Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T17:12:56.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of Justice: Race and Gender Differences in Judgments of Appropriate Prison Sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

J. L. Miller ,
Peter H. Rossi  and
Jon E. Simpson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reports on research focused on measuring perceptions of justice vis-a-vis an examination of consensus in perceptions of appropriate punishments for convicted offenders. We used a factorial survey design to measure and analyze both the global judgments formed by individuals as well as the judgment-making principles that characterize the race by gender segments of the general population of one jurisdiction.

A proximity-to-crime perspective leads us to expect structured similarities and differences in judgments of appropriate prison sentences. A global judgment agreement indicator suggests consensus across the race by gender segments of the Boston metropolitan area over which crimes are serious and trivial. The same indicator, however, shows dissensus within the general population regarding perceptions of appropriate levels of punishment.

The research findings suggest that perceived or subjective proximity to crime has stronger implications than objective proximity for judgments of punishments for convicted offenders. The paper concludes that a sense of injustice in regard to punishments prevails for some segments of the general population.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , 1986 , pp. 313 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation, Law and Society Program, Grant SES-8121745. We are thankful to Mary Simpson, Aida Rodriquez, and Eleanor Weber-Burdin for their assistance in data collection and data management. Anonymous reviewers and members of the Sorrento Seminar, especially Harry Potter, made helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

ANDERSON, A. B., A. R., HARRIS, and J., MILLER (1983) “Models of Deterrence Theory,” 12 Social Science Research 236.Google Scholar
BERK, R. A., and P. H., ROSSI (1982) “Prison Reform and State Elites: A Retrospective,” in Rossi, P. H. and Nock, S. L. (eds.), Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1984) Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
GARRETT, K., and P. H., ROSSI (1978) “Judging the Seriousness of Child Abuse,” 2 Medical Anthropology 1.Google Scholar
HAMILTON, V. E., and J., SANDERS (1983) “Universals in Judging Wrongdoings: Japanese and Americans Compared,” 48 American Sociological Review 199.Google Scholar
HANUSHEK, E. A., and J. E., JACKSON (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, M. J. (1978) “Race and Involvement in Common Law Personal Crimes,” 43 American Sociological Review 93.Google Scholar
JASSO, G., and P. H., ROSSI (1977) “Distributive Justice and Earned Income,” 42 American Sociological Review 639.Google Scholar
MANN, C. Richey (1984) Female Crime and Delinquency. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
McCALL, G. J., and J. L., SIMMONS (1978) Identities and Interactions: An Examination of Human Associations in Everyday Life, Rev. Ed. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
MEAD, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MILLER, J. L. (1984) “Normative Consensus in Judgments of Prison Sentences: Popular and Selected Criminal Justice System Perceptions of Fair Punishments for Convicted Offenders.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, P., and C. R., TITTLE (1981) “Gender and Perceived Chances of Arrest,” 59 Social Forces 1182.Google Scholar
ROSSI, P. H., and R. A., BERK (1985) “Varieties of Normative Consensus,” 50 American Sociological Review 333.Google Scholar
ROSSI, P. H., and S. L., NOCK (eds.) (1982) Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
ROSSI, P. H., WAITE, E., BOSE, C. E., and R. A., BERK (1974) “The Seriousness of Crimes: Normative Structure and Individual Differences,” 39 American Sociological Review 224.Google Scholar
ROSSI, P. H., and E., WEBER-BURDIN (1983) “Sexual Harassment on the Campus,” 12 Social Science Research 131.Google Scholar
STEFFENSMEIR, D. J. (1980) “Sex Differences in Patterns of Adult Crime 1965–1977: A Review and Assessment,” 58 Social Forces 1080.Google Scholar
SUDMAN, S. (1984) “Applied Sampling,” in Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., and Anderson, A. B. (eds.), Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1983a) Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1981. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1983b) Jail Inmates, 1982. Bulletin. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1983c) Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions on December 31, 1981. National Prisoner Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
WARR, M., and M., STAFFORD (1983) “Fear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causes,” 61 Social Forces 1033.Google Scholar
WOLFGANG, M.E., and R., FIGLIO (1980) “National Survey of Crime Severity—L.E.A.A. Final Report #7.” Unpublished report submitted to the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.Google Scholar