Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:43:15.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Milton Heumann
Milton Heumann*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The demise of the “upper court myth” (see Frank, 1969: 222-24) and the resultant realization of the importance of the “trial” court has spurred research into the dispositional processes of criminal courts. In the forefront of the results yielded by these efforts is a model of case disposition very different from the familiar Perry Mason courtroom interaction, a model predicated on negotiated dispositions rather than adversary combat, in short, a plea bargaining model.

Plea bargaining can be defined as the process by which the defendant relinquishes his right to go to trial in exchange for a reduction in charge and/or sentence. The pervasiveness of plea bargaining is suggested by the fact that roughly only 10% of all criminal cases go to trial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , Spring 1975 , pp. 515 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

I wish to express my appreciation to Norman Ankers, an honors student in political science at the University of Michigan, and Ronald Burda, a Wayne State University law student, for commentary and for assistance in analyzing the data.

References

Cases

People v. Byrd, 12 Mich. App. 186 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

ALSCHULER, Albert (1968) “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 36 University of Chicago Law Review 50.Google Scholar
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION (tentative draft, 1967) “Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty.” New York Institute of Judical Administration.Google Scholar
BLUMBERG, Abraham S. (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
CASPER, Jonathan (1972) American Criminal Justice: The Defendant's Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT 1901-1925. “Annual Report in Relation to the Criminal Business of the Courts of the State of Connecticut for the Year Ending July 1, 1901 (through 1925) as shown by the Returns of the State and Prosecuting Attorneys,” Public Documents of the State of Connecticut.Google Scholar
COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT 1901-1925. (1890-1900) “Annual Report of the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Connecticut in Relation to the Criminal Business of the Courts for the Year Ending July 1, 1880 (through 1900) as shown by the Returns of the State's Attorneys,” Connecticut Public Documents.Google Scholar
CONNECTICUT PLANNING COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL ADMINISTRATION (1972) “The Criminal Justice System in Connecticut— 1972.” Hartford: Connecticut Planning Committee on Criminal Administration.Google Scholar
DUQUESNE LAW REVIEW (1971) “Plea Bargaining: The Judicial Merry-Go-Round,” 10 Duquesne Law Review 253.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm M. (1973) “Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective,” 7 Law & Society Review 407.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1969) Courts on Trial. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
HARVARD LAW REVIEW (1970) “The Unconstitutionality of Plea Bargaining,” 83 Harvard Law Review 1387.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1974) “Plea Bargaining Systems and Plea Bargaining Styles: Alternate Patterns of Case Resolution in Criminal Courts.” Presented at the 1974 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 2, 1974.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Walter E. (1972) “Plea Bargaining and the Role of the Judge,” 53 Federal Rules Decisions 499.Google Scholar
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CONNECTICUT (1956) Connecticut Judicial Statistics (March). Connecticut Judicial Statistics (March): Judicial Council of Connecticut.Google Scholar
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CONNECTICUT (1926-1970) “First (through Twenty-second) Report of the Judicial Council of Connecticut.” Hartford: Judicial Council of Connecticut.Google Scholar
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CONNECTICUT (1972) “Twenty-third Report of the Judicial Council of Connecticut.” Hartford: Judicial Council of Connecticut.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1973) “Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition: Decision-Making by Public Defenders in Los Angeles,” 8 Law & Society Review 187.Google Scholar
MCINTYRE, Donald M. and David, LIPPMAN (1970) “Prosecutors and Early Disposition of Felony Cases,” 56 American Bar Association Journal 1154.Google Scholar
MILLER, Justin (1927) “The Compromise of Criminal Cases,” 1 Southern California Law Review 1.Google Scholar
MOLEY, Raymond (1928) “The Vanishing Jury,” 2 Southern California Law Review 97.Google Scholar
NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND GOALS (1973) Courts. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
NEWMAN, Donald J. (1956) “Pleading Guilty for Considerations: A Study of Bargain Justice,” in Cole, George F. (ed.), Criminal Justice. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome (1967) “Social Control in the Adversary System,” 11 Journal of Conflict Resolution 51.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Ellen (1974) “Plea Bargaining: The Clash Between Theory and Practice,” 20 Loyola Law Review 303.Google Scholar
WAYNE LAW REVIEW (1971) “Profile of a Guilty Plea: A Proposed Trial Court Procedure for Accepting Guilty Pleas,” 17 Wayne Law Review 1195.Google Scholar
WHITE, Welsh (1971) “A Proposal for Reform of the Plea Bargaining Process,” 119 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 439.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1972) “Restructuring the Plea Bargain,” 82 Yale Law Journal 286.Google Scholar