Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:51:59.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newspaper Coverage of Automotive Product Liability Verdicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Steven Garber  and
Anthony G. Bower
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Media coverage of litigation may affect perceptions and thereby behavior of litigants, judges, juries, legislators and business decisionmakers. Their behavior influences various legal, social, political and economic outcomes. For product liability verdicts during 1983 to 1996 involving automobile manufacturers, we examine the amount of coverage in several dozen newspapers. We find almost no articles reporting on any of 259 verdicts for the defendant. Econometric analysis focuses on determinants of the amount of coverage of 92 verdicts for plaintiffs, 16 of which include punitive damages. Key determinants include the award amount, the nature of injuries, the vehicle's recall history, and especially the existence of a punitive component of damages regardless of its size.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 93 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

Financial support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the RAND Institute for Civil Justice is gratefully acknowledged. Conclusions and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Civil Justice, RAND, or their research sponsors. We thank John Adams, James Dertouzos, seminar participants at RAND, and three thoughtful reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions, and Eva Feldman, Sung-Ho Ahn, Susan McGlamery, Joan Schlimgen and Roberta Shanman for extensive and expert assistance.

References

Abbott, Eric A., & Brassfield, Lynn T. (1989) “Comparing Decisions on Releases by TV and Newspaper Gatekeepers,” 66 Journalism Q. 853–56.Google Scholar
Bailis, Daniel S., & MacCoun, Robert J. (1996) “Estimating Liability Risks with the Media as Your Guide,” 20 Law & Human Behavior 419–29.Google Scholar
Brown, Warren (1986) “Consumers Steer Clear of the Audi 5000S; Sales Plummet on Safety Allegations,” Washington Post, 28 Dec, p. K1.Google Scholar
Daniels, Stephen, & Martin, Joanne (1993) “Don't Kill the Messenger 'till You Read the Message: Products Liability Verdicts in Six California Counties, 1970–1990,” 16 Justice System J. 69–95.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, & Braithwaite, John (1983) The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Edward Jay, & Lee, John (1996) Feature Writing for Newspapers and Magazines: The Pursuit of Excellence. 3d ed. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, Garth, Bryant, Hensler, Deborah, & Zemans, Frances Kahn (1994) “Viewpoint: How to Improve Civil Justice Policy,” 77 Judicature 185, 229–30.Google Scholar
Garber, Steven, (1998) “Product Liability, Punitive Damages, Business Decisions and Economic Outcomes,” 1998 Wisconsin Law Rev. 237–95.Google Scholar
Garber, Steven, & Adams, John (1998) “Product and Stock Market Responses to Automotive Product Liability Verdicts,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1998. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Garber, Steven, & Bower, Anthony G. (1998) “An Econometric Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Automotive Product-Liability Verdicts.” Unpub., Feb., RAND.Google Scholar
Graham, John D. (1991) “Product Liability and Motor Vehicle Safety,” in Huber & Litan, eds. 1991.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. (1997) Econometric Analysis. 3d ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Huber, Peter W. (1991) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Huber, Peter W., & Litan, Robert E., eds. (1991) The Liability Maze: The Impact of Liability Law on Safety and Innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hunziker, Janet R., & Jones, Trevor O., eds. (1994) Product Liability and Innovation: Managing Risk in an Uncertain Environment. National Academy of Engineering. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
LaManna, Sam (1993) “GM Verdict Could Affect Future Cases,” National Law J., 3 May, pp. 21, 25.Google Scholar
Mackay, Murray (1991) “Liability, Safety, and Innovation in the Automotive Industry” in Huber & Litan, eds. 1991.Google Scholar
Mencher, Melvin (1986) Basic News Writing. 2d ed. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.Google Scholar
Metz, William (1991) Newswriting from Lead to “30.” 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Moller, Erik (1996) Trends in Civil Jury Verdicts since 1985. Institute for Civil Justice, MR-694-ICJ. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Pearl, Daniel, & Lavin, Douglas (1994) “U.S. Decision on Recall of GM Trucks Is Delayed as Agency Sees No Precedent,” Wall Street J., 6 June, p. A4.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, & Lichtenstein, Sarah (1982) “Facts versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,” in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A., eds., Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Mary (1990) “Measuring Image Spillovers in Umbrella-Branded Products,” 63 J. of Business 309–29.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rich (1993) “Just as Safe at Any Speed,” Newsweek, 10 May, p. 52.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, & Kahneman, Daniel (1974) “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” 185 Science 1124–31.Google Scholar