Article contents
The Influence of Presidential Versus Home State Senatorial Preferences on the Policy Output of Judges on the United States District Courts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
Abstract
While many of the decisions of federal district court judges involve the routine application of settled legal rules, a significant minority of their decisions present the judges with the opportunity to engage in judicial policy making. A considerable body of literature suggests that when faced with policy-making opportunities, the policy preferences of the judges exert a significant impact on the nature of those decisions. The present study explores the question of whose preferences are manifested in the policy-relevant decisions of the district court judges. In particular, we seek to determine the relative impact of the preferences of the major elites involved in the selection of federal district judges: the appointing president, home state senators of the president's party, and home state elites outside the Senate who are consulted when a president makes an appointment from a state whose Senate delegation is in the hands of the opposition party.
The analysis is based on all published decisions of the district courts in civil liberties, economic and labor, and criminal procedure cases decided between 1961 and 1995. We find that contrary to the expectations derived from the existing literature on district judge appointments, the political preferences of the appointing presidents are most closely related to the policy relevant decisions of the judges.
- Type
- Papers of General Interest
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2002 Law and Society Association.
Footnotes
The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert A. Carp and Dr. Ronald Stidham for graciously sharing their data with us.
References
- 12
- Cited by