Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:54:03.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Policy Impact of Reapportionment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Roger A. Hanson  and
Robert E. Crew Jr.
Roger A. Hanson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin —Milwaukee
Robert E. Crew Jr.
Affiliation:
Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control State of Minnesota
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A considerable amount of conflict has been generated over the selection of legal standards for legislative apportionment. Prior to 1962, seats in state legislatures were generally assigned to counties. In some houses of some state legislatures, a limited number of additional seats were given to the most populated districts. Population (size) was seldom used, however, either as the sole basis for designing districts or as the sole basis for determining the number of seats for given districts. With the development of the social force of urbanization, a limited number of counties became the residence for a majority of the citizens. Since state legislatures continued to operate with counties as the fundamental unit of legislative apportionment, significant differences in the population of districts were created.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Fall 1973 , pp. 69 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

Authors' Note: We wish to thank Eric Browne, Karen Feste, and Max Nieman for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Cases

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colegrove v. Barrett, 330 U.S. 804 (1947).Google Scholar
Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).Google Scholar
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd v. McCanless, 352 U.S. 920 (1956).Google Scholar
Lucas v. Colorado Gen. Assembly, 377 U.S. 713 (1964).Google Scholar
Radford v. Gary, 352 US. 991 (1957).Google Scholar
Remmy v. Smith, 342 U.S. 916 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).Google Scholar
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

ADRIAN, Charles R. (1960) State and Local Governments. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
BAKER, Gordon (1955) Rural Versus Urban Power. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
BAKER, Gordon (1966) The Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
BANFIELD, Edward C. (1970) The Unheavenly City. The Unheavenly City: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
BICKER, Alexander M. (1962) “The Durability of Colegrove v. Green,” 72 Yale Law Journal 39.Google Scholar
BLACK, Charles L. (1962) “Inequities in Districting for Congress,” 72 Yale Law Journal 13.Google Scholar
BLAIR, George (1967) American Legislatures. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
BLALOCK, Hubert M. Jr. (1972) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
BRADY, David and Douglas, EDMONDS (1967) “One Man, One Vote.. So What,” 4 Trans-action 41.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Donald T. and H. Laurence, ROSS (1968) “The Connecticut Crackdown on Speeding,” 3 Law and Society Review 33.Google Scholar
CLEM, Alan (1963) “Measuring Legislative Malapportionment,” 7 Midwest Journal of Political Science 125.Google Scholar
DIXON, Robert G. (1962) “Legislative Apportionment and the Federal Constitution,” 27 Law and Contemporary Problems 329.Google Scholar
DIXON, Wilfrid J. and Frank J., MASSEY Jr. (1969) Introduction to Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
DYE, Thomas (1965a) “Malapportionment and Public Policy in the States,” 27 Journal of Politics 586.Google Scholar
DYE, Thomas (1965b) State Legislative Politics in Herbert, JACOB and Kenneth, VINES (eds.) Politics in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
DYE, Thomas (1966) Politics, Economics, and The Public. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
EMERSON, Thomas I. (1962) “Malapportionment and Judicial Power,” 72 Yale Law Journal 81.Google Scholar
ERIKSON, Robert S. (1971) “The Partisan Impact of Reapportionment,” 15 Midwest Journal of Political Science 57.Google Scholar
GLASS, Gene V. (1968) “Analysis of Data on the Connecticut Speeding Crackdown as a Time Series Quasi-Experiment,” 3 Law and Society Review 55.Google Scholar
GOLDBERG, Arthur (1962) “The Statistics of Malapportionment,” 72 Yale Law Journal 90.Google Scholar
GRANT, Daniel and H.C., NIXON (1963) State and Local Government. State and Local Government: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
HAWKINS, Brett and Cheryl WELCHEL (1968) “Reapportionment and Urban Representation in Legislative Influence Positions,” 3 Urban Affairs Quarterly 68.Google Scholar
HOFFEBERT, Richard (1966) “The Relation Between Public Policy and Some Structural and Environmental Variables in the American States,” 60 American Political Science Review 73.Google Scholar
ISRAEL, Jerold (1962) “On Charting a Course Through the Mathematical Quagmire,” 61 Michigan Law Review 107.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1964) “The Consequences of Malapportionment,” 43 Social Forces 256.Google Scholar

References

JEWELL, Malcolm (1962) (ed.) The Politics of Reapportionment. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
JEWELL, Malcolm (1966) “The Political Setting,” in Alexander, HEARD (ed.) State Legislatures in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
KEY, V.O. Jr. (1956) American State Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
LANDAU, Martin (1965) “Baker v. Carr and the Ghost of Federalism,” in Glendon, SCHUBERT (ed.) Reapportionment. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
LOCKHARD, Duane (1958) New England Politics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
LUCAS, Jo Desha (1963) “Legislative Apportionment and Representative Government,” 61 Michigan Law Review 711.Google Scholar
McCLOSKEY, Robert G. (1962) “Foreword: The Reapportionment Case,” 76 Harvard Law Review 54.Google Scholar
McKAY, Robert B. (1963) “Political Thicket and Crazy Quilts,” 61 Michigan Law Review 645.Google Scholar
PULSIPHER, Allan G. and James, WEATHERBY Jr. (1968) “Malapportionment, Party Competition, and the Functional Distribution of Governmental Expenditures,” 62 American Political Science Review 1207.Google Scholar
SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E.E. (1962) “Urbanization and Reapportionment,” 72 Yale Law Journal 7.Google Scholar
SCHUBERT, Glendcn and Charles, PRESS (1964) “Measuring Malapportionment,” 57 American Political Science Review 302.Google Scholar
SHARKANSKY, Ira (1968) Spending in the States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
SHARKANSKY, Ira (1970) “Reapportionment and Roll Call Voting,” 51 Social Science Quarterly 129.Google Scholar
SILVA, Ruth C. (1962) “Legislative Representation with Special References to New York,” 27 Law and Contemporary Problems 408.Google Scholar
SINDLER, Allen P. (1962) “Baker v. Carr: How to Sear the Conscience of Legislators,” 72 Yale Law Journal 23.Google Scholar
TYLER, Gus (1962) “Court versus Legislature,” 27 Law and Contemporary Problems 390.Google Scholar
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1967a) City and County Data Bank Book. City and County Data Bank Book: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. U.S: U.S. Government Printing Office..Google Scholar
U.S. U.S: U.S. Government Printing Office..Google Scholar
U.S BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1961-1967b). Statistical Abstract. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
WALKER, Jack L. (1969) “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” 62 American Political Science Review 880.Google Scholar
WEAVER, James B. and Sidney W., HESS (1963) “A Procedure for Nonpartisan Districting,” 73 Yale Law Journal 228.Google Scholar