Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:11:43.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Marihuana Muddle” as Reflected in California Arrest Statistics and Dispositions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Stanley E. Grupp  and
Warren C. Lucas
Stanley E. Grupp
Affiliation:
Illinois State University
Warren C. Lucas
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The “marihuana problem” has rapidly degenerated into the “marihuana muddle.” As the use of marihuana increases, and as this use expands into the middle and upper classes, officials are increasingly confronted with questions concerning the effects and dangers of marihuana. Unfortunately, the answers that can be given are limited. We really do not know very much about marihuana. Perhaps the most decisive point that can be made is that the possession and sale of marihuana are against the law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , November 1970 , pp. 251 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

AUTHOR'S NOTE: The authors wish to express appreciation to their colleague Ray Schmitt, to Chuck Bridges, Hugh Penn, Elmer Hauge, and Ira Greenstein of the California Bureau of Criminal Statistics and to the graduate students at Illinois State University who read an early draft of this paper and offered helpful suggestions. This is a revision of a paper read at the 1969 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, September 4 in San Francisco.

References

ARNOLD, M. (1965) “Narcotics: a growing problem of affluent youth.” New York Times (January 4): 1.Google Scholar
Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice (1967) Drug Arrests and Dispositions in California, 1966. Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice (1966) Drug Arrests and Dispositions in California, 1965. Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice (1965) Crime in California, 1964. Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice (1962) Narcotic Arrests and Their Dispositions in California (1961). Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice (1961) Narcotic Arrests and Their Dispositions in California (1960). Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Narcotics (1965) Traffic in Opium and Other Dangerous Drugs. Washington, D.C.: United States Treasury Department.Google Scholar
CHAYET, N. L. (1968) “Legal aspects of drug abuse.” Suffolk Univ. Law Rev. 3 (Fall): 1–22.Google Scholar
Chicago Police Department (1968) Chicago Police Annual Report, 1967. Chicago: City of Chicago.Google Scholar
Chicago Police Department (1967) Chicago Police Statistical Report, 1966. Chicago: City of Chicago.Google Scholar
Council on Mental Health and the Committee on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence of the American Medical Association and the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence of the National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (1968) “Marijuana and society.” J. of the Amer. Medical Assn. 204 (June 24): 91–92.Google Scholar
Department of Corrections, Research Division, Administrative Statistics Section (1961-1966) California Prisoners. Sacramento: State of California.Google Scholar
ETZIONI, A. (1968) “Toward perspective on marijuana.” Wall Street J. (March 25): 14.Google Scholar
GEIS, G. (1968) “Social and epidemiological aspects of marijuana use.” Presented at the National Symposium on Psychedelic Drugs and Marijuana, Illinois State Medical Society, Chicago, Illinois (April 11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIORDANO, H. L. (1968) “The prevention of drug abuse.” Humanist 28 (March-April): 20–23.Google Scholar
LINDESMITH, A. R. (1965) The Addict and the Law. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McBROOM, P. (1966) “‘Pot’ penalties too severe.” Science News 90 (October): 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLER, D. E. (1966) “Narcotic drug and marijuana controls.” Presented at the National Assn. of Student Personnel Administrators, Drug Education Conference. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
MORTON, A. S., MUELLER, J., OHLGREN, J., PEARSON, R. W., and S., WEISEL (1968) “Marijuana laws: an empirical study of enforcement and administration in Los Angeles County.” UCLA Law Rev. 15 (September): 1499–1585.Google Scholar
MUNCH, J. C. (1966) “Marijuana and crime.” Bull, on Narcotics 18 (April-June): 15–22.Google Scholar
Newsweek (1965) “Pot-picking time.” 65 (May 17): 42.Google Scholar
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967) Task Force Report: Narcotics and Drug Abuse. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
SANFORD, D. (1967a) “Pot bust at Cornell.” New Republic 156 (April 15): 17.Google Scholar
SANFORD, D. (1967b) “The risks of marijuana.” New Republic 156 (April 22): 1.Google Scholar
SCHUR, E. (1965) Crimes Without Victims. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
SEEVERS, M. H. (1966) “Marijuana in perspective.” Michigan Q. Rev. 5 (October): 247–251.Google Scholar
SIMMONS, J. L. [ed.] (1967) Marijuana Myths and Realities. North Hollywood, CC.: Brandon House.Google Scholar
SIMON, W. and J. H., GAGNON (1968) “Children of the drug age.” Saturday Rev. 51 (September 21): 61–63; 75–78.Google Scholar
SUCHMAN, E. A. (1968) “The ‘hang-loose’ ethic and the spirit of drug use.” J. of Health and Social Behavior 9 (June): 146–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Time (1967) “Drugs on campus.” 89 (March 24): 36.Google Scholar
Time (1965) “The pot problem.” 85 (March 12): 49.Google Scholar