Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:24:02.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Stock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Richard L. Abel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This collection, which brings together critical reviews of the literature on a variety of contemporary issues in law and social science, has its origins in two judgments about our field that may appear contradictory but in fact are complementary. On the one hand, the empirical data and generalizations produced during the last several decades seem to call for, and amply to deserve, compilation and summary of the kind often found in propositional inventories. But at the same time recent scholarship often seems stagnant, further documentation (or falsification) of a well-established (or generally discredited) hypothesis, one more entry in a sterile, and ultimately unresolvable, theoretical debate—a by-product of the demands of tenure-review committees rather than the expression of any real intellectual engagement. If this judgment is fair, reflective and critical reassessment of the field is essential to break the hold of existing preoccupations and to formulate new questions. These dual motives will be apparent throughout this volume. Here I will offer my view of the kind of reappraisal that is needed, explain how the topics and authors were selected, and suggest some of the ways in which the essays that follow contribute to the task.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 14 , Issue 3: Contemporary Issues in Law and Social Science , Spring 1980 , pp. 429 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

The material in this volume is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SOC 77-13266. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

H. Laurence Ross, director of the Law and Social Science Program when the grant was made, was extraordinarily helpful and supportive throughout, as have been his successors, Stephen L. Wasby and Felice Levine, and the directors of the Division of Social and Economic Science, Herbert Costner and B.W. Rubinstein. I also want to express my gratitude to all those who contributed to this project by proposing topics and participating in the selection process.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
ARNAUD, A.J.A. (1976) “Bibliographic des travaux recents de sociologie juridique en langue françhise,” 3 Sociologia del diritto 566.Google Scholar
ARNAUD, A.J.A. (1977) “Nouvelles de France,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 555.Google Scholar
AUBERT, Vilhelm (1968) Rettssosiologi. Oslo: Universitets Forlag.Google Scholar
BARONTI, Giancarlo and Tamar, PITCH (1978) “Sociology of Law and the Problematic of the Social Sciences in Italy,” 12 Law & Society Review 665.Google Scholar
BEIRNE, Piers (1979) “Ideology and Rationality in Max Weber's Sociology of Law,” 2 Research in Law and Sociology 103.Google Scholar
BEIRNE, Piers and R., SHARLET (eds.) (1979) Pashukanis: Selected Writings on Marxism and Law (P. Maggs, trans.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald and Maureen, MILESKI (eds.) (1973) The Social Organization of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen and Alan, HUNT (1979) Marx and Engels on Law. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, CM. (1977) “Recent Research in Sociology of Law in Britain,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 277.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, CM. and Paul, WILES (1976) “The Study of Law in Society in Britain,” 10 Law & Society Review 547.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, CM. and Paul, WILES (eds.) (1979) Law and Society: Readings in the Sociology of Law. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
CARBONNIER, Jean (1972) Sociologie juridique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
COLLIER, Jane F. (1975) “Legal Anthropology,” in Siegel, B.J. (ed.) Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 4. Palo Alto, Calif: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
DIAZ, E. (1978) “Bibliographie de Sociologie Juridique en Espagne,” 5 Sociologia del diritto 253.Google Scholar
EDER, Klaus (1977) “Rationalist and Normative Approaches to the Sociological Study of Law,” 12 Law & Society Review 133.Google Scholar
EVAN, William M. (ed.) (1980) The Sociology of Law: A Social-Structural Perspective. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
FARRINGTON, David P., Keith, HAWKINS and Sally M., LLOYD-BOSTOCK (eds.) (1979) Psychology, Law and Legal Processes. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1973) A History of American Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1975) The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. and Stewart, MACAULAY (1977) Law and the Behavioral Sciences (2d ed.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1975) “Afterword: Explaining Litigation,” 9 Law & Society Review 347.Google Scholar
GÓRECKI, Jan (ed.) (1975) Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John (1974) “Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint,” 8 Law & Society Review 357.Google Scholar
HIRSCH, Werner Z. (1979) Law and Economics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HUNT, Alan (1978) The Sociological Movement in Law. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOJDER, A. (1978) “Sociology of Law in Poland: Selected Bibliography,” 5 Sociologia del diritto 529.Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1976) “Delivery of Legal Services,” 11(2) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1979) “Plea Bargaining,” 13(2) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1972) Rechtssoziologie, 2 volumes. Reinbeck.Google Scholar
LUKES, Steven and Andrew, SCULL (1980) Durkheim and the Law. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
MOHR, Lawrence B. (1976) “Organizations, Decisions, and Courts,” 10 Law & Society Review 621.Google Scholar
MOLLNAU, K.A. (1977) “Sociology of Law in the German Democratic Republic,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 294.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1969) “Law and Anthropology,” in Siegel, B.J. (ed.) Biennial Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto, Calif: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Perspective. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1965) “The Anthropological Study of Law,” 67(6) (pt. 2) American Anthropologist 3 (Special Issue).Google Scholar
NADER, Laura and Harry F., TODD Jr. (eds.) (1978) The Disputing Process-Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NADER, Laura and Barbara C., YNGVESSON (1973) “On Studying the Ethnography of Law and Its Consequences,” in Honigmann, John J. (ed.) Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
PALEN, Frank S. (1979) “Media Ombudsmen: A Critical Review,” 13 Law & Society Review 799.Google Scholar
PARSONS, Talcott (1977) Review of Unger, Law in Modem Society, 12 Law & Society Review 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PASHUKANIS, E.B. (1978) The General Theory of Law and Marxism (C. Arthur ed.). London: Ink Links.Google Scholar
PETRA$ZdYCKI, Leon (1955) Law and Morality (trans. E.W. Babb). Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PODGÓRECKI, Adam (1974) Law and Society. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
POPESCU, S. (1977) “Sociologie juridique et sciences juridiques dans la République socialiste de Roumanie,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 288.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1977) Economic Analysis of Law (2d ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
POSPISIL, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
REASONS, Charles E. and Robert M., RICH (eds.) (1978) The Sociology of Law: A Conflict Perspective. Toronto: Butterworth.Google Scholar
SALES, Bruce Dennis (ed.) (1977) Psychology in the Legal Process, New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1977) “Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence,” 11 Law & Society Review 427.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D. and Jerome H., SKOLNICK (eds.) (1970) Society and the Legal Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
SOUTO, C. (1977) “Socio-Legal Research Activity in Brasil,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 292.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur L. (1977) Review of Friedman, The Legal System and Black, The Behavior of Law, 12 Law & Society Review 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STJERNQUIST, Per (1977) “Sociology of Law in Sweden,” 4 Sociologia del diritto 543.Google Scholar
TAPP, June Louin and Felice J., LEVINE (eds.) (1977) Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
TREVES, Renato (1975) “Recenti ricerche di sociologia del diritto in Spagna,” 2 Sociologia del diritto 411.Google Scholar
TREVES, Renato (1977) Introduzione alia sociologia del diritto. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David M. (1972) “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Review 720.Google Scholar
TURKEL, Gerald (1979) “Testing Durkheim: Some Theoretical Considerations,” 13 Law & Society Review 721.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto Mangabeira (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara and Patricia, HENNESSEY (1975) “Small Claims, Complex Disputes: A Review of the Small Claims Literature,” 9 Law & Society Review 219.Google Scholar
ZIEGERT, Klaus A. (1977) “Adam Podgórecki's Sociology of Law: The Invisible Factors of the Functioning of Law Made Visible,” 12 Law & Society Review 151.Google Scholar
ZIEGERT, Klaus A. (1978) “Rechtssoziologie in Skandinavien—Der Skandinavische Rechtsrealismus mit Anderen Mitteln (Ein Beitrag zur Vergleichenden Rechtssoziologie mit Bibliographie),” 14 Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie 27.Google Scholar