Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:31:00.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Elizabeth Heger Boyle
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

State-society differentiation and political centralization interact to influence the amount, focus, and effect of legal activity. Using case studies of anti-nuclear power litigation in the 1970s in the United States, West Germany, France, and Sweden, this article develops a general theory of political systems and legal activity. While the United States, West Germany, and France all had considerable amounts of antinuclear litigation, in France and Germany such litigation was directed almost exclusively at the state. In the United States, the targets of antinuclear litigation were much more diffuse. Centralized Sweden with its corporatist political system had significantly less antinuclear legal activity than the other three countries, which were roughly comparable. Germany was the only country in which the state took an active role in shaping the content of legal cases, and it was the only country where litigation became a critical factor in modifying national policy. Through these case studies, this article explores how contextual factors such as the political frames of nation-states, which exist apart from individual litigiousness and even apart from legal systems themselves may create particular cross-cultural variations in patterns of legal activity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , 1998 , pp. 141 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1998. All Rights Reserved

Footnotes

Special thanks to Suzanne Thorpe at the University of Minnesota Law School Library for her research and Swedish language skills. I am also indebted to the following colleagues who provided feedback on earlier drafts: Risto Alapuro, Ron Aminzade, David Cooperman, Richard Frase, George Gonos, John Hall, James Jasper, John Meyer, Pamela Oliver, Constance Nathanson, Francisco Ramirez, Joachim Savelsberg, Mark Suchman, John Sutton, and the members of the Stanford sociology department's comparative workshop. An earlier draft of this article was presented at the 1996 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association.

References

References

Aberbach, Joe D., Putnam, Robert D., & Rockman, Bert A. (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, von Harmut (1980) Gerichtsentscheidungen zu Kernkraftwerken. Villingen-Schwenningen: Neckar-Verlag.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. (1987) “Tort Law and the Alternatives: Some Anglo-American Comparisons,” 1987 Duke Law J. 1002–44.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand, & Birnbaum, Pierre (1983) The Sociology of the State. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen, & Parikh, Sunita (1991) “Comparative Perspectives on the State,” 17 Annual Rev. of Sociology 523–49.Google Scholar
Bauer, Etienne, Puiseux, Louis, & Teniere-Buchot, Pierre-Frederic (1976) “Nuclear Energy: A Fateful Choice for France,” Bull, of Atomic Scientists, Jan., pp. 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyme, Klaus von (1983) The Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany. Aldershot, Eng.: Gower.Google Scholar
Blair, Philip (1981) Federalism and Judicial Review in West Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard (1994) “The Infrastructure for Avoiding Civil Litigation: Comparing Cultures of Legal Behavior in The Netherlands and West Germany,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 789–808.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger (1996) “Litigants, Lawbreakers, Legislators: Using Political Frames to Explain Cross-National Variation in Legal Activity.” Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Sociology, Stanford Univ.Google Scholar
Boyle, Miriam, & Robinson, Mike (1987) “Nuclear Energy in France,” in Blowers, A. & Pepper, D., eds., Nuclear Power in Crisis: Politics and Planning for the Nuclear State. New York: Nichols Publishing.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty (1992) Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the IMS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, John (1988) Collapse of an Industry: Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, David, & Johnson, Jeffrey (1981) West Germany: Politics and Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen (1977) Modern Capitalist Planning: The French Model, updated ed. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Conradt, David P. (1991) “From Output Orientation to Regime Support: Changing German Political Culture,” in Hoffmann-Lange, U., ed., Social and Political Structures in West Germany: From Authoritarianism to Postindustrial Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Constance Ewing (1980) Nuclear Power and Legal Advocacy: The Environmentalists and the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., ed. (1966) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Delia Porta, Donatella (1996) “Social Movements and the State: Thoughts on the Policing of Protest,” in McAdams, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N., eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domhoff, G. William (1983) Who Rules America Now? A View for the 1980s. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth (1982) “West Germany: The Search for a Rationalist Consensus,” in Richardson, J., ed., Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Elder, Neil, Thomas, Alastair, & Arter, David (1988) The Consensual Democracies? The Government and Politics of the Scandinavian States. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles (1990) “Connecting Litigation Levels and Legal Mobilization: Explaining Interstate Variation in Employment Civil Rights Litigation,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 145–63.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy (1994) “Legally Mediated Identity: The National Environmental Policy Act and the Bureaucratic Construction of Interests,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 1149–79.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, Rueschmeyer, Dietrich, & Skocpol, Theda (1985) Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, William, Abel, Richard, & Sarat, Austin (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming and Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.Google Scholar
Flam, Helena, ed. (1994) States and Antinuclear Movements. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Flam, Helena, in collaboration with Jamison, Andrew (1994) “The Swedish Confrontation over Nuclear Energy: A Case of a Timid Antinuclear Opposition,” in Flam, , ed., 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, David, Meyer, John, & Miyahara, David (1995) “The Individualist Polity and the Prevalence of Professionalized Psychology: A Cross-National Study,” 60 American Sociological Rev. 360–77.Google Scholar
Frase, Richard (1990) “Comparative Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: How Do the French Do It, How Can We Find Out, and Why Should We Care?” 78 California Law Rev. 539–683.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1989) “Litigation and Society,” 15 Annual Rev. of Sociology 17–29.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael, & Lancaster, Thomas (1989) “Political Transition, Social Development, and Legal Mobilization in Spain,” 83 American Political Science Rev. 817–33.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1968) France in the Age of the Scientific State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleizal, Jean-Jacques (1980) Le Droit Politique de L'Etat. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, Michael S. (1989) “The Non-Reformation of Administrative Law: Standing to Sue and Public Interest Litigation in West German Environmental Law,” 22 Cornell International Law J. 197–244.Google Scholar
Griffin, Stephen (1991) “Bringing State into Constitutional Theory: Public Authority and the Constitution,” 16 Law & Social Inquiry 659–710.Google Scholar
Haley, John Owen (1978) “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant,” 4 J. of Japanese Studies 359–90.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary, & Sutton, John (1989) “The Problem of Control in the Weak State: Domination in the U.S., 1880-1920,” 18 Theory and Society 1–46.Google Scholar
Harrison, Michael (1987) “Government and Politics,” in Shinn, R., ed., Italy: A Country Study. Washington: Headquarters, Department of the Army.Google Scholar
Hatch, Michael (1986) Politics and Nuclear Power: Energy Policy in Western Europe. Lexington: Univ. Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Hayward, Jack (1986) The State and the Market Economy: Industrial Patriotism and Economic Intervention in France. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, & Madsen, Henrik (1987) Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf (1990) “Government Litigation and National Policymaking: From Roosevelt to Reagan,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 477–95.Google Scholar
Ietswaart, Heleen F. P. (1990) “The International Comparison of Court Caseloads: The Experience of the European Working Group,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 571–93.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1997) Modernization and Postmodemization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James M (1990) Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian (1993) Mobilizing against Nuclear Energy: A Comparison of Germany and the United States. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter (1987) Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semi-sovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1984) “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” 16 British J. of Political Science 58–85.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin (1989) Cross-National Research in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald (1976) Judicial Politics in West Germany: A Study of the Federal Constitutional Court. Beverly Hills: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (1995) “The Political Opportunity of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization,” in C.Jenkins, J. & Klandermans, B., eds., The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik, & Magnusson, Tage (1987) “Sweden,” in Page, E. & Goldsmith, M., eds., Central and Local Government Relations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Jethro (1983) The Litigious Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Martin (1994) “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address,” 59 American Sociological Rev. 1–22.Google Scholar
Lucas, Nigel (1985) Western European Energy Policies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Markesinis, Basil (1990) “Litigation Mania in England, Germany, and the USA: Are We So Very Different?” 49 Cambridge Law J. 233–76.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry (1985) The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. (1987) “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account,” in Thomas, G. et al., eds., Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., & Jepperson, Ronald (1996) “The Actor and the Other: Cultural Rationalization and the Ongoing Evolution of Modern Agency.” Unpublished, Stanford Univ.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (1988) “Law, Change, and Litigation: A Critical Examination of an Empirical Research Tradition,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 57–101.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (1990) “Afterword: Studying Litigation and Social Change,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 595–615.Google Scholar
Nathanson, Constance (1996) “Associational Standing in France and the United States with Special Reference to Tobacco Litigation.” Presented at American Sociological Association annual meetings, August.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy, & Pollak, Michael (1977) “The Politics of Participation and the Nuclear Debate in Sweden, The Netherlands, and Austria,” 25 Public Policy 333–57.Google Scholar
Pollak, Michael (1980) “Political Parties and the Nuclear Energy Debate in France and Germany,” 12 (2) Comparative Politics 127–41.Google Scholar
Pollak, Michael (1981) The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Marvin (1982) Participatory Pluralism: Political Participation and Influence in the United States and Sweden. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Olson, Walter K. (1991) The Litigation Explosion: What Happened When America Unleashed the Lawsuit. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Price, Jerome (1990) The Antinuclear Movement. Rev. ed. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Prichard, J. Robert (1988) “A Systemic Approach to Comparative Law: The Effect of Cost, Fee, and Financing Rules on the Development of the Substantive Law,” 17 J. of Legal Studies 451–75.Google Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie (1996) “Courts in the Political Process in France,” in Jacob, H. et al., eds., Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Reed Elsevier INC. (1997) Martindale-Hubbell International Law Digest. Summit, NJ: Martindale-Hubbell.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter (1994) “The Antinuclear Power Movement and the State in France,” in Flam, , ed., 1994.Google Scholar
Ruin, Olaf (1982) “Sweden in the 1970s: Policy-Making Becomes More Difficult,” in Richardson, J., ed., Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sahr, Robert (1985) The Politics of Energy Policy Change in Sweden. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph (1990) “The Interplay of Micro and Macro Processes in the Longitudinal Study of Courts: Beyond the Durkheimian Tradition,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 24:241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Grossman, Joel (1975) “Courts and Conflict Resolution: Problems in the Mobilization of Adjudication,” 69 American Political Science Rev. 1200–1217.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97–166.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim (1994) “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment,” 99 American J. of Sociology 911–43.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillippe (1974) “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Pike, F. & Strich, T., eds., The New Corporatism. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shinn, R. S. (1985) “Government and Politics,” in Wickman, S. B., ed., Belgium: A Country Study. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil, Badie, with B. & Birnbaum, P. (1994) “The Sociology of the State Revisited,” in Smelser, N., ed., Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snow, David, Rochford, E. Burke, & Worden, Steven (1986) “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation,” 51 American Sociological Rev. 464–81.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nahoglu (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stromholm, Stig (1981) An Introduction to Swedish Law. Stockholm: Norstedt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark, & Edelman, Lauren B. (1994) “Legal Rational Myths: Lessons for the New Institutionalism from the Law and Society Tradition.” Presented at Law & Society Association annual meetings, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra N. (1974) Politics, Power, and Bureaucracy in France: The Administrative Elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, William (1977) “The Opposition to Nuclear Power in Europe.” Bull, of Atomic Scientists, Dec, pp. 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1966 [1835]) Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1983) Anti-nuclear Protest: The Opposition to Nuclear Energy in France. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Van Loon, F., & Langerwerf, E. (1990) “Socioeconomic Development and the Evolution of Litigation Rates in Civil Courts in Belgium, 1835–1980,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 283–98.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter (1994) “Contesting Policies and Redefining the State: Energy Policy-making and the Antinuclear Movement in West Germany,” in Flam, , ed., 1994.Google Scholar
Wenner, Lettie (1982) The Environmental Decade in Court. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. (1993) “Government and Politics,” in Solsten, E., ed., Portugal: A Country Study. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
Wittrock, Björn (1980) “Science Policy and the Challenge of the Welfare State,” 3 Western European Politics 358–72.Google Scholar
Zhou, Xueguang (1993) “Unorganized Interests and Collective Action in Communist China,” 58 American Sociological Rev. 54–73.Google Scholar
Zysman, John (1977) Political Strategies for Industrial Order: State, Market, and Industry in France. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar

Cases

Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. AEC, 449 F.2d 1109 (1971).Google Scholar
Northern States Power Company v. Minnesota, 405 U.S. 1035 (1972).Google Scholar
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers, 367 U.S. 396 (1961).Google Scholar