Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-zh294 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T09:10:58.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Judicial Hierarchy: Reversals and the Behavior of Intermediate Appellate Judges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Kevin M. Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the central controversies in the judicial behavior literature is the extent to which judges' ability to act according to their ideological preferences is affected by their location in the judicial hierarchy. Judges on intermediate appellate courts have different decisionmaking environments than high court judges. As a result, the goals of lower appellate court judges may differ from those of their superiors: the quest for legal accuracy may compete with the desire to pursue policy preferences. Analysis of the reversal rate of the U.S. circuit courts of appeals offers insight into the extent to which these judges balance the pressures of their own policy preferences with the desire to achieve the legally accurate result in cases they decide.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 163 - 192
Copyright
© 2006 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This article was originally presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. I would like to thank Christopher Banks, Larry Baum, Chris Bonneau, Rhonda Evans Case, Lori Hausegger, Micheal Giles, Steve Wasby, and Margaret Williams for their comments and advice. I would also like to thank Michael Bailey for his advice on data analysis.

References

Abe, Masaki (1995) “The Internal Control of a Bureaucratic Judiciary: The Case of Japan,” 23 International J. of the Sociology of Law 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (1983, 1985, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002) Federal Court Management Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Atkins, Burton (1990) “Interventions and Power in Judicial Hierarchies: Appellate Courts in England and the United States,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Burton (1993) “Alternative Models of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies,” 37 American J. of Political Science 780–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael, & Chang, Kelly (2001) “Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices: Interinstitutional Preference Estimation,” 17 J. of Law, Economics, and Organization 477–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Thomas E. (1994) Rationing Justice on Appeal: Problems of the US Court of Appeals. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1997) The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, & Katz, Jonathan N. (1995) “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data,” 89 American Political Science Rev. 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel (2004) “Time-Series Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, 2004.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., et al. (1999) “Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court,” 15 J. of Law, Economics, and Organization 549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, et al. (2000) “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions,” 43 American Political Science Rev. 162–85.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. (2003) “Decisionmaking in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals,” 91 California Law Rev. 1457–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Frank B., & Tiller, Emerson H. (1998) “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals,” 107 Yale Law J. 2155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, et al. (2003) “The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court,” 91 California Law Rev. 903–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Roy B. (2004) Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., & Krutz, Glen S. (2002) “Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication and Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses,” 64 J. of Politics 232–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Tracey E. (1999) “The Dynamics and Determinants of the Decision to Grant En Banc Review,” 74 Washington Law Rev. 213–74.Google Scholar
George, Tracey E., & Solimine, Michael E. (2001) “Supreme Court Monitoring of the United States Court of Appeals En Banc,” 9 Supreme Court Economic Rev. 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., et al. (2001) “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas,” 54 Political Research Q. 623–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom (2003) Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1966) “Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961–1964,” 60 American Political Science Rev. 374–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1975) “Voting Behavior on the United States Court of Appeals Revisited,” 69 American Political Science Rev. 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1997) Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Ian, et al. (1998) Final Appeal: Decision-Making in Canadian Courts of Appeal. Toronto: James Lorimer.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo, & Pederzoli, Patrizia (2002) The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy, Ed. in English Thomas, C. A. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan, et al. (2001) “Hierarchical Relationships in the Federal Courts.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Hellman, Arthur D. (1984) “Granted, Vacated, and Remanded: Shedding Light on a Dark Corner of Supreme Court Practice,” 67 Judicature 389–401.Google Scholar
Hellman, Arthur D. (2000) “Getting It Right: Panel Error and the En Banc Process in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,” 34 University of California, Davis Law Rev. 425–69.Google Scholar
Hellman, Arthur D. (2003a) “Assessing Judgeship Needs in the Federal Courts of Appeals: Policy Choices and Process Concerns,” 5 J. of Appellate Practice and Process 239–70.Google Scholar
Hellman, Arthur D. (2003b) Statement in Hearing on HR 2723, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2003. 108th Cong., 1st sess., 21 October. http://www.house.gov/judiciary/90125.PDF (accessed 27 March 2004).Google Scholar
Herald, Marybeth (1998) “Reversed, Vacated and Split: The Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit, and Congress,” 77 Oregon Law Rev. 405–96.Google Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., et al. (2003) “Acclimation Effects and Separate Opinion Writing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 84 Social Science Q. 792–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A. (2004) “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 48 American J. of Political Science 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2004) Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng (2003) Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David E. (2002) Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David E., & Hume, Robert J. (2003) “Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1995) “Adjudication by a Resource-Constrained Team: Hierarchy and Precedent in a Judicial System,” 65 Southern California Law Rev. 1605–28.Google Scholar
Kozinski, Alex (2003) Statement in Hearing on HR 2723, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2003. 108th Cong., 1st sess., 21 October. http://www.house.gov/judiciary/90125.PDF (accessed 27 March 2004).Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., & Quinn, Kevin M. (2002) “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999,” 10 Political Analysis 134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Peter (1992) “The Supervisory Role of the Supreme Court of Canada: Analysis of Appeals from Provincial Courts of Appeal, 1949–1990,” 3 Supreme Court Law Rev. 1–28.Google Scholar
McCormick, Peter (2000) Supreme at Last: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: James Lorimer.Google Scholar
Mikulski, Barbara (2003) “Senator Barbara Mikulski Opposes Nomination of Virginia Judge to Maryland Seat on 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.” http://mikulski.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=214117 (accessed 15 September 2004).Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr. (1991) Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, Jason (2002) “Judicial Entrepreneurism and the Politics of Institutional Change: An Analysis of the Recent Judicial Role Transformation in the High Court of Australia.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1996) The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (2000) “Is the Ninth Circuit Too Large? A Statistical Study of Judicial Quality,” 29 J. of Legal Studies 711–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie (1980) Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salzberger, Eli, & Fenn, Paul (1999) “Judicial Independence: Some Evidence from the English Court of Appeal,” 42 J. of Law and Economics 831–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin (1998) Submitted Testimony to the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals. http://www.library.unt.edu/gpo/csafca/hearings/submitted/pdf/Scalia1.pdf(accessed 25 July 2004).Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1997) “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and the Courts,” 91 American Political Science Rev. 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Cover, Albert D. (1989) “Ideological Values and the Votes of US Supreme Court Justices,” 83 American Political Science Rev. 557–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Spaeth, Harold J. (2002) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, & Sweet, Alec Stone (2002) On Law, Politics and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R., et al. (1994) “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions,” 36 American J. of Political Science 673–96.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J. (2003) “Original United States Supreme Court Database (1953-2002 Terms).” http://www.as.uky.edu/polisci/ulmerproject/Setdata.htm (accessed 13 October 2005).Google Scholar
Spitzer, Matt, & Talley, Eric (2000) “Judicial Auditing,” 29 J. of Legal Studies 649–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (2000) Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Tate C., & Vallinder, Torbjörn, eds. (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Winkle, Steven R. (1996) “Three-Judge Panels and Strategic Behavior on the US Courts of Appeals.” Presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
Volcansek, Mary L. (2000) Constitutional Politics in Italy: The Constitutional Court. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wahlbeck, Paul J., et al. (1998) “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court,” 42 American J. of Political Science 294–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. (1998) “The Ninth Circuit and the Supreme Court: Relations Between Higher and Lower Courts.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. (2001) “The Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals En Bancs,” 33 McGeorge Law Rev. 17–73.Google Scholar
Zorn, Christopher J. W. (2001) “Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications,” 45 American J. of Political Science 470–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar