Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:27:21.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Reconstitution of the Welfare State: A Latent Social Democratic Legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

David Kettler
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A critical review of two recent discussions of problems in the law of the welfare state helps to explain the contemporary appeals of a theory of legal evolution originally developed by social democratic theorists in conjunction with the rise of collective labor law in settings as disparate as Germany and the United States. Influential contemporary formulations treat collective labor law as merely one example of a generalizable decentralization of regulative and constitutive law, taken as a distinguishing feature of a new evolutionary stage. But the question is raised whether the plausibility of this model does not tacitly depend on a positive reading of the labor experience, and consequently whether its present relevance is not seriously put into question by the deep crisis of the labor movement, whose social and political power was acknowledged by the original theorists to underlie the legal structures taken as paradigmatic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , 1987 , pp. 9 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

This article is based on a seminar that was first presented in Coesfeld, F.R.G., December 8–10, 1983, at the conference “Reform in Democracies,” organized by Rüdiger Voigt and sponsored by the Ministry for Science and Research of North Rhine-Westphalia, and then offered at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS), February 23, 1984 in Wassenaar, the Netherlands. I am grateful to Jennifer Nedelsky, Theodore Lowi, and Volker Meja for suggestions concerning revisions. My ongoing research is indebted to support from NIAS; the Bard College Center, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York; Trent University Research Committee, Peterborough, Ontario; and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

References

AARON, B. (1982) “Labor Relations Law in the United States from a Comparative Perspective,” 39 Washington and Lee Law Review 1247.Google Scholar
ADAMS, Graham Jr. (1966) Age of Industrial Violence, 1910–1915: The Activities and Findings of the U.S. Commission on Industrial Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
BERGER, S. (1981) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BERNIER, Ivan, and Andrée, LAJOIE (1986) “Law, Society and the Economy: An Overview,” in Law, Society and the Economy, Vol. 46 of the Research Studies Prepared for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard (1984) “The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner's Case for Reflexive Law,” 18 Law & Society Review 273.Google Scholar
BLOCK, Richard N., and Kenneth, MCLENNAN (1985) “Structural Economic Change and Industrial Relations in the United States' Manufacturing and Transportation Sectors since 1973,” in Juris, Hervey et al. (eds.), Industrial Relations in a Decade of Economic Change. Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
BUREAU, Robert D., Katherine, LIPPEL, and Lucien, LAMARCHE (1986) “The Evolution and Trends of Social Welfare Legislation in Canada, 1940 to 1988,” in Family Law and Social Welfare Legislation in Canada, Vol. 50 of the Research Studies Prepared for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
COE, Richard D., and Charles K., WILBER (1985) Capitalism and Democracy: Schumpeter Revisited. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW (1978) “Special Project: The Remedial Process in Institutional Reform Litigation,” 78 Columbia Law Review 784.Google Scholar
CONFERENCE ON REGULATORY LAW AND REGULATORY CRISIS (1983) “Compilation of Papers,” ed. D. Trubek. Presented at the Disputes Processing Research Program, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison (July 18–21).Google Scholar
CONNOLLY, William E. (1969) The Bias of Pluralism. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
COX, A. (1963) Law and the National Labor Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press (Institute of Industrial Relations).Google Scholar
COX, A. (1976) The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIES, P., M., FREEDLAND, and O., KAHN-FREUND (1983) Labour and the Law, 3rd Ed. London: Stevens and Son.Google Scholar
DEWEY, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
DONNER, A.M. (1981) “Grondwetsherziening en staatsrechtsdogmatiek, lets over het materieel wetsbegrip.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
DONNER, A.M. (1979) Bestending en wederkering: Over het verband van staat en staatsrecht. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
DUNN, John (1984) The Politics of Socialism: An Essay in Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENGELS, F., and K., KAUTSKY (1887) “Juristen-Sozialismus,” 2 Die Neue Zeit.Google Scholar
ERD, R. (1977) “Verrechtlichte Gewerkschaftspolitik: Bedingungen ihrer Entwicklung und Veränderung,” in Bergmann, J. (ed.), Beiträge zur Soziologie der Gewerkschaften. Frankfort: Edition Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
FEIGE, E. (1980) “A New Perspective on Macroeconomic Phenomena. The Theory and Measurement of the Unobserved Sector of the United States Economy: Causes, Consequences and Implications.” Presented to the Annual American Economics Association, Denver (August).Google Scholar
FRAENKEL, E. (1973) Reformismus und Pluralismus. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
FRANKFURTER, Felix (1961) Mr. Justice Holmes and the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1985) Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
FUNSTON, R. Y. (1977) Constitutional Counter-Revolution? Cambridge, MA: Schenkmann Publishing.Google Scholar
GALANTER, M. (1976) “Legalization and Delegalization.” Unpublished. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York (August).Google Scholar
GLENDON, Mary Ann (1981) The New Family and the New Property. Toronto: Butterworth's.Google Scholar
GÖRLITZ, Axel, and VOIGT, Rüdiger (1985) Rechtspolitologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GROSHEIDE, F. W. (1982) Eigendom in de overgang? Amsterdam: Calvinistische Juristen Vereniging.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, Jürgen (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 2. Frankfort: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, Jürgen (1969) Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
HARTWICH, H. H. (1967) Arbeitsmarkt, Verbaende und Staat, 1918–33: Die oeffentliche Bindung unternehmerischer Funktionen in der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAY, J. R. (1975) The Origins of the Liberal Welfare Reforms, 1906–1914. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
HAYEK, F. A. (1973–79) Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
HAYEK, F. A. (1944) The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
HEDEMANN, Justus Wilhelm (1933) Die Flucht in die Generaklauseln: Eine Gefahr für Recht und Staat. Tübingen: Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
HIRSCH, H. N. (1981) The Enigma of Felix Frankfurter. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
HUXLEY, Christopher, David, KETTLER, and James, STRUTHERS (1986) “Is Canada's Experience 'Especially Instructive'?” in Lipset, 1986.Google Scholar
IRONS, Peter (1982) The New Deal Lawyers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JONES, G. S. (1983) Languages of Class: Studies in Working Class History, 1832–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
JÖRGES, Christian (1983) “Regulatory Law: Private Government and Self-Government,” in Conference on Regulatory Law and the Regulatory Crisis, 1983.Google Scholar
JONES, Harry W. (1958) “The Rule of Law and the Welfare State,” 52 Columbia Law Review 143.Google Scholar
KAHN-FREUND, Otto ([1979] 1981) “Postscript,” in Lewis, R. and Clark, J. (eds.), Labour Law and Politics in the Weimar Republic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
KAHN-FREUND, Otto ([1976] 1981) “Hugo Sinzheimer, 1875–1945,” in Lewis, R. and Clark, J. (eds.), Labour Law and Politics in the Weimar Republic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
KAHN-FREUND, Otto ([1932] 1981) “The Social Ideal of the Reich Labour Court,” in Lewis, R. and Clark, J. (eds.), Labour Law and Politics in the Weimar Republic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
KAISER, Andreas (1981) “Arbeitsrechtswissenschaft und Gewerkschaften gegen Ende der Weimarer Zeit,” in Reifner, U. (ed.), Das Recht des Unrechtstaates. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
KAISER, Andreas (1980) “Kollektives Arbeitsrecht und gewerkschaftliche Funktionsverlust in der Weimarer Republik,” 8 Demokratie und Recht 444.Google Scholar
KASKEL, W. (1932) Arbeitsrecht, 4th Ed., ed. Herman Dersch. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KASKEL, W. (1922) “Buecher-Kommentar,” 1 Recht und Wirtschaft 70.Google Scholar
KETTLER, David (1986) “Figure and Ground in Reflexive Law: Collective Labor Regimes in Canada and the United States.” Presented at the International Symposium on the Limitations of Law, Bielefeld, West Germany (February 28–March 1).Google Scholar
KETTLER, David (1984) “Works Community and Workers' Organization: A Central Problem in Weimar Labour Law,” 13 Economy and Society 278.Google Scholar
KETTLER, David (1969) “The Politics of Social Change: The Relevance of Democratic Approaches,” in Connolly, 1969.Google Scholar
KETTLER, David (1967) “Political Science and Political Rationality,” in Spitz, D. (ed.), Political Theory and Social Change. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
KETTLER, David, V., MEJA, and N., STEHR (1984) Karl Mannheim. London: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
KIRCHHEIMER, Otto (1964) Politik und Verfassung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
KLARE, K. (1982) “Critical Theory and Labor Relations Law,” in Kairys, D. (ed.), The Politics of Law. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
KLARE, K. (1978) “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937–41,” 62 Minnesota Law Review 265.Google Scholar
KOCHAN, Thomas (ed.) (1985) Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
KORSCH, K. ([1922] 1980) “Der tote Sinzheimer und der lebende Marx,” in Gesamtausgabe: Raetebewegung und Klassenkampf Vol. 2. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
LASALLE, F. ([1862] 1919) Die Verfassungsreden: Gesammelte Reden und Schriften, Vol. 2, ed. Bernstein, Eduard. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
LEHMBRUCH, G., and P. C., SCHMITTER (eds.) (1981) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
LINDBLOM, C. (1977) Politics and Markets=The World's Political: Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
LINDBLOM, C. (1965) The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
LIPSET, S. M. (ed.) (1986) Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
LIPSET, S. M. (ed.) (1983) “Radicalism or Reformism: The Sources of Working-Class Politics,” 77 The American Political Science Review 1.Google Scholar
LOEWE, Adolph (1935) Economics and Sociology. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
LOWI, T. J. (1985) “The Welfare State, the New Regulation, and the Rule of Law.” (Pre-Publication) Discussion Papers of the Center for Studies of Changing Norms and Mobility, No. 54/85 ed. R. Voigt, Siegen University, West Germany.Google Scholar
LOWI, T. J. (1979) The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd Ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1985) “Einige Probleme mit reflexivem Recht,” 1985 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 1.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1981) Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Munich: Günter Olzog Verlag.Google Scholar
LUKES, S. and A., SCULL (1983) Durkheim and the Law. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
MAIER, C. (1975) Recasting Bourgeois Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MANNHEIM, K. (1940) Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. London: Kegan and Paul.Google Scholar
MARSHALL, T.H. ([1949] 1965) “Citizenship and Social Class,” in Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
MARTIN, Andrew (1986) “The Politics of Employment and Welfare: National Policies and International Interdependence,” in The State and Economic Interests, Vol. 32 of the Research Studies Prepared for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
MARTINY, M. (1976) Integration oder Konfrontation? Bonn: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
MASON, Alpheus T. (1956) Brandeis: A Free Man's Life. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
MENGER, A. ([1903] 1927) Das bürgerliche Recht und die besitzlosen Klassen. Tubingen: Verlag der H. Laupp'schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
MISHRA, Ramesh (1984) The Welfare State in Crisis. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
MITNICK, Barry M. (1980) The Political Economy of Regulation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MÜNCH, Richard (1985) “Die sprachlose Systemtheorie: Systemdifferenzierung, reflexives Recht, reflexive Selbststeuerung und Integration durch Indifferenz,” 1985 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 19.Google Scholar
NEDELSKY, J. (1983) “Individual Autonomy in the Bureaucratic State: Toward a Reconception.” Unpublished. American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
NEDELSKY, J. (1982) “American Constitutionalism and the Paradox of Private Property.” Unpublished. Law & Society Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
DIE NEUE ZEIT (1890–1) “Die soziale Frage und die Rechtsordnung,” 1/2 Die Neue Zeit 430, 476.Google Scholar
NEUMANN, F. L. ([1930] 1981) “The Social Significance of the Basic Laws in the Weimar Constitution,” 10 Economy and Society 329.Google Scholar
NEUMANN, F. L. ([1936] 1980) Die Herrschaft des Gesetzes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
NEUMANN, F. L. ([1937] 1957) “The Change in the Function of Law in Modern Society,” in The Democratic and the Authoritarian State. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
NEUMANN, F. L. (1944) Behemoth, 2nd Rev. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
NIPPERDEY, Hans Carl (ed.) (1930) Die Grundrechte und die Grundpflichten der Reichsverfassung. Berlin: Verlag von Reinar Hobbing.Google Scholar
NONET, P., and P., SELZNICK (1978) Law and Society in Transition. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
OFFE, CLAUS (1985) Disorganized Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
OFFE, CLAUS (1981) “The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations on the West German Case,” in Berger, 1981.Google Scholar
OFFE, CLAUS (1972) “Advanced Capitalism and the Welfare State,” 2 Politics and Society 479.Google Scholar
ORLOFF, Ann Shola, and Theda, SKOCPOL (1984) “Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880's–1920,” 49 American Sociological Review 726.Google Scholar
PANITCH, Leo, and Donald, SWARTZ (1985) From Consent to Coercion: The Assault on Trade Union Freedoms. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
PRELLER, Ludwig (1949) Sozialpolitik in der Weimarer Republik. Stuttgart: Franz Mittelbach Verlag.Google Scholar
PREUSS, Ulrich K. (1983) “The Concept of Rights in the Welfare State,” in Conference on Regulatory Law and the Regulatory Crisis, 1983.Google Scholar
PREUSS, Ulrich K. (1973) Legalität und Pluralismus: Beiträge zum Verfassungsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
PRYOR, F. L. (1968) Public Expenditures in Communist and Capitalist Nations. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
RADBRUCH, G. (1930) “Arbeitskraft,” in Nipperdey, H.-C. (ed.) Die Grundrechte und die Grundpflichten in der Reichsverfassung, Vol. 3. Berlin: Verlag von Rainer Hobbing.Google Scholar
RAISER, L. (1977) “Die Zukunft des Privatrechts,” in Die Aufgabe des Privatrechts: Aufsaetze zum Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht aus drei Jahrzenten. Kronberg/Ts.Google Scholar
RAMM, T. (1966) Arbeitsrecht und Politik. Neuwied: Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar
REICH, C. (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law Journal 733.Google Scholar
REICH, Norbert (1983) The Regulatory Crisis: Does It Exist and Can It Be Solved? Bremen: Zentrum für Europäsche Rechtspolitik.Google Scholar
REIDEGELD, Eckart (1980) “Vollzugsdefizite sozialer Leistungen: Verrechtlichung und Bürokratisation als Grenzen der Sozialpolitik,” in Voigt, 1980.Google Scholar
RENNER, K. ([1905] 1949) The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions, ed. and trans. O. Kahn-Freund. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
RENNER, K. (1929) Wege der Verwirklichung. Berlin: Verlag von J.H.W. Dietz Nfg.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, B. C. (1984) “Recent Trends in Collective Bargaining in the United Kingdom,” 123 International Labour Review 287.Google Scholar
ROGERS, Joel (1984) “Divide and Conquer: The Legal Foundations of Postwar U.S. Labor Policy.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Politics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
RONGE, Volker (1983) “Rechtsetzung durch Tarifvertrag? Zur Koexistenz von staatlichen und nichtstaatlichen Recht,” in Voigt, 1983.Google Scholar
RONGE, Volker (1980) Am Staat Vorbei. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
ROTTLEUTHNER, Hubert (1986) “Theories of Legal Evolution: Between Empiricism and Philosophy of History,” Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 9.Google Scholar
SAMUEL, G. (1983) “Public and Private Law: A Private Lawyer's Response,” 46 The Modern Law Review 558.Google Scholar
SCHMITT, Carl (1928) Verfassungslehre. Munich: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
SCHMITTER, P. C. (1979) “Modes of Interest Intermediation and Models of Societal Change in Western Europe,” in Schmitter and Lehmbruch, 1979.Google Scholar
SCHMITTER, P. C., and G., LEHMBRUCH (eds.) (1979) Trends towards Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1947) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 2nd Ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
SEIBEL, W. (1980) “Abschied vom Recht—Eine Ideologie?” in Voigt, R. (ed.), Verrechtlichung. Königstein: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
SELZNICK, P. (1969) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
SELZNICK, P. (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
SHKLAR, J. (1964) Legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
SIMITIS, S. (1983) “Zur Verrechtlichung der Arbeitsbeziehungen,” in Kuebler, F. (ed.), Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität: Vergleichende Analysen. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
SIMITIS, S. (1957) Die faktischen Vertragsverhältnisse als Ausdruck der gewandelten sozialen Funktion der Rechtsinstitute des Privatrechts. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
SINZHEIMER, H. (1976) Arbeitsrecht und Rechtssoziologie, 2 vols., ed. O. Kahn-Freund. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
SINZHEIMER, H. (1933) “Die Krisis des Arbeitsrechts,” reprinted in Sinzheimer, 1976, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
SINZHEIMER, H. (1929) “Die Reform des Schlichtungswesens,” in Berichte über der l. Generalversammlung der Gesellschaft für soziale Reform. Mannheim.Google Scholar
SINZHEIMER, H. (1927) Grundzüge des Arbeitsrechts, 2nd Ed. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
SINZHEIMER, H. (1923) “Das neue Arbeitsrecht in Deutschland,” 1 Die Internationale Gewerkschaftsbewegung 12.Google Scholar
STREEK, Wolfgang, and P. C., SCHMITTER (1985) Private Interest Government. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.) (1986) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.) (1984a) “Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Their Beneficiaries: A Functional Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility,” in Hopt, K. J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities: Legal, Economic and Sociological Analyses of Corporate Responsibility. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.) (1984b) “Verrechtlichung—Begriffe, Merkmale, Grenzen, Auswege,” in Kuebler, F. (ed.), Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Sozialer Solidarität: Vergleichende Analysen. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.) (1983) “Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Laws,” 17 Law & Society Review 239.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.) (1982) “Reflexives Recht,” 68 Archiv fuer Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 13.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther, and Helmuth, WILLKE (1984) “Kontext und Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeruerung durch reflexives Recht,” 1984 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 4.Google Scholar
TOMLINS, Christopher L. (1985) The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TRATTNER, Walter I. (ed.) (1983) Social Welfare or Social Control? Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
TRIBE, Laurence H. (1979) “Too Much Law, Too Little Justice: An Argument for Delegalizing America,” The Atlantic 25 (July 10).Google Scholar
TROY, Leo, and Neil, SHEFLIN (1985) Union Sourcebook. West Orange, NJ: IRDIS.Google Scholar
UNGER, R. M. (1983) “The Critical Legal Studies Movement,” 96 Harvard Law Review 563.Google Scholar
UNGER, R. M. (1976) Law in Modern Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (1916) Industrial Relations: Final Report and Testimony Submitted to Congress by the Commission on Industrial Relations Created by the Act of August 23, 1912, 64th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Document No. 415. Vol. 1, Reports, Vol. 2, Cloak, Suit, and Waist Industry and A. F. of L., Socialists, and Industrial Workers, Vol. 11, Labor and the Law.Google Scholar
VAN DEN BERGH, G.C.J.J. (1983) “Schijnbewegingen, hercodificatie en eigendomsdefinitie in historisch perspectief,” in Liber Amicorum John Gilissen. Antwerp: Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen.Google Scholar
VAN PEIJPE, Taco (1985) De ontwikkeling van het loonvormingsrecht. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.Google Scholar
VAN PEIJPE, Taco (1984) “Hugo Sinzheimer en het Nederlandse arbeidsrecht,” 10 Recht en Kritiek 7.Google Scholar
VOIGT, Rüdiger (ed.) (1986) Limitations of Law: An Interdisciplinary Symposium. Discussion Papers of the Center for Studies on Changing Norms and Mobility, No. 65/85, Siegen University, West Germany.Google Scholar
VOIGT, Rüdiger (ed.) (1983) “Verrechtlichung und Entrechtlichung: Entwicklungslinien regulativen Rechts im Wohlfahrtsstaat,” in Voigt, R. (ed.), Abschied vom Recht? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
VOIGT, Rüdiger (ed.) (1980) “Verrechtlichung in Staat und Gesellschaft,” in Voigt, R. (ed.), Verrechtlichung. Königstein: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
VON MISES, Ludwig (1949) Human Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
WEBER, M. (1978) Economy and Society, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WEDDERBURN, Lord, Roy, LEWIS, and J., CLARK (1983) Labour Law and Industrial Relations: Building on Kahn-Freund. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
WEILER, Paul (1983) “Promises to Keep: Securing Workers' Rights to Self-Organization under the NLRA,” 96 Harvard Law Review 1769.Google Scholar
WILENSKY, Harold L. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WILLKE, Helmuth (1983) Entzauberung des Staates. Königstein: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
WILSON, J. Q. (ed.) (1980) The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1975) “Note: The Wyatt Case: Implementation of a Judicial Decree Ordering Institutional Change,” 84 Yale Law Journal 1138.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Wyatt v. Aderholt, 503 F.2d (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

U.S. Const. Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment..Google Scholar