Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:39:02.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from the Competition for Transnational Business Disputes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past 20 years, international commercial arbitration has been transformed and institutionalized as the leading contractual method for the resolution of transnational commercial disputes. It has become an important institution of the growing international market. Although the process is far from unidirectional, this work of social construction can be described as a rationalization in the Weberian sense and also as an “Americanization” that has permitted U.S. litigators to shape the rules to favor their adversarial skills and approaches. An informal justice system has come increasingly to resemble “offshore litigation.”

Drawing on Bourdieu's analytical tool of the legal “field” and, in particular, using the notion of an “international legal field,” this case study reveals how the continuing competition for business and for legitimacy—between civil law and common law, “grand old men” and “technocrats,” academics and practitioners—constructs and transforms the system of (international private) justice. As is true generally with respect to law, the details of the competition serve to build the careers of practitioners, to develop the area of practice, and to produce and legitimate the relevant “law.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This research was supported by a substantial grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. SES-9024498) and generous support from the American Bar Foundation. We also received a small but helpful grant from the Phillips Foundation. We have benefited considerably from the research assistance of Carole Silver and also from the research help of Tiffany Davis and Rhonda Mundhenk. Among the very helpful commentators on earlier versions were John Comaroff, Beth Mertz, and Nancy Reichman.

We have cited numerous interviews here. The respondents to our interviews have been numbered, and the citations (e.g., “Int. 85:17”) are to the numbered interview and the page number in that transcript.

References

Abel, Richard, & Lewis, Philip S. C., eds. (1988–89) Lawyers in Society. 3 vols. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press.Google Scholar
Aksen, Gerald (1990) “Arbitration and Other Means of Dispute Settlement,” in Goldsweig, D. & Cummings, R., eds., International Joint Ventures: A Practical Approach to Working with Foreign Investors in the U.S. and Abroad. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Materials, Arbitration (1991) Profile of Arbitrator, Marc Blessing, 3 Arbitration Materials 249.Google Scholar
Berger, Klaus Peter (1993) International Economic Arbitration. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bond, Stephen (1990) “The Present Status of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC: A Comment on an Appraisal,” 1 American Rev. of International Arbitration 108.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, & Wacquant, Loic J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles (1994) “Introduction,” in Lillich & Brower 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Lincoln (1993) Skadden: Power, Money, and the Rise of a Legal Empire. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Carbonneau, Thomas (1989) Alternative Dispute Resolution: Melting the Lances and Dismounting the Steeds. Champaign: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Carbonneau, Thomas, ed. (1990) Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publications.Google Scholar
Casella, Alessandra (1992) Arbitration in International Trade. Working Paper No. 4136. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charny, David (1991) “Competition among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the European Communities,” 32 Harvard International Law J. 423.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Charles (1992) “The Rainbow Warrier Arbitration between New Zealand and France,” 9 J. of International Arbitration 17.Google Scholar
Clow, Robert, & Stewart, Patrick (1990) “International Arbitration: Storming the Citadels,” 9 International Financial Law Rev. 10.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane (1994) “Intertwined Histories: Islamic Law and Western Imperialism,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 395.Google Scholar
Craig, W. Laurence, Park, William W., & Paulsson, Jan (1990) International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration. 2d ed. New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
de Ly, Filip (1992) International Business Law and Lex Mercatoria. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves (1992) Marchands de droit. Paris: Fayard. (Forthcoming English translation, Northwestern Univ. Press.).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant (forthcoming) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Internationalization of Legal Practice (forthcoming).Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul (1991) “Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920–40,” in Powell & DiMaggio 1991.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1985) “‘…A Settlement Judge, Not a Trial Judge’: Judicial Mediation in the United States,” 12 J. of Law & Society 1.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant (1980) Neighborhood Law Firms for the Poor. Rockville, MD: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert (1984) “The Ideal and the Actual in the Law': Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910,” in Gawalt, G., ed., The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post–Civil War America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark, & Swedberg, Richard, eds. (1992) The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. (1992) “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” 46 International Organization 1 (Winter).Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1993) Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert (1994) “Do Lawyers Cause Adversarial Legalism? A Preliminary Inquiry,” 19 Law & Social Inquiry 1.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1994) “Transnational Issue Networks in International Politics” (unpublished, Yale Univ. & Univ. of Minnesota).Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony (1993) The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideas of the Legal Profession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lalive, Pierre (1991) “L'independence des arbitres dans le systeme CCI,” 9 (1) Bull, of the Swiss Arbitration Association 46.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard (1994) “The Law Governing Disputes under Economic Development Agreements: Reexamining the Concept of ‘Internationalization,‘” in Lillich & Brower 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillich, Richard, & Brower, Charles, eds. (1994) International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards ‘Judicialization’ and Uniformity? Irvington, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas (1985) “The Two-Way Mirror: International Arbitration as Comparative Procedure,” 1985 Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies 163.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas (1991) “An Arbitrator's Declaration of Independence,” 2 Bull, of the Swiss Arbitration Association 85.Google Scholar
Margolick, David (1993) Undue Influence: The Epic Battle for the Johnson & Johnson Fortune. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig, Mather, Lynn, & Maiman, Richard (1994) “Lawyers, Mediation, and the Management of Divorce Practice,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 149.Google Scholar
Mentschikoff, Soia, & Haggard, Ernest A. (1977a) “Decision Making and Decision Consensus in Commercial Arbitration,” in Tapp, J. L. & Levine, F. J., eds., Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Levine, F. J. (1977b) “Responsible Decision Making in Dispute Settlement,” in Tapp, J. L. & Levine, F. J., eds., Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, North, Douglass, & Weingast, Barry (1990) “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges and the Champagne Fairs,” 2 Economics & Politics 1.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert, & Kornhauser, Lewis (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law J. 950.Google Scholar
Moser, Michael (1993) “Hong Kong Court Refuses to Enforce Chinese Arbitration Award,” 4 World Arbitration & Mediation Report 40.Google Scholar
Mustill, Michael (1987) “The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-five Years,” in Bos, M. & Brownlie, I., eds., Liber Amicorum for the Rt. Hon. Lord Wilberforce. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. (1988) Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olgiati, Vittorio (1995) in Dezalay, Yves & Sugarman, David, eds., Professional Competition and the Social Construction of Markets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark (1989) “Lawyers as Monopolists, Aristocrats, and Entrepreneurs,” 103 Harvard Law Rev. 2009.Google Scholar
Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law, Columbia University (1992) Guide to International Arbitration and Arbitrators. 2d ed. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publications.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan (1985) “Introduction,” 1 International Arbitration 2.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan (1990) “La Lex Mercatoria dans l'Arbitrage CCI,” 1 Bull, du Comite Français de l'Arbitrage 55.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter, & DiMaggio, Paul, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Edward A. Jr. (1992) Litigation and Inequality: Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870–1958. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, Alan, & Hunter, Martin (1991) Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. 2d ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, G. (1938) Merchants of Peace. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald (1991) Making Global Deals: Negotiating in the International Marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel (1993) “International Regulatory Competition, Externalization, and Jurisdiction,” 34 Harvard International Law J. 47.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom, & Mitchell, Gregory (1994) “Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights,” 43 Duke Law J. 703.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank (1994) “Speculations on Legal Informality: On Winn's ‘Relational Practices and the Marginalization of Law,‘” 28 Law & Society Rev. 233.Google Scholar
Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max (1978) Economy and Society, ed. Roth, G. & Wittich, C.. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Jacques (1985) “Competition within the Arbitration Industry,” 2 J. of International Arbitration 5.Google Scholar
Wetter, J. Gillis (1990) “The Present Status of the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC: An Appraisal,” 1 American Rev. of International Arbitration 91.Google Scholar
Winn, Jane Kaufman (1994) “Relational Practices and the Marginalization of Law: Informal Financial Practices of Small Businesses in Taiwan,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 193.Google Scholar
World Arbitration & Mediation Report (1993) “ICC Panel Hands Down Second Award in £1.2 Billion Channel Tunnel Dispute,” 4 World Arbitration & Mediation Report 86–87.Google Scholar
World Arbitration & Mediation Report (1994) “ICC Court Reports Increase in Filings, More Diversity among Parties,” 5 World Arbitration & Mediation Report 216.Google Scholar