Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T09:55:47.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is It the What or the How? The Roles of High-Policing Tactics and Procedural Justice in Predicting Perceptions of Hostile Treatment: The Case of Security Checks at Ben-Gurion Airport, Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tal Jonathan-Zamir ,
Badi Hasisi  and
Yoram Margalioth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What affects perceptions of hostile treatment by police, characterized by feelings such as humiliation and intimidation? Is it what the police do to the citizen, or is it about how they do it? The important effects of procedural justice are well documented in the policing literature. Yet, it is not clear how high-policing tactics, coupled with procedural justice, affect one's sense of hostile treatment: is it the case that what the police do does not matter as long as they follow the principles of procedural justice, or do some invasive or unpleasant tactics produce negative emotions regardless of the amount of procedural justice displayed by the officer? In the present study we examine this question in the context of security checks at Ben-Gurion Airport, Israel. Using a survey of 1,970 passengers, we find that the behavioral elements of procedural justice are an important antidote, mitigating the negative effects of four “extra” screening measures on the perceived hostility of the checks. At the same time, two security measures retain an independent and significant effect. We discuss the implications of our findings and hypothesize about the characteristics of policing practices that are less sensitive to procedural justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 608 - 636
Copyright
© 2016 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Amir, Menachem & Einstein, Stanley, eds. (2001) Policing, Security and Democracy: Theory and Practice. Huntsville: Office of International Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Bayley, David & Weisburd, David (2009) “Cops and Spooks: The Role of the Police in Counterterrorism,” in Weisburd, D., et al., eds., To Protect and to Serve: Policing in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Blader, Steven & Tyler, Tom R. (2003a) “A Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process,” 29 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 747–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blader, Steven & Tyler, Tom R. (2003b) “What Constituted Fairness in Work Settings? A Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice,” 13 Human Resource Management Rev. 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Ben, et al. (2014) “Officers as Mirrors: Policing, Procedural Justice and the (Re)Production of Social Identity,” 54 British J. of Criminology 527–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, Anthony, et al. (2014) “The Salience of Social Contextual Factors in Appraisals of Police Interactions with Citizens: A Randomized Factorial Experiment,” 30 J. of Quantitative Criminology 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, Joel, et al. (2001) “Culture and Procedural Justice: The Influence of Power Distance on Reactions to Voice,” 37 J. of Experimental Social Psychology 300–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, Jean-Paul (1983) “High and Low Policing: Remarks about the Policing of Political Activities,” 30 Social Problems 5, 507–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, Jean-Paul (2010). The Policing Web. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, Jean-Paul & Depeyron, Nicolas (2003) “Democracy and Secrecy: The French Intelligence Community.” In Brodeur, J.-P., Gill, P., & Tollborg, D., eds., Democracy, Law and Security. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) Israel (2015) Movement of Aircraft, Freight and Passengers, Revenue and Labor Input in Airport Services. [In Hebrew]. Available at: http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton66/st24_08.pdf (accessed 27 October 2015).Google Scholar
Duek, Amalia (2013) “Automated Luggage Screening: An End to the Question ‘Did You Pack Alone?’,” Channel 2 News. [In Hebrew]. Available at: http://www.mako.co.il/news-israel/local/Article-3d0c32ebd121f31004.htm (accessed 2 February 2016).Google Scholar
Elliot, Irina, et al. (2011) “Procedural Justice in Contacts with the Police: Testing a Relational Model of Authority in a Mixed Methods Study,” 17 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 592–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R., et al. (2014) Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Factor, Roni, et al. (2014) “Procedural Justice, Minorities, and Religiosity,” 15 Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 2, 130–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, Jacinta M. (2011) “The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical Test of Core Theoretical Propositions,” 39 J. of Criminal Justice 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, Jacinta M. (2013) “Consent Searches as a Threat to Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Analysis of Consent Requests During Traffic Stops,” 24 Criminal Justice Policy Rev. 759–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, Jacinta & Brunson, Rod K. (2010) “Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner-City Young Men's Perceptions of Police Legitimacy,” 27 Justice Q. 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, Jacinta, et al. (2012) “Examining Macro-Level Impacts on Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy,” 40 J. of Criminal Justice 333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasisi, Badi & Weisburd, David (2011) “Going Beyond Ascribed Identities: The Importance of Procedural Justice in Airport Security Screening in Israel,” 45 Law & Society Rev. 867–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasisi, Badi, et al. (2012) “Ethnic Profiling in Airport Screening: Lessons from Israel, 1968-2010,” 14 American Law and Economics Rev. 517–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, Lyn & Murphy, Kristina (2007) “Public Satisfaction with Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy,” 40 Australian and New Zealand J. of Criminology 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huq, Aziz Z., et al. (2011) “Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom,” 8 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 728–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAA (Israel Airport Authorities) (2015) Statistics. Available at: http://www.iaa.gov.il/en-us/airports/bengurion/pages/statistics.aspx (accessed 29 October 2015).Google Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan, et al. (2012) “Why Do People Comply with the Law?: Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions,” 52 British Journal of Criminology 1051–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan et al. (2013) “Monopolizing Force?: Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence,” 19 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 479–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, Tal & Weisburd, David (2013) “The Effects of Security Threats on Antecedents of Police Legitimacy: Findings from a Quasi-Experiment in Israel,” 50 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, Tal, et al. (2014) Policing Terrorism, Crime Control and Police-Community Relations: Learning from the Israeli Experience. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, Tal, et al. (2015) “Measuring Procedural Justice in Police-Citizen Encounters,” 32 Justice Q. 845–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochel, Tammy, et al. (2013) “Examining Police Effectiveness as a Precursor to Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police,” 30 Justice Q. 895–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. Allen & Tyler, Tom R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. Allen, et al. (1997) “Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments,” 73 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 767–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, Cynthia & Nagin, Daniel S. (in press) “Reinventing American Policing: A Seven-Point Blueprint for the 21st Century,” in Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research.Google Scholar
Lum, Cynthia, et al. (2015) “Discretion and Fairness in Airport Security Screening,” 28 Security J. 352–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Edward & Johnson, Devon (2010) “Measuring Public Perceptions of the Police,” 33 Policing: An International J. of Police Strategies & Management 703–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, Stephen, et al. (1996) “Compliance on Demand: The Public's Response to Specific Police Requests,” 33 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine, et al. (2013) “Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice,” 51 Criminology 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, John D. (2003) Police Requests for Compliance: Coercive and Procedurally Just Tactics. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
Meares, Tracy L. (2014) “The Law and Social Science of Stop and Frisk,” 10 Annual Rev. of Law and Social Science 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kristina (2014) “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Policing,” in Bruinsma, G., & Weisburd, D., eds., Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kristina, et al. (2008) “Encouraging Public Cooperation and Support for Police,” 18 Policing and Society 136–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (2004) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence, in Skogan, W., and Frydl, K., eds. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Robert M. (2007) “A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors,” 41 Quality & Quantity 673–90.Google Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond, et al. (1997) “Do Fair Procedures Matter? The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault,” 31 Law and Society Rev. 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Simon & Jonathan-Zamir, Tal (2014) “Lessons from Empirical Research on Policing in Israel: Policing Terrorism and Police-Community Relationships,” 15 Police Practice and Research: An International J. 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015) Final Report on the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Reisig, Michael, et al. (2007) “The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures,” 34 Criminal Justice and Behavior 1005–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias & Zeckhauser, Richard (2004) “Racial Profiling,” 32 Philosophy and Public Affairs 131–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, Raf (2015). “Video Shows Police Killing Black Nan in New Jersey,” The Telegraph. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11361504/Video-shows-police-killing-black-man-in-New-Jersey.html (accessed 27 October 2015).Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen, et al. (2011) “American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and the Procedural Justice Alternative,” 101 The J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 335–74.Google Scholar
Sindhav, Birud, et al. (2006) “The Impact of Perceived Fairness on Satisfaction: Are Airport Security Measures Fair? Does It Matter?,” 14 J. of Marketing Theory and Practice 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunshine, Jason & Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 513–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri & Turner, John (1979) “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict,” in Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S., eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri & Turner, John (1986) “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Worchel, S., & Austin, W. G., eds., Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Tankebe, Justice (2009a) “Policing, Procedural Fairness and Public Behavior: A Review and Critique,” 11 International J. of Police Science and Management 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankebe, Justice (2009b) “Public Cooperation with the Police in Ghana: Does Procedural Fairness Matter?,” 47 Criminology 1265–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankebe, Justice (2013) “Viewing Things Differently: The Dimensions of Public Perceptions of Police Legitimacy,” 51 Criminology 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, John & Walker, Laurens (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1988) “What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 103–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1994) “Governing Amid Diversity: Can Fair Decision-Making Procedures Bridge Competing Public Interests and Values?,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 701–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2001) “Public Trust and Confidence in Legal Authorities: What Do Majority and Minority Group Members Want from Legal Authorities?,” 19 Behavioral Sciences and The Law 215–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law,” 30 Crime and Justice 283–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2004) “Enhancing Police Legitimacy,” 593 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006) Why People Obey to the Law. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2009) “Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation,” 7 Ohio State J. of Criminal Law 307–59.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2011) Why People Cooperate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. & Blader, Steven L. (2013) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. & Fagan, Jeffery (2008) “Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why do People Help the Police Fight Crime in their Communities?,” 6 Ohio State J. of Criminal Law 231–75.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. & Huo, Yuen J. (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation With the Police and Courts. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. & Lind, E. Allan (1992) “A Relational Model of Authority in Groups,” 25 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 115–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. & Wakslak, Cheryl J. (2004) “Profiling and Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Attributions of Motive and Acceptance of Police Authority,” 18 Criminology 267–74.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., et al. (1996) “Understanding Why the Justice of Group Procedures Matters,” 70 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 913–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., et al. (2007) “Reiterative Shaming, Procedural Justice, and Recidivism: The Engagement of Offenders Psychological Mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-Driving Experiment,” 41 Law & Society Rev. 553–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., et al. (2010) “Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans,” 44 Law & Society Rev. 365–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., et al. (2014a) “Street Stops and Police Legitimacy: Teachable Moments in Young Urban Men's Legal Socialization,” 11 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 751–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., et al. (2014b) “Procedural Justice and Cooperation,” in Bruinsma, G., & Weisburd, D., eds., Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, et al. (2009) “The Israeli Model for Policing Terrorism: Goals, Strategies and Open Questions,” 36 Criminal Justice and Behavior 1259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

HCJ 4797/07 The Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. Israeli Aviation Authority (March 10, 2015) (in Hebrew). Available at: http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/07/970/047/s45/07047970.s45.htm.Google Scholar
The appeal is available (in Hebrew) at: http://www.acri.org.il/pdf/petitions/hit4797.pdf.Google Scholar