Article contents
Limitations of the Case-Method in the Study of Tribal Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Extract
E. Adamson Hoebel is justly honoured for the contribution he made to the study of tribal law by insisting on the recording and study of what he, with the late Karl N. Llewellyn, called “trouble-cases” in their innovative book, The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (1941). The fruitfulness of this method was demonstrated also by Hoebel in another book, published at virtually the same time, on The Political Organization and Law-Ways of the Comanche Indians (1940), and argued further in his The Law of Primitive Man (1954). We may see the form of these studies as emerging partially from the method of case-law in Anglo-American jurisprudence, and here the influence of Llewellyn was probably important. But concentration on specific “cases”, “situations”, “incidents”, et alia, was also part of a general tendency in social science from the 1920's onwards: the increasing focus of analysis on untangling the structure of specific situations against the general social background was marked in political science and economics (see e.g., Devons, 1960, 1970) and sociology (see e.g., Gouldner, 1954). I have discussed the general development in social anthropology (Gluckman, 1959, 1965b, 1967).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1973.
Footnotes
AUTHOR'S NOTE: I am grateful to the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, for a Fellowship during the tenure of which this essay was written, and to the University of Manchester for leave to take up that Fellowship, and to the Nuffield Foundation for a Special Fellowship enabling me to concentrate on research. I also thank Professor R. Abel who sent me a most helpful letter of comment which enabled me to clarify certain points.
References
- 16
- Cited by