Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T01:36:31.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights Advocacy

Review products

Epp Charles R., The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Pp. xv + 326 pages. $17.00 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This essay benefited from my conversations with Mel Durchsiag, Jonathan Entin, Michael Heise, Andrew Morriss, and Robert Strassfeld.

References

References

Aron, Nan (1989) Liberty and Justice for All: Public Interest Law in the 1980s and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick (1976) “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation,” 85 Yale Law J. 470516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellow, Gary & Kettleson, Jeanne (1978) “From Ethics to Politics: Confronting Scarcity and Fairness in Public Interest Practice,” 58 Boston Univ. Law Rev. 337–90.Google Scholar
Berger, Morroe (1978) Equality by Statute: The Revolution in Civil Rights. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. (1990) The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul (1991) “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity,” 96 American J. of Sociology 1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul (1998) Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States Since the New Deal. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul & Monaghan, Kathleen (1986) “Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilization of Law,” 3 Law & Society Rev. 355–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantril, Hadley (1944) Gauging Public Opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Clayborne (1981) In Struggle. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth & Hammond, Phillip E. (1971) The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1976) “The Concept of Laws in Social Science: A Critique and Notes on An Expanded View,” 10 Law & Society Rev. 497523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jo (1975) The Politics of Women's Liberation. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits on Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1983) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Boyum, K. & Mather, L., eds., Empirical Theories of Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nathan (1975) “Toward an Imperial Judiciary,” 45 Public Interest 104–23.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann (1991) Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Godfrey (1996) The World Turned Right Side Up. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Joseph L. (1993) “Is Innocence Sufficient? An Essay on the U.S. Supreme Court's Continuing Problems with Federal Habeas Corpus and the Death Penalty,” 68 Indiana Law J. 817–34.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald (1977) The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Israel, Jerold (1977) “Criminal Procedure, the Burger Court and the Legacy of the Warren Court,” 75 Michigan Law Rev. 13191425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzmann, Robert A. (1986) Institutional Disability: The Saga of Transportation Policy for the Disabled. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (1994) Book Review: “Civil Rights Law: Who Made It and How Much Did It Matter?” 83 Georgetown Law J. 433–59.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard & Sanders, Joseph (1986) An Invitation to Law and Social Science. New York: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Gerald P. (1992) Rebellious Lawyering: One Chicano's Vision of Progressive Law Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan (1986) “Promoting Public-Regarding Legislation Through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model,” 86 Columbia Law Rev. 223–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Leon H. (1968) Law and Equal Opportunity: A Study of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1986) Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1989) “Equal Protection for Social Inequality: Race and Class in Constitutional Ideology,” in McCann, M. W. & Houseman, G. L., eds., Judging the Constitution: Critical Essays on Judicial Lawmaking.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. & Silverstein, Helena (1998), “Rethinking Law's ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S., eds., Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Meili, Stephen (1998) “Cause Lawyers and Social Movements,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S., eds., Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1998) “The Causes of Cause Lawyering: Toward an Understanding of the Motivation and Commitment of Social Justice Lawyers,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S., eds., Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey (1989) “Public Choice and the Dawn of the Special Interest State: The Story of Butter and Margarine,” 77 California Law Rev. 83131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Neal (1986) “The Dilemmas of Legal Mobilization: Ideologies and Strategies of Mental Patient Liberation Groups,” 8 Law & Policy Rev. 105–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, Neal (1989) “The Denigration of Rights and the Persistence of Rights Talk: A Cultural Portrait,” 1989 Am. B. Found. Res. J. 631–75.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha (1987) “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover,” 96 Yale Law J. 18601915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox & Cloward, Richard A. (1979) Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1985) “Legal Effectiveness and Social Studies of Law: On the Unfortunate Persistence of a Research Tradition,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 2331.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. (1993) Book Review: “Public Law Litigation and Social Change,” 102 Yale Law J. 1763–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1996) Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, Ann (1996) “Lawyer-Client Decision Making in Civil Rights and Poverty Practice: An Empirical Study of Lawyers' Norms,” 9 Georgetown J. of Legal Ethics 1101–55.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass N. (1990) After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1987) The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1994) Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Lynn (1985) “The Role of Foundations in Helping To Reach the Civil Rights Goals of the 1980's,” 37 Rutgers Law Rev. 1055–63.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel (1998) The Rights Revolution: Rights and Community in Modern America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. (1995) Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville, VA: Univ. Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Weatherly, Charles Richard & Lipsky, Michael (1977) “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-Education Reform,” 47 Harv. Educ. Rev. 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton, Cartwright, Bliss, Kagan, Robert A. & Friedman, Lawrence M. (1987) “Do the Haves Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1970–1980,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 403–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lucie E. (1987-88) “Mobilization on the Margins of a Lawsuit: Making Space for Clients to Speak,” 16 New York Rev. of Law & Social Change 535–64.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn (1983) “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System,” 77 American Political Science Rev. 690703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 (1954).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241..Google Scholar
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89–10, 79 Stat. 27..Google Scholar