Article contents
Rejoinder
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
Extract
We appreciate Professor Paternoster's evenhanded review of our article and consider many of his concerns legitimate differences of opinion. But it is, nevertheless, useful to specify the key points on which there is agreement or disagreement.
- Type
- Symposium: Research on the Death Penalty
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1993 by The Law and Society Association
- 1
- Cited by