

Review products

McDonald Douglas Corry. Punishment Without Walls: Community Service Sentences in New York City. (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1986). xix + 278 pp. Notes, index. $30.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Roy B. Flemming
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , 1988 , pp. 817 - 820
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

The guilty plea process mixes consensus and concessions with going rates structuring but not determining negotiations when they occur. The imprecision of McDonald's (p. 259) remark that “the exact proportion of . . . pleas that were negotiated is not easy to discern, but it is undoubtedly very high” cannot be ignored when he discusses his “battle model.” See Nardulli et al. (1984; 1985) for a quantitative assessment of individual influences on the guilty plea process and an effort to operationalize the going rate concept.

References

BLUMBERG, Abraham (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
NARDULLI, Peter F., FLEMMING, Roy B., and James, EISENSTEIN (1984) “Unravelling the Complexities of Decision Making in Face-to-Face Groups: A Contextual Analysis of Plea-Bargained Sentences,” 78 American Political Science Review 912.Google Scholar
NARDULLI, Peter F., FLEMMING, Roy B., and James, EISENSTEIN (1985) “Criminal Courts and Bureaucratic Justice: Concessions and Consensus in the Guilty Plea Process,” 74 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1103.Google Scholar