Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:44:18.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment” and the Development of Legal Consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Mary E. Gallagher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article critically examines the development of legal consciousness among legal aid plaintiffs in Shanghai. It is based on 16 months of research at a large legal aid center and in-depth interviews with 50 plaintiffs. Chinese legal aid plaintiffs come to the legal process with high expectations about the possibility of protecting their rights; however, they also have only a vague and imprecise knowledge of legal procedure and their actual codified rights. Through this process of legal mobilization, plaintiffs' legal consciousness changes in two separate dimensions: changes in one's feelings of efficacy and competency vis-à-vis the law, and changes in one's perception/evaluation of the legal system. Put another way, the first dimension is “How well can I work the law?” and the second is “How well does the law work?” In this study I observe positive changes in feelings of individual efficacy and competency that are combined with more negative evaluations/perceptions of the legal system in terms of its fairness and effectiveness. The positive feelings of efficacy and voice provided by the legal process encourage labor dispute plaintiffs in the post-dispute period to plan new lawsuits and to help friends and relatives with their legal problems. Disenchantment with the promises of the legal system does not lead to despondency, but to more critical, informed action. This study provides new evidence on the nature of China's developing legal system with a focus on the social response to the state-led “rule of law” project.

Type
Law and Lawyers in China
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 783 - 816
Copyright
© 2006 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Albiston, Catherine R. (2005) “Bargaining in the Shadow of Social Institutions: Competing Discourses and Social Change in Workplace Mobilization of Civil Rights,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucock, Cary (2000) In the Grip of Freedom: Law and Modernity in Max Weber. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas (1998) “The Rule of Law Revival,” Foreign Affairs 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Feng (2000) “Subsistence Crises, Managerial Corruption, and Labour Protests in China,” 44 The China J. 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Feng (2004) “Legal Mobilization by Trade Unions: The Case of Shanghai,” 48 The China J. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald (1996) “Power and Politics in the Chinese Court System: The Execution of Civil Judgments,” 10 Columbia J. of Asian Law 1–125.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome A. (2006) “China's Legal Reform at the Crossroads,” 169 Far Eastern Economic Rev 23–8.Google Scholar
Diamant, Neil J. (2000) “Conflict and Conflict Resolution in China: Beyond Mediation-Centered Approaches,” 44 J. of Conflict Resolution 523–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, Neil et al., eds. (2005) Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. (1998) “How Does Law Matter in the Constitution of Legal Consciousness,” in Garth, B. & Sarat, A., eds., How Does Law Matter? Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. (2005) “Globalization and the Decline of Legal Consciousness: Torts, Ghosts, and Karma in Thailand,” 30 Law and Social Inquiry 469–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia (2003) “Common Knowledge and Ideological Critique: The Significance of Knowing that the “Haves” Come Out Ahead,” in Kritzer, H. M. & Silbey, S. S., eds., In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Exner, Mechthild (1995) “The Convergence of Ideology and the Law: The Functions of the Legal Education Campaign in Building a Chinese Legal System,” Issues and Studies 68–102.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., et al. (198081) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Ed. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. (2005) “Use the Law as Your Weapon: The Rule of Law and Labor Conflict in the PRC,” in Diamant, N. et al., eds., Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. (n.d.)“Hope for Protection and Hopeless Choices: Labor Legal Aid in the PRC,” in Goldman, M. & Perry, E. J., eds., Grassroots Political Reform in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Haley, John (1978) “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant,” 359 The J. of Japanese Studies 359–90.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (1999) “Rewriting the Rules of the Game in Russia: The Neglected Issue of the Demand for Law,” 8 East European Constitutional Rev. 89–95.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (2001) “‘Demand for Law’–A Mixed Picture,” 10 East European Constitutional Rev. 73–8.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (2004) “Business Litigation in the Transition: A Portrait of Debt Collection in Russia,” 38 Law & Society Rev. 305–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Virginia Harper (2003) Labor Dispute Resolution in China: Implications for Labor Rights and Legal Reform. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Huang, Philip C. C. (1993) “Between Informal Mediation and Formal Adjudication: The Third Realm of Qing Civil Justice,” 19 Modern China 251–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Philip C. C. (1994) “Codified Law and Magisterial Adjudication in the Qing,” in Bernhardt, K. & Huang, P. C. C., eds., Civil Law in Qing and Republican China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Philip C. C. (2001) Code, Custom, and Legal Practice: The Qing and the Republic Compared. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1993) Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keith, Ronald, & Lin, Zhiqiu (2001) Law and Justice in China's New Marketplace. London and New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1998) Legal Advocacy: Lawyers and Nonlawyers at Work. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., & Silbey, Susan, eds. (2003) In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lam, Willy Wo-Lap (2000) “On the Wave of Political Reform,” South China Morning Post, 21 June, p. 18.Google Scholar
Landry, Pierre, & Tong, Yanqi (2005) “Disputing the Authoritarian State in China.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1–4.Google Scholar
Lazarus-Black, Mindie, & Hirsch, Susan F., eds. (1994) Contested states: law, hegemony, and resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan (2002) “From the Specter of Mao to the Spirit of the Law: Labor Insurgency in China,” 31 Theory and Society 189–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan (2003) “Pathways of Labour Insurgency,” in Perry, E. J. & Selden, M., Chinese Society: Change, Conflict, and Resistance, 2d ed. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Liebman, Benjamin L. (2005) “Watchdog or Demagogue: The Media in the Chinese Legal System,” 105 Columbia Law Rev. 1–157.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida (2006a) “Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court,” 31 Law & Social Inquiry 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida (2006b) “Client Influence and the Contingency of Professionalism: The Work of Elite Corporate Lawyers in China,” 40 Law & Society Review ____CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubman, Stanley (1999) Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China After Mao. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, & Barclay, Scott (2003) “In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 617–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1988) “Law and Culture in the District Court of Honolulu, 1844–1845: A Case Study of the Rise of Legal Consciousness,” 32 The American J. of Legal History 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness of Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan (2002) “How Much Does Law Matter in Beijing?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, May 30–June 1.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan (2006) “The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. (2006) “Xinfang: An Alternative to the Formal Chinese Legal System,” 42 Stanford J. of International Law.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2000) “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2004) License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M., & Conley, John M. (1988) “Lay Expectations of the Civil Justice System,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J. (1996) “Rightful Resistance,” 49 World Politics 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin, & Li, Lianjiang (2004) “Suing the Local State: Administrative Litigation in Rural China,” 51 The China J. 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin, & Li, Lianjiang (2005) Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York and Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Philip (2002a) “In China, Turning the Law Into the People's Protector,” The Washington Post, 28 Dec., p. A01.Google Scholar
Pan, Philip (2002b) “Chinese Workers' Rights Stop at the Courtroom Door,” The Washington Post, 28 June, p. A01.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2001) “Seek Truth from Facts: An Empirical Study of the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the People's Republic of China,” 49 American J. of Comparative Law 249–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2002) China's Long March to Rule of Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, Minxin (1997) “Citizens vs. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in China,” 152 China Q. 832–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, Nakazato, Minoru (1989) “The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan,” 18 J. of Legal Studies 263–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restall, Hugo (2000) “Chinese Farmers Learn Their Rights,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 27 Nov., p. A31.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1990) “‘… The Law Is All Over’: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” 2 Yale J. of Law and the Humanities 343–80.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1986) “Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office,” 20 Law & Society Rev. 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1989) “Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer's Office,” 98 Yale Law J. 1663–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (2004) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Bill W. K., et al. (2004) Industrial Relations in China. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing House.Google Scholar
Tse, Karen I. (2005) “The Legal System's Quiet Revolution,” International Herald Tribune, 11 Feb., http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/02/10/opinion/edtse.php (accessed 22 August 2006).Google Scholar
Upham, Frank (1998) “Weak Legal Consciousness as Invented Tradition,” in Vlastos, S., ed., Mirror of Modernity: Invented Traditions of Modern Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank (2005) “Book Review: Who Will Find the Defendant if He Stays with His Sheep? Justice in Rural China. By Zhu Suli,” 114 Yale Law J. 1675–1719.Google Scholar
Won, Jaeyoun Won (2004) “Withering Away of the Iron Rice Bowl? The Reemployment Project of Post-Socialist China,” 39 Studies in Comparative International Development 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K. (1999) “Law and Discretion in the Modern Chinese Courts,” 8 Pacific Rim Law and Policy J. 581–615.Google Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K. (2003) “Shaping Citizenship: Chinese Family Law and Women,” 15 Yale J. of Law and Feminism 99–134.Google Scholar
Yu, Jianrong (2003) “Contemporary Chinese Peasants' Rights-Protection Activities and Politics.” A Speech at Harvard University, 4 Dec. 2003. Reprinted at http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/4/7/2/n585372.htm (accessed 22 Dec. 2005).Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn (1983) “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of Law in the Political System,” 77 American Political Science Rev. 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statutes Cited

Gonghui Fa [Trade Union Law], promulgated at the Fifth Session of the Seventh National People's Congress on April 3, 1992, amended in accordance with the Decision on Amending the Trade Union Law of the People's Republic of China made at the 24th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People's Congress on October 27, 2001, effective October 27, 2001.Google Scholar
Laodong Fa [Labor Law], promulgated by the Eighth Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Eighth National People's Congress, July 5, 1994, effective January 1, 1995.Google Scholar