Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:46:56.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Robert Mason  and
Lyle D. Calvin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A sample survey of 800 Oregon adults showed that nearly one in four admit they practice evasion. Higher percentages were found for people who were young, with low income, male, and who believed their chance of getting caught was low. Occupational prestige and belief that the tax system is unfair were unrelated to noncompliance. Differential opportunities to practice evasion is a promising explanation, and the deterrent effect of penalties seems uncertain. The evidence suggests conceptualizing tax evasion as a white-collar crime by the nature of the violation and not by the characteristics of the offender.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Fall 1978 , pp. 73 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

The authors thank the professional staff of the Oregon Department of Revenue and the Portland District Office of the Internal Revenue Service for providing information used in this paper. Professors Hart Wright and Richard Lempert, University of Michigan Law School, unnamed reviewers and the Review editors made valuable suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper. The survey was supported by a grant from the Oregon Department of Revenue.

References

BALL, Harry V. (1960) “Social Structure and Rent-Control Violations,” 65 American Journal of Sociology 598.Google Scholar
BARLOW, Robin, Harvey E., BRAZER and James N., MORGAN (1966) Economic Behavior of The Affluent. Washington, D. C: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
EDELHERTZ, Herbert (1970) The Nature, Impact and Prosecution of White-Collar Crime. Washington, D. C: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
EDELHERTZ, Herbert, Ezra, STOTLAND, Marilyn, WALSH and Milton, WEINBERG (1977) The Investigation of White-Collar Crime. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
ERICKSON, Maynard L., Jack P., GIBBS and Gary F., JENSEN (1977) “The Deterrence Doctrine and the Perceived Certainty of Legal Punishments,” 42 American Sociological Review 305.Google Scholar
FERBER, Marianne A. and Helen M., LOWRY (1976) “Women: The New Reserve Army of the Unemployed,” 1 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 213.Google Scholar
GROVES, Harold M. (1958) “Empirical Studies of Income-Tax Compliance,” 11 National Tax Journal 291.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN-BUSTAMANTE, Dale (1973) “The Nature of Female Criminality,” 8(2) Issues in Criminology 117.Google Scholar
IREY, Elmer and William, SLOCUM (1948) The Tax Dodgers. New York: Greenberg.Google Scholar
KATZ, Jack (1977) Bias in the Prosecution of White- and Blue-Collar Crime. New Haven: Yale Law School (mimeo).Google Scholar
MASON, Robert, Lyle D., CALVIN and G. David, FAULKENBERRY (1975) Knowledge, Evasion and Public Support for Oregon's Tax System. Corvallis: Survey Research Center, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D. and Sonya, ORLEANS (1967) “On Legal Sanctions,” 34 University of Chicago Law Review 274.Google Scholar
SLOVIC, P., B., FISCHHOFF and S. C., LICHTENSTEIN (1977) “Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking,” in Carroll, J. S. and Payne, J. W. (eds.) Cognition and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
SPICER, M. W., and S. B., LUNDSTEDT (1976) “Understanding Tax Evasion,” 31 Public Finance 295.Google Scholar
STRUMPEL, Burkhard (1969) “The Contribution of Survey Research to Public Finance,” in Peacock, Alan T. (ed.) Quantitative Analysis in Public Finance. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
SUTHERLAND, Edwin H. (1949) White-Collar Crime. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
SUTHERLAND, Edwin H. and Donald R., CRESSEY 8th ed. (1970) Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles R. and Charles H., LOGAN (1973) “Sanctions and Deviance: Evidence and Remaining Questions” 7 Law & Society Review 371.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles R. and Wayne J., VILLEMEZ (1977) “Social Class and Criminality,” 56(2) Social Forces 474.Google Scholar
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1973) Census of Population: 1970 Vol. 1 Characteristics of the Population, Part 39 Oregon. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1976) Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1973) Internal Revenue Service Manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1975a) Annual Report. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1975b) Internal Revenue Code, 1954. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
VAN DUZEN, Roxann and Nicholas, ZILL (1975) Basic Background Items for U.S. Household Surveys. Washington, D. C: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
VOGEL, Joachim (1974) “Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data,” 27 National Tax Journal 499.Google Scholar