Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T16:14:36.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restorative Justice, Policing and Insurgency: Learning from Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John Braithwaite  and
Ali Gohar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pakistan state law and Taliban rule of Sharia law are at different ends of a politico-legal spectrum. They share advocacy of one system of law and attraction to eradication of alternatives. Muslahathi Committees in Pakistan are used to explore legal pluralism, hybrid institutions that allow deliberative democracy to seek workable responses to injustice. Formal and traditional systems can show mutual respect and check each other. On the basis of purely qualitative evidence, it is argued that Muslahathi Committees are restorative justice programs that sustainably reduce revenge violence, make a contribution to preventing Pakistan from spiraling into civil war, and assist a police force with low legitimacy to become somewhat more accountable to local civil society. These contributions are limited, but could be more significant with modest investment in human rights and gender awareness training to control abuses and increase accountability. The ruthless, murderous, divisive politics of policing and restorative justice in Pakistan seems a least likely case for deliberative democracy to work. In limited ways it does.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 531 - 561
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Our thanks to the Australian Research Council for funding of this research.

References

References

Amin, Abu Bakr (2013) Inside Waziristan. Lahore: Vanguard Books.Google Scholar
Bhatti, Arshed, Bakhsh, Rahim, & Khan, Suleman (2010) Monitoring & Evaluation of Dispute Resolution in NWFP. Islamabad: Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (2002) Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (2006) “Accountability & Responsibility through Restorative Justice,” in Dowdle, M., ed., Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas & Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Gohar, Ali (2013) Restorative Justice, Policing & Insurgency: Learning from Pakistan. RegNet Research Paper No. 2013/14. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2314169 (accessed 2 June 2014).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Wardak, Ali (2013) “Crime & War in Afghanistan: Part I: The Hobbesian Solution,” 53 British J. of Criminology 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandran, D.S. (2013) “FATA & Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2011,” in Chandran, D.S., & Chari, P.R., eds., Armed Conflicts in South Asia 2012. London: Routledge. 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, Nils (1977) “Conflicts as Property,” 17 British J. of Criminology 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Josua, & Sabel, Charles (1997) “Directly Deliberative Polyarchy,” 3 European Law J. 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commaroff, Jean, & Comaroff, John L. (1999) “Occult Economies & the Violence of Abstraction: Notes from the South African Postcolony,” 26 American Ethnologist 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, Mark (1997) “The Decline of Elite Homicide,” 35 Criminology 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, David A. (2008) Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, & Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnen, Sinclair, & Braithwaite, John (2009) “Reinventing Policing Through the Prism of the Colonial Kiap,” 19 Policing & Society 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. (2013) “The Deliberative Democrat's Idea of Justice,” European Journal of Political Theory, published online 14 February 2013. Available at: http://ept.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/14/1474885112466784 (accessed 2 June 2014).Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., & Niemeyer, Simon (2008) “Discursive Representation,” 102 American Political Science Rev. 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Erik O. (1994) “Deliberative Democracy & the Politics of Plural Society,” Presented at the Arena Conference on the Europeanization of Normative Theory, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Fasihuddin, P.S.P. (2010) “The Victim-Offender Mediation (VOM) & Some Recent Initiatives by Police & Local Government Department in Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa, Pakistan,” 2 Pakistan J. of Criminology 125–49.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1984) “Law & Societies,” 22 Osgoode Hall Law J. 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, Miranda (2011) A Bird That Flies with Two Wings: Kastom & State Justice Systems in Vanuatu. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms,” in Cappelletti, M, ed., Access to Justice & the Welfare State. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Gaston, Erica (2013) Lessons Learned on Traditional Dispute Resolution in Afghanistan. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Gohar, Ali (2012) Who Learns from Whom? Pukhtoon Traditions in Modern Perspective. Peshawar: Just Peace International.Google Scholar
Hussain, Khadim (2013) The Militant Discourse. Islamabad: Narratives.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG) (2009) Pakistan: Countering Militancy in FATA. Asia Report No. 178. Brussels: ICG.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG) (2010) The Threat from Jamaat-Ul Mujahideen Bangladesh. Dhaka: ICG.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (ICG) (2013) Pakistan: Countering Militancy in PATA. AsiaReport No. 242. Brussels: ICG.Google Scholar
Just Peace International (2012) Access to Informal Justice System. Islamabad: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David J. (2011) “Deiokes & the Taliban: Local Governance, Bottom-up State Formation & the Rule of Law in Counter-Insurgency,” in Mason, W., ed., The Rule of Law in Afghanistan. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett (1955) Renaissance Diplomacy. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1988) “Legal Pluralism,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 869–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2006) Human Rights & Gender Violence. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (1978) Law as Process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1997) Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2012) On the People's Terms: A Republican Model & Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossner, Meredith (2013) Just Emotions: Rituals of Restorative Justice. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence. W., & Strang, Heather (2011) “Empathy for the Devil,” in Karstedt, S., Loader, I., & Strang, H., eds., Emotions, Crime & Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
South Asian Terrorism Portal (2012) Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), Available at: http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/bangladesh/terroristoutfits/JMB.htm (accessed 27 February 2012).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1995) “Incompletely Theorized Agreements,” 108 Harvard Law Rev. 1733–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardak, Ali (2006) “Structures of Authority & Local Dispute Settlement in Afghanistan,” in Albrecht, H.J., et al, ed., Conflicts and Conflict Resolution in Middle Eastern Societies. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Wardak, Ali, & Braithwaite, John (2013) “Crime & War in Afghanistan: Part II: A Jeffersonian Alternative?” 53 British J. of Criminology 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousufzai, H.M., & Gohar, Ali (2012) Towards An Understanding of Pukhtoon Jirga. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Sindh High Court Karachi, PakistanGoogle Scholar
Mst. Shazia v. Station House Officer and Others, 1523, P Cr. LJ [2004]Google Scholar