Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:52:29.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law in The Kibbutz: A Reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2024

Allan E. Shapiro
Allan E. Shapiro*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between social structure and the development of legal institutions is the central theme in the classic study-by Richard Schwartz, now more than two decades old, “Social Factors in the Development of Legal Control: A Case Study of Two Israeli Settlements” (1954). The article is based on an examination of the systems of control developed in two rural communities, one a kibbutz (or kvutza), based on social and economic collectivism; the other a moshav, a cooperative settlement with private property and social life geared to the nuclear family. Internal controls in both communities were exercised through a General Assembly, composed of all members, and by a number of specialized committees. In contrast to the moshav, which had a Judicial Committee performing an adjudicatory function, Schwartz found that the kibbutz “had no distinctly legal institution” and that its control system “must be considered informal rather than legal” since public opinion constituted its sole sanction (Schwartz, 1954: 471,476).

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Spring 1976 , pp. 415 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

I would like to acknowledge the helpful comments and patient assistance of Richard Abel and Marc Galanter. Special thanks go to Shmariyahu Bar-hon, veteran member and archivist of Degania Aleph, for making available the treasury of source material on which this essay is based. Veteran members of the kibbutz have given freely of their time in helping to fill the gaps in the written record. Interpretations of the case material presented are, of course, the sole responsibility of the author.

References

BALDWIN, Elaine (1972) Differentiation and Cooperation in an Israeli Veteran Moshav. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
BICKEL, Alexander M. (1962) The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
DAVIS, Kenneth C. (1972) Administrative Law Text (3d Edition). St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
DAYAN, Shmuel (1935) Im Hetzi Yoval Shanim Shel Degania [With the Half-Jubilee of Degania]. Tel-Aviv: Shtibel.Google Scholar
DIAMOND, Stanley (1957) “Kibbutz and Shtetl: The History of an Idea,” 5 Social Problems 71.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon L. (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
HAROUVI, Hayim (1962) HaShiput HaTnuati [Movement Adjudication]. Tel-Aviv: The Moshav Movement Secretariat.Google Scholar
KAMENKA, Eugene and Alice Erh-Soon, TAY (1971) “Beyond the French Revolution: Communist Socialism and the Concept of Law,” 21 University of Toronto Law Journal 109.Google Scholar
KAMENKA, Eugene (1973) “Beyond Bourgeois Individualism: The Contemporary Crisis in Law and Legal Ideology.” Paper presented at the World Congress on the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Madrid.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally F. (1969) “Comparative Studies: Introduction,” in Nader, L. (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
OFER, Yaacov (1972) “[Complaint and Decisions in Connection with Sanctions in the Moshav],” 14-17 Telemim: Journal of the Moshav Movement 14 (April 1972) In [Hebrew].Google Scholar
OFER, Yaacov (1971) “[On Sanctions in the Moshav],” 18, 34 Telemim: Journal of the Moshav Movement 18 (January 1971) [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
POSPOSIL, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
REICH, Charles A. (1966) “The New Property,” 3 The Public Interest 57 (Spring).Google Scholar
ROSNER, Menahem (1973) “Direct Democracy in the Kibbutz,” in Kanter, R. (ed.) Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
ROTHMAN, Rozann and AUan E., SHAPIRO (1974) “Conflict Resolution in an Israeli Kibbutz,” 2 Peace and Change 29.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D. (1954) “Social Factors in the Development of Legal Control: A Case Study of Two Israeli Settlements,” 63 Yale Law Journal 471.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D. (1957) “Democracy and Collectivism in the Kibbutz,” 5 Social Problems 137.Google Scholar
VA'ADAT, HAKVUTZOT [Committee of the Kvutzot] (1925) HaKvutza: Ma'asof L'Inyanai HaKvutza VeChayaiha [The Kvutza: A Collection on Matters of the Kvutza and Its Life]. Tel-Aviv: Histadrut HaOvdim [General Federation of Hebrew Workers], Va'adat HaTarbut [Cultural Committee].Google Scholar
WEISMAN, Joshua (1966) “The Kibbutz: Israel's Collective Settlement,” 1 Israel Law Review 99.Google Scholar
ZBOROWSKI, Mark and Elizabeth, HERZOG (1952) Life is With People: The Jewish Little-Town of Eastern Europe. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar