Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:08:19.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Presidential Versus Home State Senatorial Preferences on the Policy Output of Judges on the United States District Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While many of the decisions of federal district court judges involve the routine application of settled legal rules, a significant minority of their decisions present the judges with the opportunity to engage in judicial policy making. A considerable body of literature suggests that when faced with policy-making opportunities, the policy preferences of the judges exert a significant impact on the nature of those decisions. The present study explores the question of whose preferences are manifested in the policy-relevant decisions of the district court judges. In particular, we seek to determine the relative impact of the preferences of the major elites involved in the selection of federal district judges: the appointing president, home state senators of the president's party, and home state elites outside the Senate who are consulted when a president makes an appointment from a state whose Senate delegation is in the hands of the opposition party.

The analysis is based on all published decisions of the district courts in civil liberties, economic and labor, and criminal procedure cases decided between 1961 and 1995. We find that contrary to the expectations derived from the existing literature on district judge appointments, the political preferences of the appointing presidents are most closely related to the policy relevant decisions of the judges.

Type
Papers of General Interest
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert A. Carp and Dr. Ronald Stidham for graciously sharing their data with us.

References

Alumbaugh, Steve, & Rowland, C. K. (1990) “The Links Between Platform-Based Appointment Criteria and Trial Judges' Abortion Judgments,” 74 Judicature 153–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., & Hanson, Russell L. (1998) “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93,” 42 American J. of Political Science 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carp, Robert A., & Rowland, C. K. (1983) Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Carp, Robert A., & Stidham, Ronald (1998) The Federal Courts, 3rd Ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Harold W. (1966) “Federal Judges: The Appointing Process,” 51 Minnesota Law Review 185.Google Scholar
Fowler, Gary W. (1983) “A Comparison of Initial Recommendation Procedures: Judicial Selection Under Reagan and Carter.” 1 Yale Law & Policy Review 299356.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael W., & Walker, Thomas (1975) “Judicial Policy Making and Southern School Segregation,” 37 Journal of Politics 917–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Michael W., Hettinger, Virginia A., & Peppers, Todd (2001) “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas,” 54 Political Research Quarterly 623–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1997) Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt Through Reagan. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goulden, Joseph C. (1974). The Benchwarmers: The Private World of the Powerful Federal Judges. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel B. (1965) Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Harris, Joseph P. (1953) The Advice and Consent of the Senate. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Evans (1944) Selection and Tenure of Judges. Newark: National Conference of Judicial Councils.Google Scholar
McFeeley, Neil D. (1987). Appointment of Judges: The Johnson Presidency. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Peltason, Jack W. (1955) Federal Courts in the Political Process. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., & Rosenthal, Howard (1997) Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Richard J., and Vines, Kenneth N. (1970) The Politics of Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. K., & Carp, Robert A. (1983) “Presidential Effects on Federal District Court Policy Decisions: Economic Liberalism, 1960–77,” 64 Social Science Quarterly 386–92.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. K., & Carp, Robert A. (1996) Politics and Judgment in the Federal District Courts. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Howard, Robert, & Hutz, Christopher (1996) “Presidential Success in Supreme Court Nominations: Testing a Constrained Presidency Model.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot (1984) “Judicial Selection Systems and Nomination Outcomes: Does the Process Make a Difference?” 12 American Politics Quarterly 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R., & Humphries, Martha Anne (2000) “Assessing the Impact of Presidential and Home State Influences on Judicial Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: New Evidence from Refined Measurements.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stidham, Ronald, & Carp, Robert A. (1987) “Judges, Presidents and Policy Choices: Exploring the Linkage,” 68 Social Sciences Quarterly 395404.Google Scholar
Stidham, Ronald, Carp, Robert A., & Rowland, C. K. (1984) “Patterns of Presidential Influence on the Federal District Courts: An Analysis of the Appointment Process,” 14 Presidential Studies Quarterly 548–60.Google Scholar
Stidham, Ronald, Carp, Robert A., & Songer, Donald R. (1996) “The Voting Behavior of President Clinton's Judicial Appointees,” 80 Judicature 1620.Google Scholar
Tate, Neal C., & Handberg, Roger (1991) “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916–88,” 35 American J. of Political Science 460–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, Kenneth (1964) “Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South,” 26 J. of Politics 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenner, Lettie M., & Dutter, Lee E. (1988) “Contextual Influences on Judicial Decision Making,” 41 Western Political Quarterly 115–34.Google Scholar