Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:03:37.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance, Reconstruction, and Romance in Legal Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Michael W. McCann
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has become obligatory for leaders of professional associations to exhort colleagues to practice their craft in a socially responsible manner. But Joel Handler has issued a more controversial challenge in his 1992 presidential address to the Law and Society Association. He marries the idea of responsible legal scholarship to a recovery of faith in structuralist political analysis and transformative political vision.

Many in the association no doubt will find this proposed marriage undesirable for a variety of intellectual and political reasons" By contrast, I join those many who have found Handler's bold jeremiad provocative and important. Moreover, I share some of his particular concerns about the limitations of much contemporary legal study and political movement activity. At the same time, however, my research on legal mobilization by social movements has led me to draw differently the conceptual lines of both connection and division among the various trends that he identifies. The following comments aim to outline briefly some alternative, although often complementary, readings of these trends and their implications for scholarship. The discussion evolves from my most critical to my most supportive points.

Type
Comments on Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , 1992 , pp. 733 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

I am very grateful for comments on earlier drafts of this essay by Stuart Scheingold, Helena Silverstein, and Christine Di Stefano. Conversations with Nancy Hartsock and others in the political culture group at the University of Washington during the past several years have greatly influenced the development of many ideas advanced in this essay.

References

Brigham, John, & Harrington, Christine (1989) “Realism and Its Consequences: An Inquiry into Contemporary Sociolegal Research,” 17 International J. of the Sociology of Law 41.Google Scholar
Cocks, Joan (1989) The Oppositional Imagination: Feminism, Critique, and Political Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, & Rogers, Joel (1983) On Democracy: Toward a Transformation of American Society. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams (1988) “Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law,” 101 Harvard Law Rev. 1331.Google Scholar
Dubofsky, Melvyn (1975) Industrialism and the American Worker, 1865–1920. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah R. (1988) The Female Body and the Law. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1992) “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness,” 26 New England Law Rev. 731.Google Scholar
Fantasia, Rick (1988) Cultures of Solidarity. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Fink, Leon (1987) “Labor, Liberty and the Law: Trade Unionism and the Problem of the American Constitutional Order,” 74 J. of American History 904.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. (1991) Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, & Nicholson, Linda (1988) “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism,” in Ross 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Joyce, & Palley, Marian Lief (1987) Women and Public Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1987) “Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?” in Harding, S., ed., Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B., & Yngvesson, Barbara (1990) “Interpretive Sociolegal Research,” 15 Law & Social Inquiry 135.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. (1983) Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. (1991) “The Feminist Standpoint Revisited.” Delivered at International Political Science Association meetings, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1985) “The Ideology of Law: Advances in Recent Appolications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 11.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert (1991) “New Social Movements and Resource Mobilization: The European and the American Approach Revisited,” in Rucht, D., ed., Research on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA 17. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher (1968) The Agony of the American Left. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1979) The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1986) Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (in press) Rights at Work: Law and the Politics of Pay Equity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Grant (1966) Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Mascia-Lees, Frances E., Sharpe, Patricia, & Cohen, Colleen Ballerino (1989) “The Postmodernist Turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a Feminist Perspective,” 15 Signs 7.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep (1983) Regulation and the Courts: The Case of Clean Air. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Morone, James A. (1990) The Democratic Wish. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen (1980) Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Rosenau, Pauline (1992) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew, ed. (1988) Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M. (1986) “The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement,” 61 N.Y.U. Law Rev. 554.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1992) “Unleashing Rights: Law and the Politics of the Animal Liberation Movement.” Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Washington.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1985) The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia (1987) “Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructed Rights,” 22 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties L. Rev. 410.Google Scholar