Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:58:16.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “Post-Attitudinal Moment”: Judicial Policymaking Through the Lens of New Institutionalism

Review products

Feeley Malcolm M. and L. Rubin Edward, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xv + 490. $74.95 cloth; $24.95 paper.

Epstein Lee and Knight Jack, The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998. Pp. xviii + 200. $24.95 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

References

References

Baum, Lawrence (1997) The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard (1996-97) “The New Institutionalism, Part I. More and Less than Strategy: Some Advantages to Interpretive Institutionalism in the Analysis of Judicial Politics,” Winter Law & Courts 610.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman (1948) The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers (1988) “Political Jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism,‘ and the Future of Public Law,” 82 American Political Science Rev. 89.Google Scholar
Zaller, John (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Case Cited

Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).Google Scholar