Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:24:45.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2024

Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a capitalist society the State legal system is in general an instrument of class domination both at the level of the relations of production, as in the factory, and of the relations of reproduction, as in housing. Housing conditions are particularly illustrative of class domination in the squatter settlements of all major cities throughout the capitalist world. Pasargada is the fictitious name of such a settlement in Rio de Janeiro. In a nonrevolutionary situation, and particularly under the yoke of economic and political repression imposed by the fascist State (as in contemporary Brazil), the struggle against housing and living conditions in these settlements is a very hard one. Because of the structural inaccessibility of the State legal system, and especially because of the illegal character of these communities, the dominated classes living in them devise adaptive strategies aimed at securing the minimal social ordering of community relations. One such strategy involves the creation of an internal legality, parallel to (and sometimes conflicting with) State legality—a kind of popular justice. The article describes Pasargada legality from both the inside (through the sociological analysis of legal rhetoric in dispute prevention and dispute settlement) and in its (unequal) relations with the Brazilian official legal system (from the perspective of legal pluralism).

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Fall 1977 , pp. 5 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This is a shortened and revised version of my doctoral thesis, submitted to Yale Law School in 1973 with the title “Law against Law: Legal Reasoning in Pasargada Law.” I am grateful to Ivan Illich for his kind interest in my work, which led to its publication in English by CIDOC (Centro Intercultural de Documentacion, Cuernavaca, Mexico) in 1974. At different stages of the development of this study many friends offered me valuable help and advice both as to scientific content and as to style. I am specially indebted to Richard Abel, David Trubek, Laura Nader, Richard Schwartz, Leon Lipson, Marc Galanter, Mara Taub, Stanton Wheeler, Donald Black, and William Felstiner.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
ARISTOTLE (1909) The Rhetoric of Aristotle, Translated by Jebb, Sir Richard Claverhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ARISTOTLE (1952) Die Lehrschriften: Topik II. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1971) “The Social Organization of Arrest,” 23 Stanford Law Review 1087.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgement among the Tiv. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1967) “The Differing Realms of the Law,” in Bohannan, Paul (ed.) Law and Warfare. Garden City, N.Y.: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar
CAGE, John (1966) Silence: Lectures and Writings. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
CAPELLETTI, Mauro, James, GORDLEY and Earl, JOHNSON Jr. (1975) Toward Equal Justice: A Comparative Study of Legal Aid in Modem Societies (Text and Materials). Milano: Dott. A. Guiffrè and Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (1977) “Prisons and the Future of Control Systems: From Concentration to Dispersal.” Presented at the Fifth Conference of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, Barcelona, September.Google Scholar
CORDOVIL, Ana Maria (1965) “Sociedade de Moradores num Programa do D.O.C. (Uma Experiencia na SOMAC).” Mimeo, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
COSER, Lewis (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
CURTIUS, Ernst R. (1963) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, A.L. (ed.) (1967a) The Craft of Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, A.L. (1967b) “The Case Method in the Field of Law” in Epstein, A.L. (ed.) (1967a) 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESSER, Josef (1956) Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
ESSER, Josef (1970) Vorverständniss und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
FALLERS, Lloyd (1969) Law without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1955) The Judicial Process among theBarotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press and Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1967) “Introduction” in Epstein, A.L. (ed.) (1967a) xi.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1971a) Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1971b) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GORZ, Andre (ed.) (1976) The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class-Struggle in Modern Capitalism, Translated by Mepham, J.. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
GOULART, José Alipio (1957) “Favelas do Distrito Federal,” Estudos Brasileiros, No. 9. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Agricultura, Serviço de Informação Agricola.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Phillip (1963) Social Control in an African Society. Social Control in an African Society: Agricultural Masai of Northern Tanganyika. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Phillip (1969) “Introduction to Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies,” in Nader, Laura (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
HEGEL, G.W.F. (1969) Wissenschaft der Logik I; II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. (Translated by A.V. Miller, London: Allen & Unwin.).Google Scholar
HOOKER, M.B. (1975) Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
ILLICH, Ivan (1973) Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
ILLICH, Ivan (1977) Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Terence (1972) Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Terence (1973) “Imperialism and the Professions: Notes on the Development of Professional Occupations in Britain's Colonies and the New States,” in The Sociological Review Monograph, no. 20, 281.Google Scholar
KANTOROWICZ, Hermann (1958) The Definition of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
KELSEN, Hans (1962) Teoria Pura do Direito, 2d ed., vol. II. Coimbra, Portugal: Armenio Amado.Google Scholar
LEEDS, Anthony A. (1964) “Brazilian Careers and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Model and Case History,” 66 American Anthropologist 1321.Google Scholar
LEEDS, Anthony A. (1969) “The Significant Variables Determining the Character of Squatter Settlements,” 12(3) America Latina 44.Google Scholar
LEEDS, Elizabeth A. (1970) “Games Favelas Play.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
LEVI, Edward (1948) An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MEDINA, Carlos Alberto (1964) A Favela e o Demagogo. São Paulo: Martins.Google Scholar
MEDINA, Carlos Alberto (1969) “A Favela como uma Estrutura Atomistica. Elementos Descritivos e Constitutivos,” 12(3) America Latina 112.Google Scholar
MEUREN, Walter (1959), “Breves Considerações sobre a lei das Favelas,” [1959] Revista Forense 462.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally (1970) “Politics, Procedure and Norms in Changing Chagga Law,” 40 Africa (Journal of the International African Institute) 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NADER, Laura (1969) “Styles of Court Procedures: To Make the Balance,” in Nader, Laura (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
PERELMAN, Chaim and L., OLBRECHTS-TYTECA (1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, Translated by Wilkinson, John and Weaver, Purcell. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
POSPISIL, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
QUEIROZ, Maria Isaura P. de (1969) “Favelas Urbanas, Favelas Rurais,” 7 Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros da Universidade de São Paulo 81.Google Scholar
RECASÉNS-SICHES, Luis (1962) “The Logic of the Reasonable as Differentiated from the Logic of the Rational (Human Reason in the Making and the Interpretation of the Law)” in Newman, R.A. (ed.) Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
RENNER, Karl (1949) The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Function. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
RENOU, Louis (1968) Religions of Ancient India. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
RIOS, José Arthur (1960) “El Pueblo y el Politico,” 6 Politica 12.Google Scholar
RIOS, José Arthur (1961) “Operação Mutirão,” 4 (12) Cuadernos Latino-Americanos de Economia Humana 250.Google Scholar
SAGMACS (1960) “Aspectos Humanos da Favela Carioca. Estudo Socio-Economico elaborado por SAGMACS.” Part I, in Estado de São Paulo, April 13 (suplemento especial); Part II, in Estado de São Paulo, April 15 (suplemento especial).Google Scholar
SANTOS, SANTOS Boaventura de (1973) “La loi contre la loi,” 41 (7-8) Esprit 67.Google Scholar
SANTOS, SANTOS Boaventura de (1974) Law Against Law: Legal Reasoning in Pasargada Law. Cuernavaca: Centro Intercultural de Documentacion.Google Scholar
SANTOS, SANTOS Boaventura de (1976) “Law and Revolution in Portugal. The Experiences of Popular Justice after the 25th of April 1974.” Presented at the Fourth Conference of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, Vienna.Google Scholar
SCULL, Andrew T. (1977) Decarceration. Decarceration: A Radical View. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
SHANKARA (ŚANKARACARYA) (1970) Crest-Jewel of Discrimination. New York.Google Scholar
SILVA, Luis A.M. (1967) “A Politica na Favela,” 9(3) Cademos Brasileiros 35.Google Scholar
SILVA, Luis A.M. (1969) “O Significado do Botequim,” 12(3) America Latina 160.Google Scholar
SILVA, Luis A.M. and dos SANTOS, C.N.F. (1969) “Favela et Politique,” 186 Economie et Humanisme 44.Google Scholar
SIMMEL, Georg (1955) Conflict, Translated by Wolff, Kurt H.. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
STEINBECK, John (1939) The Grapes of Wrath. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
STEINER, George (1967) Language and Silence: Essays on Language, Literature and the Inhuman. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
SWETT, Daniel H. (1969) “Cultural Bias in the American Legal System,” 4 Law & Society Review 79.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David M. (1972) “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” [1972] Wisconsin Law Review 720.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto M. (1975) Knowledge and Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto M. (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
VALLADARES, Licia (1968) “Una Favela Por Dentro,” 29 Mundo Nuevo 19.Google Scholar
VAN VELSEN, J. (1967) “The Extended-Case Method and Situational Analysis” in Epstein, A.L. (ed.) (1967a) 129.Google Scholar
VICO, Giovanni Battista (1708) De Nostri Temporis Studiorum Ratione. Napoli: Libreria editrice Francesco Pirella.Google Scholar
VIEHWEG, Theodor (1963) Topik und Jurisprudenz, 2d Ed. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1954) Law in Economy and Society, edited by Max Rheinstein. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1970) Decision-Making and Dispute Settlement in a Swedish Fishing Village: An Ethnography of Law. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar