Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:19:00.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Politics and Resort to the European Commission on Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Elizabeth Heger Boyle  and
Melissa Thompson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An interesting irony of human rights is that the nation-states that are most susceptible to claims of human rights abuses may not be the most repressive nation-states. Pursuing this modern paradox, the purpose of this research is to determine the factors affecting the number of human rights claims brought by citizens in the international arena. We base our theory on an extension of theories of state strength and test it using a pooled time-series analysis of petitions filed with the European Commission on Human Rights between 1976 and 1993. We find that polity strength, measured through government openness to political minorities and participation in nongovernmental organizations, is positively linked to claims-making. In contrast, a state's tendency to act internationally, represented through participation in international governmental organizations, had a negative effect on the number of claims to the European Commission on Human Rights. Although levels of human rights abuse were positively associated with claims, other factors relating to political organization were equally or more important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 321 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

This research was made possible in part by a Grant-in-Aid of Research from the University of Minnesota. The authors would like to thank John W. Meyer, Christopher Uggen, Evan Schofer, Mayra Gómez, Andrea Hoeschen, and our anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Aberbach, Joel, Putnam, Robert D. & Rockman, Bert A. (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, & Young, Michael P. (1999) “Democratic States and Social Movements: Theoretical Arguments and Hypotheses,” 46 Social Problems 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badie, Bertrand, & Birnbaum, Pierre (1983) The Sociology of the State. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bahar, Saba (1996) “Human Rights are Women's Right: Amnesty International and the Family,” 11 Hypatia 105–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkey, Karen, & Parikh, Sunita (1991) “Comparative Perspectives on the State,” 17 Annual Rev. of Sociology 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1949) Higher Civil Servants in American Society. Boulder: Univ. of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Boli, John (1999) “World Authority Structures and Legitimations,” conclusion to Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875, J. Boli & G. M. Thomas, eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, John, & Thomas, George M. (1999a) Introduction to Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875, J. Boli & G. M. Thomas, eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, John, & George, M. (1999b) “INGOs and the Organization of World Culture,” in Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875, J. Boli & G. M. Thomas; eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, John, & George, M. (2000) “Is Law the Rule? Using Political Frames to Explain Cross-National Variation in Legal Activity,” 79 Social Forces 385–418.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger (1998) “Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, McMorris, Barbara & Gomez, Mayra (2000) “International Norms and Cultural Change: The Case of Female Genital Cutting.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, August 2000.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, & Meyer, John (1998) “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law,” 49 Soziale Welt 275–94.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, & Preves, Sharon (2000) “National Legislating as an International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 401–35.Google Scholar
Cerna, Christina (1994) “Universality of Human Rights and Cultural Diversity: Implementation of Human Rights in Different Socio-Cultural Contexts,” 16 Human Rights Quarterly 740–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacyl, Janina (1996) “Sovereignty Versus Human Rights: From Past Discourses to Contemporary Dilemmas,” 9 J. of Refugee Studies 136–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan (1986) The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant G. (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drzemczewski, Andrew (1983) European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
European Commission and European Court of Human Rights (1976–1993) Yearbook(s) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg, France: European Commission and European Court of Human Rights.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William, Abel, Richard & Sarat, Austin (1980) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming and Claiming...” 15 Law & Society Review 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaete, Rolando (1991) “Postmodernism and Human Rights: Some Insidious Questions,” 2 Law & Critique 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J., O'Boyle, M. & Warbrick, C. (1995) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, Ragin, Charles & Stephens, John (1994) “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State,” 99 American J. of Sociology 711–49.Google Scholar
Hunnings, Neville March (1996) The European Courts. London: Cartermill.Google Scholar
Ietswaart, Heleen (1990) “The International Comparison of Court Caseloads: The Experience of the European Working Group,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 571–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Herbert (1996) Conclusion to Courts, Law & Politics in Comparative Perspective, H. Jacob, E. Blankenburg, H. M. Kritzer, D. M. Provine, & J. Sanders, eds. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald, & Meyer, John W. (1991) “The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations.” The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell, W. & DiMaggio, P., eds. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian (1993) Mobilizing Against Nuclear Energy: A Comparison of Germany and the United States. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert (1997) “Should Europe Worry About Adversarial Legalism?” 17 Oxford J. of Legal Studies 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1987) Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Without Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1986) “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” 16 British J. of Political Science 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (1995) “The Political Opportunity of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization,” in The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, J. C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans, eds. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Dongxiao, & Boyle, Elizabeth Heger (forthcoming) “Making the Case: The Women's Convention and Equal Employment Opportunity in Japan,” International J. of Comparative Sociology.Google Scholar
Magnarella, Paul (1995) “Universal Jurisdiction and Universal Human Rights: A Global Progression,” 12 J. of Third World Studies 159–71.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S. (1993) “Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze,” 8 Sociological Forum 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David S., & Staggenborg, Suzanne (1996) “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity,” 101 American J. of Sociology 1628–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., & Jepperson, Ronald (2000) “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency,” 18 Sociological Theory 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Clovis Jr. (1979) “The European Human Rights Convention System as a Functional Enterprise,” 1 Universal Human Rights 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Dianne (1996) “Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of International Civil Society,” 18 Human Rights Quart. 107–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven, & Tate, C. Neal (1994) “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis,” 88 American Political Science Rev. 853–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollis, Nicholas (1981) “Conformity, Compliance, and Human Rights,” 3 Human Rights Quart. 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1995) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. H. (1982) Human Rights in the World, 2d Ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., Banks, Arthur S. & Textor, Robert B. (1996) World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators and Cross-Polity Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim (1994) “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment,” 99 American J. of Sociology 911–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., & Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Secretary to the European Commission on Human Rights (1976–1988) Stocktaking on the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg, France: European Commission on Human Rights.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin (1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shelley, Louise (1989) “Human Rights as an International Issue,” 506 Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn (1993) “The Power of Principled Ideas: Human Rights Policies in the United States and Western Europe,” in Ideas and Foreign Policy, J. Goldstein & R. Keohane, eds. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil, with Badie, B. & Birnbaum, P. (1994) “The Sociology of the State Revisited,” in Sociology, Smelser, N., ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louise, & Buergenthal, Thomas (1973) International Protection of Human Rights. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra (1974) Politics, Power, and Bureaucracy in France: The Administrative Elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Union of International Associations (1976 to 1993) Yearbook(s) of International Organizations. Brussels: Union of International Associations.Google Scholar
United Nations (1999) General Assembly Resolution No. 53/117 on Traditional or Customary Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Girls, Paragraph 48 (excerpt available at http://www.un.org/Depts/eca/divis/acw/iac/ungares.htm). New York: UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
van Dijk, P. & van Hoof, G.J.F. (1990) Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2d Ed. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Waters, Malcolm (1996) “Human Rights and the Universalisation of Interests: Towards a Social Constructionist Approach,” 30 Sociology: 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Margaret, & Skocpol, Theda (1986) “State Structures and the Possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States,” in Bringing the State Back In, Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
World Values Study Group (1999) WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1990–1993. WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1990–1993: Institute for Social Research (producer) and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).Google Scholar