Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:52:03.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redefining the Power of the Federal Judiciary: The Impact of Court-Ordered Prison Reform on State Expenditures for Corrections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

William A. Taggart
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the last two decades, federal judges in virtually all states have ordered state governments to alter dramatically the way they operate such institutions as prisons, hospitals, and mental health facilities. The research presented here seeks to improve our understanding of the budgetary linkage between the federal judiciary and state governments by examining the influence of court-ordered prison reform on state expenditures for corrections. Generally, the results indicate that the judiciary has had a limited but positive impact on capital outlays in one-half of the states examined. The influence on state operating expenditures for corrections has been even less noticeable. The analysis suggests that the judiciary's ability to exercise “the power of the purse” is tempered by the dynamics of state-level budgetary processes and the willingness of courts to adopt a comprehensive view of prison reform.

The judiciary & has no influence over either the sword or the purse.

—Alexander Hamilton

A state is not at liberty to afford its citizens only those constitutional rights which fit comfortably within its budget.

—U.S. District Judge

Frank M. Johnson, Jr.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , 1989 , pp. 241 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.

References

References

ALPERT, Geoffrey P., Ben M., CROUCH, and C. Ronald, HUFF (1984) “Prison Reform by Judicial Decree: The Unintended Consequences of Ruiz v. Estelle,” 9 Justice System Journal 291.Google Scholar
ANTON, Thomas (1966) The Politics of State Expenditure in Illinois. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
AULT, Allen L. (1980) “Resource Utilization in Corrections,” 42 Corrections Today 12.Google Scholar
BAILEY, John J., and O'CONNOR, Robert J. (1975) “Operationalizing Incrementalism: Measuring the Muddles,” 35 Public Administration Review 60.Google Scholar
BERGER, Raoul (1977) Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BENTON, F. Warren, and Judith A., SILBERSTEIN (1983) “State Prison Expansion: An Explanatory Model,” 11 Journal of Criminal Justice 121.Google Scholar
CANON, Bradley C. (1982) “A Framework for the Analysis of Judicial Activism,” in Halpern, and Lamb, (eds.), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
CARROLL, James D. (1982) “The New Juridical Federalism and the Alienation of Public Policy and Administration,” 16 American Review of Public Administration 89.Google Scholar
CHAYES, Abram (1976) “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1281.Google Scholar
COOK, Thomas D., and Donald T., CAMPBELL (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
COX, Archibald (1976) The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIS, Otto A., M.A.H., DEMPSTER, and Aaron, WILDAVSKY (1974) “Towards a Predictive Theory of Government Expenditures: U.S. Domestic Appropriations,” 41 British Journal of Political Science 419.Google Scholar
DAVIS, Otto A. (1966) “A Theory of the Budgetary Process,” 60 American Political Science Review 529.Google Scholar
DYE, Thomas R. (1966) Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
FAIR, Daryl R. (1982) “Remedies Without Rights? The Legal Basis of Broad-Gauge Decrees in Prison Conditions Cases,” 2 Policy Studies Review 262.Google Scholar
FAIRCHILD, Erika S. (1984) “The Scope and Study of Prison Litigation Issues,” 9 Justice System Journal 325.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm, and Samuel, KRISLOV (1985) Constitutional Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
FINN, Peter (1984) “Judicial Responses to Prison Crowding,” 67 Judicature 318.Google Scholar
FRUG, Gerald E. (1978) “The Judicial Power of the Purse,” 126 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 715.Google Scholar
FUNSTON, Richard Y. (1977) Constitutional Counterrevolution? The Warren and Burger Court: Judicial Policy Making in Modern America. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
GIARI, Maygene (1979) “In Oklahoma, Building More Prisons Has Solved No Problems,” 25 Crime and Delinquency 450.Google Scholar
GLAZER, Nathan (1978) “Should Judges Administer Social Services?” 50 The Public Interest 64.Google Scholar
GLAZER, Nathan (1975) “Towards an Imperial Judiciary?” 41 The Public Interest 104.Google Scholar
GRAGLIA, Lino A. (1982) “In Defense of Judicial Restraint,” in Halpern, and Lamb, (eds.), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
GRAGLIA, Lino A. (1976) Disaster by Decree: The Supreme Court's Decisions on the Race and Schools. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
GRAY, Virginia (1976) “Models of Comparative State Politics: A Comparison of Cross-Sectional and Time Series Analyses,” 20 American Journal of Political Science 235.Google Scholar
HALE, George E. (1979) “Federal Courts and the State Budgetary Process,” 11 Administration and Society 357.Google Scholar
HALPERN, Stephen C. (1982) “On the Imperial Judiciary and Comparative Institutional Development and Power in America,” in Halpern, and Lamb, (eds.), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
HARRIMAN, Linda, and Jeffery D., STRAUSSMAN (1983) “Do Judges Determine Budget Decisions? Federal Court Decisions on Prison Reform and State Spending for Corrections,” 43 Public Administration Review 343.Google Scholar
HARRIS, M. Kay, and Dudley P., SPILLER (1976) After Decision: Implementation of Judicial Decrees in Correctional Settings. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
HOPPER, Columbus B. (1985) “The Impact of Litigation on Mississippi's Prison System,” 65 Prison Journal 54.Google Scholar
HOROWITZ, Donald L. (1983) “Decreeing Organizational Change: Judicial Supervision of Public Institutions,” 1983 Duke Law Journal 1265.Google Scholar
HOROWITZ, Donald L. (1977) The Courts and Social Policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1965) Justice in America. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Charles A., and Bradley C., CANON (1984) Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
JOHNSTON, J. (1972) Econometric Methods, 2nd Ed. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
KEMP, Kathleen A. (1984) “Accidents, Scandals, and Political Support for Regulatory Agencies,” 46 Journal of Politics 401.Google Scholar
KEY, V.O. (1940) “The Lack of a Budgetary Theory,” 34 American Political Science Review 1137.Google Scholar
LAY, Donald P. (1979) “The ‘Why’ of Federal Judicial Intervention in State Correctional Institutions,” 41 Corrections Today 36.Google Scholar
LELOUP, Lance T. (1978) “The Myth of Incrementalism: Analytical Choices in Budgetary Theory,” 10 Polity 488.Google Scholar
LOWERY, David, Thomas, KONDA, and James, GARAND (1984) “Spending in the States: A Test of Six Models,” 37 Western Political Quarterly 48.Google Scholar
MARQUETTE, Jesse F., and Katherine A., HINCKLEY (1981) “Competition, Control and Spurious Covariation: A Longitudinal Analysis of State Spending,” 25 American Journal of Political Science 362.Google Scholar
MAYS, G. Larry, and William A., TAGGART (1988) “The Implementation of Court Ordered Prison Reform,” in Nagel, (ed.), Research in Law and Policy Studies, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
MAYS, G. Larry (1985) “The Impact of Litigation on Changing New Mexico Prison Conditions,” 65 Prison Journal 38.Google Scholar
McCLEARY, Richard, and Richard A., HAY (1980) Applied Time Semes Analysis for the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
MULLEN, Joan, and Bradford, SMITH (1980) American Prisons and Jails, Vol. 3, Conditions and Costs of Confinement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
NEELY, Richard (1981) How Courts Govern America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
NESBARY, Dan (1985) Recent Trends in State Corrections Expenditures. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
PALMER, John W. (1977) Constitutional Rights of Prisoners, 2nd Ed. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson.Google Scholar
PARKER, Mary L. (1986) “Prison Litigation in Arkansas: The Process of Change.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Orlando, FL (March 17).Google Scholar
PEIRCE, Neal R. (1987) “Prison: Budget Rathole for the States,” 10 Public Administration Times 2.Google Scholar
PINDYCK, Robert S., and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1981) Econometric Models and Economic Forecastst 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
ROSENBLOOM, David H. (1987) “Public Administrators and the Judiciary: The ‘New Partnership,‘” 47 Public Administration Review 75.Google Scholar
ROSENBLOOM, David H. (1983) Public Administration and Law. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
ROSSITER, Clinton (ed.) (1961) The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
SCHICK, Marvin (1982) “Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court,” in Halpern, and Lamb, (eds.), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
SCHUBERT, Glendon (1965) Judicial Policy-Making. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
SELKE, William L. (1985) “Judicial Management of Prisons? Responses to Prison Litigation,” 65 Prison Journal 26.Google Scholar
SHARKANSKY, Ira (1968) Spending in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
STIMSON, James A. (1985) “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay,” 29 American Journal of Political Science 914.Google Scholar
STRAUSSMAN, Jeffery D. (1986) “Courts and Public Purse Strings: Have Portraits of Budgeting Missed Something?” 46 Public Administration Review 345.Google Scholar
SULLIVAN, Gerald E. (1972) “Incremental Budget-Making in the American States: A Test of the Anton Model,” 34 Journal of Politics 639.Google Scholar
TAGGART, William A. (in press) “A Note on Testing Models of Spending in the American States: The Case of Public Expenditures for Corrections,” Western Political Quarterly.Google Scholar
TAGGART, William A., and G. Larry, MAYS (1985) “Affecting Change in Prison Conditions Through Litigation: The Implementation of Court-Ordered Prison Reform.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego (November 14).Google Scholar
THOMAS, Jim, Anmarie, AYLWARD, Mary Louise, CASEY, David, MOTON, Michelle, OLDHAM, and George, WHEETLEY (1985) “Rethinking Prisoner Litigation: Some Preliminary Distinctions Between Habeas Corpus and Civil Rights,” 65 Prison Journal 83.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Jim, Devin, KEELER, and Kathy, HARRIS (1986) “Issues and Misconceptions in Prisoner Litigation: A Critical View,” 24 Criminology 775.Google Scholar
TUFTE, Edward R. (1974) Data Analysis for Politics and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1986) Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions on December 31, 1983. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1983) Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice: The Data. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS (1947–70) National Prisoner Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS (1976–83) Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1971-83) State Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census [published annually].Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1947–70) Compendium of State Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census [published annually].Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1945–83) State Personal Income. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census [published annually].Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1945–46) Prisoners in State and Federal Prisons and Reformatories. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1945–46) State Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census [published annually].Google Scholar
UNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION (1971–75) Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
USLANER, Eric M. (1976) “The Pitfalls of Per Capita” 20 American Journal of Political Science 125.Google Scholar
WASBY, Stephen L. (1981) “Arrogation of Power or Accountability: ‘Judicial Imperialism’ Revisited,” 65 Judicature 208.Google Scholar
WILDAVSKY, Aaron B. (1975) Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
WONNACOTT, Ronald J., and Thomas H., WONNACOTT (1979) Econometrics, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
YARBROUGH, Tinsley E. (1985) “The Political World of Federal Judges as Managers,” 45 Public Administration Review 660.Google Scholar
YARBROUGH, Tinsley E. (1984) “The Alabama Prison Litigation,” 9 Justice System Journal 276.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Anderson v. Redmon, 429 F. Supp. 1105 (Del. 1977).Google Scholar
Battle v. Anderson, 376 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Okla. 1974).Google Scholar
Chapman v. Rhodes, 434 F. Supp. 1007 (S.D. Ohio 1977).Google Scholar
Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964).Google Scholar
Costello v. Wainright, 397 F. Supp. 20 (M.D. Fla. 1975).Google Scholar
Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1969).Google Scholar
Gates v. Collier, 349 F. Supp. 881 (N.D. Miss. 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt v. Sarver, 300 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. Ark. 1969).Google Scholar
Howard v. Smyth, 365 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James v. Wallace, 406 F. Supp. 318 (M.D. Ala. 1976).Google Scholar
Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan v. Fitzharris, 257 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Ca. 1966).Google Scholar
Laaman v. Helgemoe, 437 F. Supp. 269 (N.H. 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968).Google Scholar
Palmigiano v. Garrahy, 433 F. Supp. 956 (R.I. 1977).Google Scholar
Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266 (1948).Google Scholar
Pugh v. Locke, 406 F. Supp. 318 (M.D. Ala. 1976).Google Scholar
Williams v. Edwards, 547 F.2d 1206 (5th Cir. 1975).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. (1983).Google Scholar