Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:34:24.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Realism and the Burden of Symbolism: The Correspondence of Thurman Arnold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Warren J. Samuels
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study uses the recently published correspondence of Thurman W. Arnold to examine his work in legal realism, symbols, power, and antitrust. It focuses on how Arnold, seeing symbols as functional, not merely insubstantial, was quite comfortable in pursuing a successful career within the system and using symbols to affect behavior, as in his antitrust work.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , Summer 1979 , pp. 997 - 1011
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to thank John Henry Schlegel, Elizabeth Johnston, Stewart Macaulay, Joel Grossman, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of the article.

References

ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1935) The Symbols of Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1937) The Folklore of Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1940) The Bottlenecks of Business. New York: Reynal and Hitchcock.Google Scholar
ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1957) “Judge Jerome Frank,” 24 University of Chicago Law Review 633.Google Scholar
GRESSLEY, Gene M. (ed.) (1977) Voltaire and the Cowboy: The Letters of Thurman Arnold. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.Google Scholar