Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:31:35.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers Judge the Warren Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Edward N. Beiser
Edward N. Beiser*
Affiliation:
Brown University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One special public which presumably pays a good deal of attention to the United States Supreme Court is the bar. As part of the “company” attached to the judiciary, attorneys may have a philosophic interest — and surely have a bread-and-butter interest — in the activities of the country's highest tribunal. This article seeks to explore that concern.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 7 , Issue 1: Special Issue on European Sociology of Law , Fall 1972 , pp. 139 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1972.

References

BEANEY, William, and Edward N., BEISER (1965) “Prayer and Politics: the Impact of Engle and Schempp on the Political Process,” 13 Journal of Public Law 475.Google Scholar
DOLBEARE, Kenneth M. (1967) “The Public Views the Supreme Court,” in Herbert, JACOB (ed.) Law, Politics and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B. (1965) Lawyers and Judges: The A.B.A. and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. (1962) Congress and the Court: A Case Study in the American Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. (1968 “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: A Preliminary Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes,” 2 Law and Society Review 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. (1968) “Public Opinion and Supreme Court: The water Campaign,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar