Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:42:02.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language in the Legal Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Brenda Danet
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This review essay analyzes the relation between language and the two basic functions of law, the ordering of social relations and the restoration of social order when it breaks down. One main theme is the linguistic description of legal language and the sociolinguistic and sociolegal limitations on its reform. Drawing on a basic distinction between the nature of discourse in play, ritual, and the “serious” mode of everyday life, the essay goes on to contrast “play” genres of disputing with “fact”-oriented genres. An overview of the forms and functions of play genres of disputing is followed by a discussion of the management of three main aspects of “facf'-oriented disputes: the substance of arguments, linguistic form, and language and silence. Narrative and questioning modes of claim construction are contrasted. The notion of “thickening” in legal language is presented, and five possible explanations for this phenomenon are explored. The essay concludes with a discussion of topics for future debate and research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 14 , Issue 3: Contemporary Issues in Law and Social Science , Spring 1980 , pp. 445 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

I wish to thank colleagues and friends at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for their suggestions, comments, and encouragement: Bryna Bogoch, Daniel Dayan, Don Handelman, Uriel Procaccia, Yizhak Roeh, Lea Shamgar-Handelman, and Benny Shanon. Over the last five years I have had stimulating conversations about language and law with the following, among others: Max Atkinson, Veda and Bob Charrow, Bruce Fraser, Michael Hancher, Ken Hoffman, Beth Loftus, Paz Buenaventura Naylor, Mack O'Barr, Mike Parkinson, and Susan Philips. I thank them, as well as all the others, too numerous to mention, who sent me materials on language and law, sometimes unsolicited. My work in this area has been supported by the Law and Social Science Program of the National Science Foundation (Grant No. SOC-74-23503), the Israel Ford Foundation, and The Hebrew University Social Science Faculty. Special thanks to Rick Abel for his advice, encouragement, excellent leads, and, most of all, patience, during the preparation of this essay.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1969) “Customary Laws of Wrongs in Kenya: An Essay in Research Method,” 17 American Journal of Comparative Law 573.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1970) “Case Method Research in the Customary Laws of Wrongs in Kenya: Part II: Statistical Analysis,” 6 East African Law Journal 20.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 215.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1979a) “Socializing the Legal Profession: Can Redistributing Lawyers' Services Achieve Social Justice?” 1 Law & Policy Quarterly 5.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1979b) “Delegalization: A Critical Review of Its Ideology, Manifestations, and Social Consequences,” in Blankenburg, E., Klausa, E., and Rottleuthner, H. (eds.) Alternative Rechstformen und Alternativen zum Recht, 6 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechstheorie. Opladen, West Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
ABRAHAMS, Roger D. (1962) “Playing the Dozens,” 75 Journal of American Folklore 209.Google Scholar
ABRAHAMS, Roger D. (1968) “Introductory Remarks to a Rhetorical Theory of Folklore,” 81 Journal of American Folklore 143.Google Scholar
ABRAHAMS, Roger D. (1972) “Joking: the Training of the Man of Words in Talking Broad,” in Kochman, Thomas (ed.) Rappin' and Stylin' Out: Communication in Urban Black America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
ABRAHAMS, Roger D. (1974) “Black Talking on the Streets” in Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds.) The Ethnography of Speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ABRAMS, M.H. (1961) A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
ADLER, Keith (1976) Doctor-Patient Communication: A Shift to Problem-Oriented Research,“ 3 Human Communication Research 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AIKEN, Ray J. (1960) “Let's Not Oversimplify Legal Language,” 32 Rocky Mountain Law Review 358.Google Scholar
ALBERT, Ethel (1972) “Culture Patterning of Speech Behavior in Burundi,” in Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1979) “Plea Bargaining and Its History,” 13 Law & Society Review 211.Google Scholar
ARENDT, Hannah (1964) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1935) The Symbols of Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ATKINSON, J. Maxwell (1979) “Displaying Neutrality: Management of an Interactional Problem in Small Claims Court Hearings.” Presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University of Bristol, July 16-20.Google Scholar
ATKINSON, J. Maxwell and Paul, DREW (1979) Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Behavior in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AUBERT, Vilhelm (1969) “Some Social Functions of Legislation” in Aubert, V. (ed.) The Sociology of Law. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, J.S. (1974) Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modem America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
AUSTIN, John (1873) Lectures on Jurisprudence. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
AUSTIN, J.L. (1970a) Philosophical Papers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
AUSTIN, J.L. (1970b) How to Do Things With Words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BADDELEY, A.D. and D., SCOTT (1971) “Word Frequency and the Unit Sequence Interference Hypothesis in Short-Term Memory.” 10 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 34.Google Scholar
BANKOWSKI, Zenon and Geoff, MUNGHAM (1976) Images of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
BARBER, Bernard (1980) Informed Consent in Medical Research and Therapy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
BARBER, C.L. (1962) “Some Measurable Characteristics of Modern Scientific Prose,” in Behre, Frank (ed.) Contributions to English Syntax and Philology (Gothenburg Studies in English 14). Gothenberg, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
BARNSLEY, Roger H., J. Don, READ, Kim, ANKERS and Ian Q., WHISHAW (1977) “The Generality of the Presupposition Effect in Eyewitness Testimony.” Lethbridge, England: University of Lethbridge (Research Bulletin 77-01) [mimeo].Google Scholar
BARZUN, Jacques (1978) “The Professions Under Siege.” Harper's 61 (October).Google Scholar
BATES, Elizabeth (1976) Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BATESON, Gregory (1972) “A Theory of Play and Fantasy,” in Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
BAUGH, A.C. (1962) “Gift of Style,” 34 Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly 101.Google Scholar
BAUMAN, Richard and Joel, SHERZER (eds.) (1974) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BEARDSLEY, Charles A. (1941) “Beware of, Eschew and Avoid Pompous Prolixity and Platitudinous Epistles,” 16 California State Bar Journal 65.Google Scholar
BEGG, I. and A., PAIVIO (1969) “Concreteness and Imagery in Sentence Meaning,” 8 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 821.Google Scholar
BELL, Roger T. (1976) Sociolinguistics. London: B.T. Batsford.Google Scholar
BENTHAM, Jeremy (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham (John Bowring, ed.) Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
BERGER, Peter L. and Thomas, LUCKMANN (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor.Google Scholar
BISHIN, William R. and Christopher P., STONE (1972) Law, Language and Ethics. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
BISKIND, Elliott L. (1967) “Communication Through Writing,” 39 New York State Bar Journal 330.Google Scholar
BLACK, Mary B. (1973) “Ojibwa Questioning Etiquette and Use of Ambiguity,” 23 Studies in Linguistics 13.Google Scholar
BLOCH, Maurice (ed.) (1975) Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Philip W., Kathryn Groves, CARSSOW, Janet, HALL, Barbara, HAWKINS, Ronald, HOFFMAN, Ernest, ISHEM, Caroll Palmer, MAURER, Dana, SPENS, John, TAYLOR and Donald Lee, ZIMMERMAN (1974) “The Honoring of Accounts,” 39 American Sociological Review 4.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BOLINGER, Dwight (1973) “Truth Is a Linguistic Question,” 49 Language 539.Google Scholar
BOLINGER, Dwight (1975) Aspects of Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
BOSMAJIAN, Haig (1974) The Language of Oppression. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, B.A. (1970) “Are Lawyers Lousy Writers?” 6 Georgia State Bar Journal 285.Google Scholar
BOYD, Richard (1979) “Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is a Metaphor For?” in Ortony, Andrew (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BRENNEIS, Donald and Master Ram, PADARATH (1975) “'About Those Scoundrels I'll Let Everyone Know,' Challenge Singing in a Fiji Indian Community,” 88 Journal of American Folklore 283.Google Scholar
BRENNEIS, Donald and Laura, LEIN (1977) “'You Fruithead': A Sociolinguistic Approach to Children's Dispute Settlement” in Ervin-Tripp, Susan and Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.) Child Discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BRESNAHAN, Mary I. (1979) “Linguistic Limbo: The Case of the Non-native English-Speaking Defendant in the American Courtroom.” Presented at the Ninth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Montreal.Google Scholar
BRIGHAM, John (1978) Constitutional Language: An Interpretation of Judicial Decision. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
BROWN, Rap (1969) Die Nigger Die. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
BROWN, Roger and Marguerite, FORD (1964) “Address in American English,” in Hymes, Dell (ed.) Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
BROWN, Roger and A., GILMAN (1972) “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity,” in Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.) Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
BURGER, Warren (1973) “The Special Skills of Advocacy: Are Specialized Training and Certification of Advocates Essential in Our System of Justice?” 42 Fordham Law Review 227.Google Scholar
BUSCH, F.X. (1960) Law and Tactics in Jury Trials. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
BUSH, Douglas (1972) “Polluting Our Language,” in Disch, Robert (eds.) The Future of Literacy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
CAILLOIS, R. (1961) Man, Play and Games (trans. M. Barash). New York; Free Press.Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen (1979) “The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception,” 7 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 331.Google Scholar
CAPLAN, Jonathan (1977) “Lawyers and Litigants: A Cult Reviewed,“ in Illich, Ivan, Zola, Irving K., McKnight, John, Caplan, Jonathan, and Shaiken, Harley, Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
CARLEN, Pat (1976) Magistrates' Justice. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E., Jan, HOWARD and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1967) Civil Justice and the Poor. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
CHAMPAGNOL, R. (1971) “Genetic Evolution of the Reading Speed of Words in Relation to Their Frequency,” 71 Année Psychologique 407.Google Scholar
CHARROW, Robert P. and Veda R., CHARROW (1976) “Lawyers' Views of the Comprehensibility of Legal Language.” Presented at the Fifth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., October.Google Scholar
CHARROW, Robert P. (1979) “Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions,” 79 Columbia Law Review 1306.Google Scholar
CHARROW, Veda R. and Jo Ann, CRANDALL (1978) “Legal Language: What Is It and What Can We Do About It?” Arlington, Va.: American Institutes for Research and Center for Applied Linguistics (unpublished).Google Scholar
CHOMSKY, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
CHRISTIE, George C. (1964) “Vagueness & Legal Language,” 48 Minnesota Law Review 888.Google Scholar
CHURCHILL, Lindsey (1978) Questioning Strategies in Sociolinguistics. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
CICOUREL, Aaron (1968) The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
CLAVTR, Judy and John, SPITZER (eds.) (1970) The Conspiracy Trial. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
COLE, Peter (ed.) (1978) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
COMMONWEALTH OF MASS. v. KENNETH EDELIN (1975), vols. 1-30.Google Scholar
CONLEY, John M. and O'BARR, William M. (1977) “Behavioral Analysis of the American Criminal Courtroom,” Durham, N.C.: Duke University Law and Language Project (Research Report 4).Google Scholar
CONLEY, John, O'BARR, William M. and E. Allan, LIND (1978) “The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom,” 1978 Duke Law Journal 1375.Google Scholar
CONRAD, Edwin C. (1956) Modern Trial Evidence. St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
CORNISH, E.R., and P.C., WASON (1970) “The Recall of Affirmative and Negative Sentences in an Incidental Learning Task,” 22 Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COTTLE, Basil (1975) The Plight of English. New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House.Google Scholar
COULTHARD, Malcolm (1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
CUTLER, Susan (1979) “Attorney Strategies in Witness Interrogation in the Courtroom” (unpublished).Google Scholar
CRYSTAL, David and Derek, DAVY (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
DAGAN, Daniel (1979) “Impossible German,” Ha'aretz, Nov. 9 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
DALE, E. and J.S., CHALL (1948) Readability. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
DAMASKA, Mirjan (1975) “Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure,” 84 Yale Law Journal 480.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1973) “‘Giving the Underdog a Break’: Latent Particularism Among Customs Officials,” in Katz, Elihu and Danet, Brenda (eds.) Bureaucracy and the Public: A Reader in Official-Client Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1976a) “Speaking of Watergate: Language and Moral Accountability,” 4 Centrum 135 (Working Papers of the Minnesota Center for Advanced Studies in Language, Style, and Literary Theory).Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1976b) “Sociolinguistic Patterns in the Watergate Hearings” (unpublished).Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1976c) “The Case of the Tell-tale Tapes, or Richard Nixon's Accountability for the Watergate Cover-up” (unpublished).Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1977) “Who Killed Thomas Becket?” (unpublished).Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1980a) “Client-Organization Relationships,” in Nystrom, Paul C. and Starbuck, William H. (eds.) 2 Handbook of Organizational Design: Remodeling Organizations and Their Environments. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1980b) “‘Baby’ or 'Fetus'? Language and the Construction of Reality in a Manslaughter Trial,” 8 Semiotica (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1980c) “Language in the Courtroom,” in Giles, Howard, Smith, Philip, and Robinson, Peter (eds.) Social Psychology and Language: Proceedings of an International Conference. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda(n.d.) ”Baby“ or ”Fetus“? Language and the Construction of Reality in a Manslaughter Trial.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda and Bryna, BOGOCH (1980a) “Fixed Fight or Free-for-All? An Empirical Study of Combativeness in the Adversary System of Justice,” 7 British Journal of Law and Society (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DANET, Brenda (1980b) “Communication and Procedural Justice in American and Israeli Criminal Trials.” Presented at the Annual Meeting, Law and Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin, June.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda, Kenneth B., HOFFMAN and Nicole C., KERMISH (1980a) “Accountability for Verbal Offenses,” 9 International Journal of the Sociology of Law (in press).Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda, Kenneth B., HOFFMAN, Nicole E., KERMISH, H. Jeffrey, RAFN and Deborah G., STAYMAN (1980b) “An Ethnography of Questioning,” in Shuy, Roger and Shnukal, Anna (eds.) Language Use and the Uses of Language: Papers from the Fifth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda and Nicole C., KERMISH (1978) “Courtroom Questioning: A Sociolinguistic Perspective,” in Massery, Louis N. II (ed.) Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy. Washington, D.C.: Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National College of Advocacy.Google Scholar
DANET, Brenda and H. Jeffrey, RAFN (1977) “Strategies of Control in Courtroom Questioning.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, August.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Arlene K. (1971) “How Free Should Professions Be?” in Freidson, Eliot (ed.) The Professions and Their Prospects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
DAVIS, Jeffrey (1977) “Protecting Consumers from Overdisclosure and Gobbledygook: An Empirical Look at the Simplification of Consumer-Credit Contracts.” 63 Virginia Law Review 841.Google Scholar
DAVISON, Alice (1976) “Linguistic Analysis and the Law.” Presented at the Fifth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., October.Google Scholar
DELLINGER, David T. (1970) Contempt: Transcript of the Contempt Citations, Sentences and Responses of the Chicago Conspiracy 10. Chicago: Swallow Press.Google Scholar
DICK, Robert C. (1959) “Legal Language,” 2 Canadian Bar Journal 204. DICKERSON, F.R. (1965) The Fundamentals of Legal Drafting. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
DOLLARD, John (1939) “The Dozens': The Dialect of Insult,” 1 American Image 3.Google Scholar
DOWNES, W.J. (1978) “Language, Belief and Verbal Action in an Historical Process,” 8 University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics 1.Google Scholar
DRESSLER, Wolfgang U. (1978) Current Trends in Text Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUKER, W.F. and J., BASTIAN (1966) “Recall of Abstract and Concrete Words Equated on Meaningfulness,” 5 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 455.Google Scholar
DUNCAN, CP. (1973) “Storage and Retrieval of Low Frequency Words,” 1 Memory and Cognition 129.Google Scholar
DUNDES, Alan (ed.) (1973) Mother Wit from the Laughing Barrel. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
DUNDES, Alan, Jerry W., LEACH and Bora, OZKOK (1972) “The Strategy of Turkish Boys' Verbal Dueling Rhymes,” in Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1972) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1977) Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
ELWORK, Amiram, Bruce D., SALES and James J., ALFINI (1977) “Juridic Decisions: In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It?” 1 Law and Human Behavior 163.Google Scholar
EMERSON, Robert M. (1969) Judging Delinquents. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
ERICKSON, Bonnie, E. Allan, LIND, Bruce C., JOHNSON and O'BARR, William M. (1978) “Speech Style and Impression Formation in a Court Setting: The Effects of ‘Power’ and ‘Powerless’ Speech,” 14 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 266.Google Scholar
ERVIN-TRIPP, Susan (1972) “On Sociolinguistic Rules: Alternation and Cooccurrence,” in Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
ERVIN-TRIPP, Susan (1976) “Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives,” 5 Language in Society 25.Google Scholar
FALLERS, Lloyd (1969) Law Without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1979) The Process Is the Punishment. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
FERGUSON, Charles (1964) “Diglossia,” in Hymes, Dell (ed.) Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
FILLMORE, Charles (1973) “A Grammarian Looks to Sociolinguistics,” in Shuy, Roger W. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
FILMER, Paul, Michael, PHILLIPSON, David, SILVERMAN and David, WALSH (1973) New Directions in Sociological Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
FINE PRINT (1979a) “International Scene: Krångelsvenska,” Fine Print 4 (November).Google Scholar
FINE PRINT (1979b) “International Scene: Great Britain,” Fine Print 1 (December).Google Scholar
FISHMAN, Joshua A. (1971) Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
FLESCH, Rudolf (1974) The Art of Readable Writing. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
FLESCH, Rudolf (1979) How to Write Plain English: A Book for Lawyers and Consumers.Google Scholar
FODOR, J. and M., GARRETT (1967) “Some Syntactic Determinants of Sentential Complexity,” 2 Perception and Psychophysics 289.Google Scholar
FORSTER, K.K. and L.A., RYDER (1971) “Perceiving the Structure and Meaning of Sentences,” 10 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 285.Google Scholar
FOWLER, Roger (ed.) (1966) Essays on Style and Language: Linguistic and Critical Approaches to Literary Style. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
FOX, James J. (1974) “Our Ancestors Spoke in Pairs: Rotinese Views of Language, Dialect and Code,“ in Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
FRAKE, Charles O. (1969) “Struck by Speech,” in Nader, Laura (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1930) Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano's.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1966) Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
FRANKEL, Marvin E. (1975) “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,” 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1031.Google Scholar
FRASER, Bruce (1979) “Mitigation in Conversation” (unpublished).Google Scholar
FREEDMAN, Monroe H. (1975) Lawyers' Ethics in an Adversary System. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
FREIDSON, Eliot (1970) “Dominant Professions, Bureaucracy, and Client Services,” in Rosengren, William R. and Lefton, Mark (eds.) Organizations and Clients: Essays in the Sociology of Service. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1964) “Law and Its Language,” 33 George Washington Law Review 563.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1979) “Plea Bargaining in Historical Perspective,” 13 Law and Society Review 247.Google Scholar
FUTERMAN, Linda and Tamar, LIBES (1979) “Rhetoric in the Name of Justice.” The Communications Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (unpublished).Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GAMBINO, Richard (1973) “Watergate Lingo: A Language of Non-Responsibility,” 22 Freedom at Issue 15 (November-December, 7-9).Google Scholar
GARFINKEL, Harold (1973) “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies,” in Rubington, Earl and Weinberg, Martin S. (eds.) Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
GAZDAR, Gerald (1979) Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GERHART, Eugene C. (1954) “Improving Our Legal Writing: Maxims from the Masters,” 40 American Bar Association Journal 1057.Google Scholar
GERSTL, Joel and Glenn, JACOBS (eds.) (1976) Professions for the People: The Politics of Skill. Cambridge: Schenkman.Google Scholar
GIBBS, Jack P. (1975) Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
GIBBS, James L. Jr. (1962) “Poro Values and Courtroom Procedures in a Kpelle Chief dom,” 18 Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 341. - (1967) ”The Kpelle Moot,“ in Bohannan, Paul (ed.) Law and Warfare. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
GIGLIOLI, Pier Paolo (ed.) (1972) Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
GILES, Howard and Peter F., POWESLAND (1975) Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GILMAN, Andrew (1978) “Telling It Like It Is,” Flightime 51 (Allegheny Airlines, September).Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1955) The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1965a) Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1965b) The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1973) “Cross Examination and the Substantive Law in African Traditional Courts,” n.s. 18 Juridical Review 221.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1967) Interaction Ritual. Garden City, New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1971) Relations in Public. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
GOLDMAN-EISLER, F. and M., COHEN (1971) “Symmetry of Clauses and the Psychological Significance of Left Branching,” 14 Language and Speech 109.Google Scholar
GOODY, Esther N. (1978) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GOODY, Jack (ed.) (1968) Literacy in Traditional Societies. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GORDON, David and George, LAKOFF (1975) “Conversational Postulates,” in Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.) 3 Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GORMAN, A.M. (1961) “Recognition Memory for Nouns as a Function of Abstractness and Frequency,” 61 Journal of Experimental Psychology 23.Google Scholar
GOSSEN, Gary H. (1974) Chamulas in the World of the Sun: Time and Space in a Maya Oral Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
GOSSEN, Gary H. (1976) “Verbal Dueling in Chamula,” in Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara (ed.) Speech Play: Research and Resources for the Study of Linguistic Creativity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
GOTTLIEB, H.J. (1963) “Teaching English in a Law School,” 49 American Bar Association Journal 666.Google Scholar
GRACE, Clive and Philip, WILKINSON (1978) Sociological Inquiry and Legal Phenomena. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
GREENBAUM, E.S. (1956) “Lawyers Talk Too Much,” 19 Federal Rules Decisions 217.Google Scholar
GRICE, H.P. (1975) “Logic and Conversation,” in Cole, and Morgan, (eds.) 3 Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts 41–58. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1963) Social Control in an African Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1969) “Dispute Settlement Without Courts: The Ndendeuli of Southern Tanzania,” in Nader, Laura (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
GUMPERZ, John and Eleanor, HERASIMCHUK (1972) “The Conversational Analysis of Social Meaning: A Study of Classroom Interaction,” in Shuy, Roger W. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
GUMPERZ, John J. and Dell, HYMES (eds.) (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
GUNNING, Robert (1964) How to Take the Fog Out of Writing. Chicago: Dartnell.Google Scholar
GUSFIELD, Joseph (1976) “The Literacy Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research,” 41 American Sociological Review 16.Google Scholar
GUSFIELD, Joseph (1980) Illusions of Authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
GUSTAFSSON, Marita (1975) “Some Syntactic Properites of English Law Language,” Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Department of English (Publication No. 4).Google Scholar
HAGER, John W. (1959) “Let's Simplify Legal Language,” 32 Rocky Mountain Law Review 74.Google Scholar
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya, HASAN (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
HAMILTON, H.W. and J., DEESE (1971) “Comprehensibility and Subject Verb Relation in Complex Sentences,” 10 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 163.Google Scholar
HANCHER, Michael (1979) “The Classification of Cooperative Elocutionary Acts,” 8 Language in Society 1.Google Scholar
HANDELMAN, Don (1977) “Play and Ritual: Complementary Frames of Meta-Communication,” in Chapman, A.J. (ed.) Its a Funny Thing, Humour. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Richard J. (1973) “Answering Questions Containing Marked and Unmarked Adjectives and Adverbs,” 97 Journal of Experimental Psychology 399.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Richard J. (1978) “The Effect of Jury Size and Judge's Instructions on Memory for Pragmatic Implications from Courtroom Testimony,” 99 Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 129.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Richard J., R.R., TESKE and M.J., GINNIS (1975) “Memory for Pragmatic Implications from Courtroom Testimony,” 6 Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 494.Google Scholar
HART, H.L.A. (1951) “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights,” in Flew, A. (ed.) Logic and Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
HARTMANN, R.R.K. and F.C., STORK (1972) Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
HAUG, Marie R. (1975) “The Deprofessionalization of Everyone?” 8 Sociological Focus 197.Google Scholar
HAWKES, Terence (1977) Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAYAKAWA, S.I. (1964) Language in Thought and Action. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
HENRY, Stuart (1976) “Fencing with Accounts: The Language of Moral Bridging, 13 British Journal of Law and Society 91.Google Scholar
HOCKETT, Charles (1958) A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1954) The Law of Primitive Man. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLLAND, V. Melissa and Andrew, ROSE (1980) Understanding Instructions with Complex Conditions. Washington, D.C.: Document Design Research Center.Google Scholar
HOLMES, V.M. (1973) “Order of Main and Subordinate Clauses in Sentence Perception,” 11 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 285.Google Scholar
HOLMSTROM, Lynda Lytle and Ann Wolbert, BURGESS (1978) The Victim of Rape: Institutional Reactions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
HORNBY, P.A. (1974) “Surface Structure and Presupposition,” 13 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 530.Google Scholar
HUIZINGA, J. (1955) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
HUMMEL, Ralph P. (1977) The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
HUTTENLOCHER, J. and S., STRAUSS (1968) “Comprehension and a Statement's Relation to the Situation It Describes,” 7 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 300.Google Scholar
HYMES, Dell (1971) “Competence and Performance in Linguistic Theory,” in Huxley, Renira and Ingram, Elizabeth (eds.) Acquisition of Language: Models and Methods. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
HYMES, Dell (1972) “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life,” in Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
ILLICH, Ivan (1977) Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
JAKOBSON, Roman (1960) “Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics,” in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
JEANS, James W. (1975) Trial Advocacy. St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Bruce C. (1976) “Communicative Competence in American Trial Courtrooms,” 4 Centrum 139 (Working Papers of the Minnesota Center for Advanced Studies in Language, Style and Literary Theory).Google Scholar
JOOS, Martin (1961) The Five Clocks: A Linguistic Excursion into the Five Styles of English Usage. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
JUST, Marcel Adam and P.A., CARPENTER (1971) “Comprehension of Negation with Quantification,” 10 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 244.Google Scholar
JUST, Marcel Adam and Herbert H., CLARK (1973) “Drawing Inferences from the Presuppositions and Implications of Affirmative and Negative Sentences,” 12 Journal of Verbal Behavior 21.Google Scholar
KANFER, Stefan (1973) “Words from Watergate,” 102 Time (August 13).Google Scholar
KASPRYZK, D., D.E., MONTANO and E.F., LOFTUS (1975) “Effects of Leading Questions on Jurors' Verdicts,” 16 Jurimetrics Journal 48.Google Scholar
KATZ, Jerrold J. (1977) Propositional Structure and Elocutionary Force. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
KEARSLEY, Greg P. (1976) “Questions and Question Asking in Verbal Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Review,” 5 Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 355.Google Scholar
KEENAN, Elinor (1975a) “Norm-Makers, Norm-Breakers: Uses of Speech by Men and Women in a Malagasy Community,” in Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Jack (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
KEENAN, Elinor (1975b) “A Sliding Sense of Obligatoriness: The Polystructure of Malagasy Oratory,” in Bloch, Maurice (ed.) Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London: Academic.Google Scholar
KERMISH, Nicole (1975) “Language and the Law: A Review of the Literature.” Boston University Project on “The Role of Language in the Legal Process,” Working Paper No. 1.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert L. (1976) “Language and Litigation in South India,” in O'Barr, William M. and O'Barr, Jean F. (eds.) Language and Politics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
KINTSCH, Walter and D., VIPOND (n.d.) Reading Comprehension and Readability in Educational Practice and Psychological Theory.Google Scholar
KIRSHENBLATT-GIMBLETT, Barbara (ed.) (1976) Speech Play: Research and Resources for the Study of Linguistic Creativity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLARE, George R. (1963) The Measurement of Readability. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
KLARE, George R. (1974-75) “Assessing Readability,” 10 Reading Research Quarterly 62.Google Scholar
KOCH, Klaus-Friedrich (1974) War and Peace in Jalémo. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Ptess.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOCH, Klaus-Friedrich, Soraya, ALTORKI, Andrew, ARNO, and Letitia, HICKSON (1977) “Ritual Reconciliation and the Obviation of Grievances: A Comparative Study in the Ethnography of Law,” 16 Ethnology 269.Google Scholar
KOCHMAN, Thomas (1972) “Toward an Ethnography of Black American Speech Behavior,” in Kochman, T. (ed.) Rappin' and Stylin' Out: Communication in Urban Black America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
LABOV, William (1972a) “The Study of Language in Its Social Context,” in Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.) Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
LABOV, William (1972b) “Rules for Ritual Insults,” in Kochman, Thomas (ed.) Rappin' and Stylin' Out: Communication in Urban Black America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
LABOV, William (1976) “Statement,” Rodgers et al. v. U.S. Steel, February 16, 1976.Google Scholar
LABOV, William and David, FANSHEL (1977) Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
LAKOFF, Robin (1970) “Questionable Answers and Answerable Questions,” in Kachru, Braj B. et al. (eds.) Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. (1977) Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England Under the Ancien Regime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. (1979) “The Short History of Plea Bargaining,” 13 Law & Society Review 261.Google Scholar
LANGUAGE PLANNING NEWSLETTER (1979) “Books and Articles,” 5 Language Planning Newsletter 4 (November).Google Scholar
LAVERY, Urban A. (1921-22) “The Language of the Law,” 7, 8 American Bar Association Journal 277; 269.Google Scholar
LAWSON, Robert G. (1970) “Experimental Research on the Organization of Persuasive Arguments: An Application to Courtroom Communications,” 1970 Law and the Social Order 579.Google Scholar
LEFCOURT, Robert (ed.) (1971) Law Against the People: Essays to Demystify Law, Order and the Courts. New York: Random House (Vintage).Google Scholar
LEODOLTER, Ruth Wodak (1975) Das Sprachverhalten von Angeklagten bei Gericht. Kronberg, West Germany: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
LEODOLTER, Ruth Wodak (1976) “The Language Defendants Use in Court: The Study of Courtroom Interaction from a Sociolinguistic Point of View. Presented at the Seminar on the Sociology of Law and Legal Procedures, Oxford University, May.Google Scholar
LEVINE, Felice J. and June L., TAPP (1977) “The Dialectic of Legal Socialization in Community and School,“ in Tapp, J.L. and Levine, F.J. (eds.) Law, Justice and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN, Jethro K. (1970) The Tyranny of the Experts: How the Professionals and Specialists are Closing the Open Society. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN, Jethro K. (1978) Crisis at the Bar: Lawyers' Unethical Ethics (and What to Do About It). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
LIND, E. Allen and O'BARR, William M. (1979) “The Social Significance of Speech in the Courtroom,” in Giles, Howard and Clair, Robert St. (eds.) Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
LINTON, N.K. (1965) “The Witness and Cross-Examination,” 10 Berkeley Journal of Sociology 1.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl N. and E. Adamson, HOEBEL (1941) The Cheyenne Way. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. (1975) “Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report,” 7 Cognitive Psychology 560.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. (1977) “Reconstructive Memory Processes in Eyewitness Testimony,” in Sales, Bruce D. (ed.) Perspectives in Law and Psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. (1979) Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F., Diane, ALTMAN and Robert, GEBALLE (1975) “Effects of Questioning Upon a Witness's Later Recollections,” 3 Journal of Police Science and Administration 162.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth and John C., PALMER (1974) “Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory,” 11 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 585.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth and G., ZANNI (1975) “Eyewitness Testimony: The Influence of the Wording of a Question,” 5 Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 86.Google Scholar
LOPATA, Helena Z. (1976) “Expertization of Everyone and the Revolt of the Client,” 17 Sociological Quarterly 435.Google Scholar
LOWENTHAL, K. (1969) “Semantic Features and Communicability of Words of Different Classes,” 17 Psychonomic Science 79.Google Scholar
LOWN, Linda (1979) An Overview of the Plain English Movement. Jerusalem: Communications Institute, Hebrew University (Working Paper).Google Scholar
LYONS, John (ed.) (1970) New Horizons in Linguistics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
LYONS, John (1977) Semantics, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBARNET, Doreen (1977) “Victim in the Witness Box: Degradation Techniques,” 2 Victimology 72 (abstract).Google Scholar
McCAWLEY, J.D. (1970) “Where Do Noun Phrases Come From?” in Jacobs, Roderick and Rosenbaum, Peter (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar
McGUIRE, William J. (1973) “Persuasion, Resistance, and Attitude Change,” in Pool, Ithiel de Sola, Schramm, Wilbur, Frey, Frederick W., Maccoby, Nathan, and Parker, Edwin B. (eds.) Handbook of Communication. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
McKINLAY, John (1975) “Who Is Really Ignorant—Physician or Patient?” 16 Journal of Health and Social Behavior 3.Google Scholar
MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw (1934) “Introduction,“ in Hogbin, H., Law and Order in Polynesia. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
MARCKWORTH, M.L. and L.M., BELL (1967) “Sentence-Length Distribution in the Corpus,” in Kučera, H. and Francis, W.N. (eds.) Computational Analysis. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
MARKS, C.B., M.J., DOCTOROW and M.G., WITTROCK (1974) “Word Frequency and Reading Comprehension,” 67 Journal of Educational Research 259.Google Scholar
MASSERY, Louis N. II (ed.) (1978) Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy. Washington, D.C.: Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National College of Advocacy.Google Scholar
MELLINKOFF, David (1963) The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
MENCKEN, H.L. (1977) The American Language. New York: Knopf [first published in 1936].Google Scholar
MILESKI, Maureen (1971) “Courtroom Encounters: An Observation Study of a Lower Criminal Court,” 5 Law & Society Review 473.Google Scholar
MILLER, David G. and Elizabeth F., LOFTUS (1976) “Influencing Memory for People and Their Actions,” 71 Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9.Google Scholar
MILLER, N., G., MARUYIMA, R.J., BEAKER and K., VALONE (1976) “Speed of Speech and Persuasion,” 34 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 615.Google Scholar
MILLER, S. (1973) “Ends, Meanings and Galumphing: Some Leitmotifs of Play,” 75 American Anthropologist 87.Google Scholar
MILLS, C. Wright (1940) “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive,” 5 American Sociological Review 904.Google Scholar
MIRSKY, Jeannette (1937) “The Eskimo of Greenland,” in Mead, Margaret (ed.) Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive Peoples. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally F. and Barbara G., MEYERHOFF (eds.) (1977) Secular Ritual. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
MORRIS, Charles (1938) Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MORTON, Robert A. (1941) “Challenge Made to Beardsley's Plan for Plain and Simple Legal Syntax,” 16 California State Bar Journal 103.Google Scholar
MUELLER, Claus (1973) The Politics of Communication: A Study in the Political Sociology of Language, Socialization, and Legitimation. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
MUNCIO, Bernard (1915) “The Influence of the Form of a Question,” 8 British Journal of Psychology 351.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1967) “An Analysis of Zapotec Law Cases,” in Bohannan, Paul (ed.) Law and Warfare. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
NADER, Ralph and Mark, GREEN (eds.) (1976) Verdicts on Lawyers. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
NAYLOR, Paz Buenaventura (1979) “Linguistic and Cultural Interference in Legal Testimony.” Presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University of Bristol, July 16-20.Google Scholar
NEWMAN, Edwin (1974) Strictly Speaking: Will America Be the Death of English? Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
NONET, Philippe (1969) Administrative Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
NORDLUND, Gunvor (1978) “Do People Understand the Language of Judges?” Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (Swedish).Google Scholar
NORGATE, Kate (1891) “Henry II,” 9 Dictionary of National Biography 452.Google Scholar
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW (1974) “Developments in Law and Social Sciences Research.” 52(5) North Carolina Law Review.Google Scholar
O'BARR, William M. (1976) “Language and Politics in a Rural Tanzanian Council,” in O'Barr, William M. and O'Barr, Jean F. (eds.) Language and Politics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'BARR, William M. (1978) “Legal Assumptions About Language,” in Massery, Louis N. II (ed.) Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy. Washington, D.C.: Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National College of Advocacy.Google Scholar
O'BARR, William M. (n.d.) ”The Language of the Law—Vehicle or Obstacle?” in Heath, Shirley Brice and Ferguson, Charles (eds.) Language in the U.S.A. New York: Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
O'BARR, William M. and Bowman K., ATKINS (1978) “When Silence Is Golden—An Inquiry into the Nature and Meaning of Silence in an American Trial Courtroom,” Durham, N.C.: Duke University Law and Language Project (Research Report No. 18).Google Scholar
O'BARR, William and John, CONLEY (1976) “When a Juror Watches a Lawyer,” 3(3) Barrister 8.Google Scholar
O'GORMAN, Hubert (1963) Lawyers and Matrimonial Cases: A Study of Informal Pressures in Private Professional Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O'HAYRE, J. (1967) “Look at Gobbledygook,” 8 Law Office Economics and Management 97.Google Scholar
O'NEILL, B.J. (1972) “Definability as an Index of Word Meaning,” 1 Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 287.Google Scholar
ORTONY, Andrew (ed.) (1979) Metaphor and Thought. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ORWELL, George (1946) “Politics and the English Language,” in A Collection of Essays. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
PATVTO, A. and O'NEILL, B.J. (1970) “Visual Recognition Thresholds and Dimensions of Word Meaning,” 8 Perception and Psychophysics 273.Google Scholar
PARKINSON, Michael (1979) “Language Behavior and Courtroom Success.” Presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University of Bristol, July 16-20.Google Scholar
PEI, Mario (1973) Double-speak in America. New York: Hawthorn.Google Scholar
PERELMAN, Chaim (1963) The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
PHILIPS, Susan U. (1976) “Some Sources of Cultural Variability in the Regulation of Talk,” 5 Language in Society 81.Google Scholar
PHILIPS, Susan U. (1979) “Syntactic Variation in Judges' Use of Language in the Courtroom.” Presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University of Bristol, July 16-20.Google Scholar
PITKIN, Hanna Fenichel (1972) Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POSPISIL, Leopold (1958) Kapauku Papuans and Their Law. New Haven: Yale University Dept. of Anthropology (Publications in Anthropology No. 54).Google Scholar
POSPISIL, Leopold (1971) Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
POSTMAN, Neu, Charles, WEINGARTNER and Terence P., MORAN (eds.) (1969) Language in America: A Report on Our Deteriorating Semantic Environment. New York: Pegasus.Google Scholar
POUND, Roscoe (1906) “The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice,” 29 A.B.A. Reporter 395.Google Scholar
POWELL, T.G.E. (1958) The Celts. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
PRESSMAN, Rebecca (1979) Legislative and Regulatory Progress on the Readability of Insurance Policies. Washington, D.C.: Document Design Center.Google Scholar
PROBERT, W. (1959) “Law and Persuasion: The Language-Behavior of Lawyers.” 108 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 35.Google Scholar
PROBERT, W. (1972) Law, Language and Communication: Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
PROCACCIA, Uriel (1979) “Readable Insurance Policies: Judicial Regulation and Interpretation,” 14 Israel Law Review 74.Google Scholar
QUIRK, Randolph, Sidney, GREENBAUM, Geoffrey, LEECH and Jan, SVARTIK (1972) A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
QUIRK, Randolph and Sidney, GREENBAUM (1973) A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
RANK, Hugh (1974) Language and Public Policy. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
RAPPAPORT, Roy A. (1971) “Ritual, Sanctity and Cybernetics,” 73 American Anthropologist 59.Google Scholar
RASMUSSEN, Knud (1927) Across Arctic America. New York: G.P.Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
READ, J. Don, Roger H., BARNSLEY, Kim, ANKERS and Ian Q., WHISHAW (1978) “Variations in Severity of Verbs and Eyewitnesses' Testimony: An Alternative Interpretation,” 46 Perceptual and Motor Skills 795.Google Scholar
REDISH, Janice C. (1979) “Readability,“ in MacDonald (Chairman), D.A., Drafting Documents in Plain Language. New York: Practicing Law Institute.Google Scholar
REISMAN, Karl (1974) “Contrapuntal Conversations in an Antiguan Village,” in Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, Simon (1979) Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, Ian (1973) The Survival of English: Essays in Criticism of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
RODELL, Fred (1939) Woe Unto You, Lawyers! New York: Reynal and Hitchcock.Google Scholar
ROEH, Yizhak (1977) The Rhetoric of News. Ph.D. dissertation, Sociology, Columbia University.Google Scholar
ROGERS, A., R., WALL and J.P., MURPHY (eds.) (1977) Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implications. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Douglas E. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's In Charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
ROSSMAN, George (1962) “The Lawyers' English,” 48 American Bar Association Journal 50.Google Scholar
RUSSELL, Bertrand (1905) “On Denoting,” 14 Mind 479.Google Scholar
RUSSELL, Bertrand (1956) Logic and Knowledge (R.C. Marsh, ed.). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
SACKS, Harvey, Emanuel A., SCHEGLOFF and Gail, JEFFERSON (1974) “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking in Conversation,” 50 Language 696.Google Scholar
SALES, Bruce D., A., ELWORK and J., ALFINI (1977) “Improving Comprehension for Jury Instructions,” in Sales, B.D. (ed.) 1 Perspectives in Law and Psychology: The Criminal Justice System. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALMOND, Anne (1974) “Rituals of Encounter Among the Maori: Sociolinguistic Study of a Scene,” in Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SANTOS, SANTOS Boaventura de (1977) “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada,” 12 Law & Society Review 5.Google Scholar
SAUNDERS, William B. (19—) ”Pumps and Pauses: Strategic Use of Conversational Structure in Interrogations,“ in W.B. Saunders, —–.Google Scholar
SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de (1916) Cours de Linguistique Generale (5th ed.). Cours de Linguistique Generale (5th ed.): Payot [English translation, Wade Baskin, Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959].Google Scholar
SCHEFF, Thomas J. (1968) “Negotiating Reality: Notes on Power in the Assessment of Responsibility,” 16 Social Problems 1.Google Scholar
SCHEGLOFF, Emmanuel and Harvey, SACKS (1973) “Opening Up Closings,” 1 Semiotica 289.Google Scholar
SCHERER, Klaus (1979) “Voice and Speech Correlates of Perceived Social Influence in Simulated Juries,” in Giles, Howard and Clair, Robert St. (eds.) Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
SCHLESINGER, Arthur Jr. (1974) “Politics and the American Language,” 43 American Scholar 553.Google Scholar
SCHUTZ, Alfred (1962) 1 Collected Papers: The Problem of Social Reality (Maurice Natanson, ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
SCOTT, Marvin B. and Stanford M., LYMAN (1970) “Accounts,“ in Lyman, Stanford M. and Scott, Marvin B., The Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
SEARLE, John R. (1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEARLE, John R. (1976) “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts,” 5 Language in Society 1.Google Scholar
SEMEGEN, Patrick (1980) “Plain Language Legislation,” Case and Comment 42 (January-February).Google Scholar
SHUY, Roger W. (1978) “The Consumer and Insurance Policy Language.” Presented at the Conference on Consumers and Life Insurance—An Exchange of Views, Washington, D.C., May 15-16.Google Scholar
SHUY, Roger W. and Donald K., LARKIN (1978) “Linguistic Considerations in the Simplification/Clarification of Insurance Policy Language.” Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University and The Center for Applied Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHUY, Roger and Anna, SHNUKAL (1980) Language Use and the Uses of Language: Papers from the Fifth Annual Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
SLOBIN, Dan I. (1968) “Recall of Full and Truncated Passive Sentences in Connected Discourse,” 7 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 876.Google Scholar
SLOBIN, Dan I. (1971) Psycholinguistics. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
SPENCER, R.F. (1959) The North Alaskan Eskimo. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology (Bulletin 171).Google Scholar
SPIRO, R.J. (1975) “Inferential Reconstruction in Memory of Connected Discourse.” Champaign-Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois, Laboratory for Cognitive Studies in Education (Tech. Report No. 2).Google Scholar
STEINER, George (1968) “The Language Animal,” in Extra-Territorial: Papers on Literature and the Language Revolution. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
STEUER, Aron (1969) “Legal Vocabulary—Its Uses and Limitations,” 15 Practical Lawyer 39.Google Scholar
STRATHERN, Andrew (1975) “Veiled Speech in Mount Hagen,” in Bloch, Maurice (ed.) Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London: Academic.Google Scholar
SUE, W., R.E., SMITH and C., CALDWELL (1973) “Effects of Inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral Dilemma,” 3 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 345.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, R.S. (1974) “Evaluating and Improving Legal Processes—A Plea for Process Values,” 60 Cornell Law Review 1.Google Scholar
SWARTZ, Marc J. (1976) “Hyperbole, Politics, and Potent Specification: The Political Uses of a Figure of Speech,” in O'Barr, William M. and O'Barr, Jean F. (eds.) Language and Politics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
SWIFT, Jonathan (1947) Gullivers Travels. New York: Bonanza (Crown ed.) [first published 1727].Google Scholar
SYKES, Gresham M., and David, MATZA (1957) “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency,” 22 American Sociological Review 667.Google Scholar
SZASZ, Thomas (1979) The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric, and Repression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
TAMBIAH, S. J. (1968) “The Magical Power of Words,” 3 Man 171.Google Scholar
TAPP, June Louin and Felice J., LEVTNE (eds.) (1977) Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
THIBAUT, John and Laurens, WALKER (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
TIME (1978) “Those #X!!! Lawyers!” Time (April 10).Google Scholar
TISHER, Sharon, Lynn, BERNABEI and Mark, GREEN (1977) Bunging the Bar to Justice: A Comparative Study of Six Bar Assocations. Washington, D.C.: The Public Citizen.Google Scholar
TURNBULL, Cohn M. (1965) Wayward Servants. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
TURNER, Roy (ed.) (1974) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
TURNER, Victor (1977) “Variations on a Theme of Liminality,” in Moore, Sally F. and Meyerhoff, Barbara G. (eds.) Secular Ritual. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1973) 1970 Census of the Population, Special Report on National Origin and Language. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
VAN DEN STEENHOVEN, G. (1962) Leadership and Law Among the Eskimos of the Keewatin District, Northwest Territories. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Excelsior.Google Scholar
VAN DLJK, Teun A. (1977) Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
VAN GENNEP, Arnold (1960) Rites de Passage (trans. Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul [first published 1909].Google Scholar
VERIN, J. (1976) “Recherches sur les Problèmes de Communication dans la Justice,” 1 Revue de Science Criminelle et de Droit Pénal Comparé 190.Google Scholar
WAITZKIN, H. and J.D., STOECKLE (1972) “The Communication of Information About Illness,” 8 Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WANG, M.D. (1970) “The Role of Syntactic Complexity as a Determiner of Comprehensibility,” 9 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 398.Google Scholar
WARREN, W.L. (1973) Henry II. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WEARING, A.J. (1973) “The Recall of Sentences of Varying Length,” 25 Australian Journal of Psychology 155.Google Scholar
WEIHOFEN, H. (1964) “Word-Watching for Lawyers,” 50 American Bar Association Journal 663.Google Scholar
WEINREB, Lloyd L. (1977) Denial of Justice. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
WELCH, Julie (1979) “Clearly, Gobbledegook Must Go,” The National Observer (July 29).Google Scholar
WELLMAN, Francis L. (1903) The Art of Cross-Examination. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEYER, E.M. (1932) The Eskimos. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
WHITE, James B. (1972) The Legal Imagination. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
WIDDOWSON, H.G. (1973) “An Applied Linguistic Approach to Discourse Analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, George (1976) “The Opacity of Real Conspiracies.” Presented to the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February.Google Scholar
WINCH, Peter (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1961) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (trans, by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness). New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1964) Blue and Brown Books. New York and Evanston: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1968) Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed.) (trans, by G.E.M. Anscombe). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
WOLFF, Hans (1964) “Intelligibility and Inter-Ethnic Attitudes,” in Hymes, Dell (ed.) Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
WOOD, Richard E. (1978) “Twenty-one Recent Scandinavian Books on Language Policy,” 2 Language Problems and Language Planning 35.Google Scholar
WOOTTON, Anthony (1975) Dilemmas of Discourse: Controversies About the Sociological Interpretation of Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Patricia (1978) “Feeding the Information Eaters: Suggestions for Integrating Pure and Applied Research on Language Comprehension,” 7 Instructional Science 249.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Patricia (1979) “Helping Lawyers Communicate,” Legal Action Group Bulletin (July).Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael (1978) Legal Services for the Community. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar