Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:05:59.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of a Legal Revolution in Rural Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

June Starr
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Jonathan Pool
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines the impact of Turkey's radical introduction of Western law codes and secular courts by analyzing a portion (1950-67) of the docket of a rural district court, located in Bodrum, Turkey. We are particularly interested in whether a transplanted formal legal system can influence the countryside, and we ask: (1) To what extent are rural district law courts being used, and is this use increasing? (2) In what domains are rural courts used, and to what degree do these coincide with domains formerly covered by religious and/or customary law? (3) How is the use of the courts distributed between settling disputes (including disputes between the state and citizens) and processing routine, undisputed formalities, and is this distribution changing? (4) To what extent are women and other non-powerful groups (rural, poor, ethnic minorities) using the courts, and has this use changed over time? (5) To what extent is the government using the courts for social control purposes, and how does this use compare with non-governmental use of the courts? (6) How does the use of the courts relate to abrupt shifts in political power and ideology?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1974.

Footnotes

AUTHORS' NOTE: We are indebted to John Whiting and Bea Whiting for advice on coding, Michael Rowe for coding, NIMH for suporting through a predoctoral fellowship and grant, Starr's 16 months' fieldwork in Bodrum, Turkey (1967-68), and SUNY Research Foundation for Pool's 1972 and Starr's 1973 summer Faculty Research Fellowships. In addition, we are grateful to Marc Galanter, Laura Nader, Samuel Popkin, and Richard L. Abel for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper delivered at the 1972 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1970) “Case Method Research in the Customary Laws of Wrongs in Kenya,” Yale Law School Studies in Law and Modernization (2), Part II.Google Scholar
AKTAN, Resat (1966) “Problems of Land Reform in Turkey,” 20 Middle East Journal 317.Google Scholar
BALTA, T. B. (1957) “Turkish Administrative Law and Institutions,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 34.Google Scholar
BELGESAY, M. R. (1957) “Social, Economic and Technical Difficulties Experienced as a Result of the Reception of Foreign Law,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 49.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1971) “The Social Organization of Arrest,” 23 Stanford Law Review 1087.Google Scholar
CLEBERT, J. (1967) The Gypsies. The Gypsies: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
DAVISON, Roderic H. (1968) Turkey. Turkey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
ELEFTEROPULOS, E. K. (1963) “Le divorce en droit civil turc.” These de droit inédite, Lyon.Google Scholar
FAHRI, Ziyaeddin (1936) Essai sur la transformation de Code Familial en Turquie. Essai sur la transformation de Code Familial en Turquie: Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, W. L. F. (1971) “Forms and Social Settings of Dispute Settlement,” Yale Law School, Program in Law and Modernization, Working Paper No. 3.Google Scholar
FEROZE, Muhammad Rashid (1962) “Family Laws of the Turkish Republic,” 1 Islamic Studies 131.Google Scholar
FINDIKOGLU, L. F. (1935) Essai sur la transformation du Code Familial en Turquie. Essai sur la transformation du Code Familial en Turquie: Imprimerie Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
FREY, Frederick W. (1965) The Turkish Political Elite. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1972) “The Aborted Restoration of Indigenous' Law in India,” 14 Comparative Studies in Society and History 53.Google Scholar
GIBB, H. A. R., and Harold, BOWEN (1950) Islamic Society and the West. Part 1, Islamic Society in the Eighteenth Century. 2 vols. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
GOKTURK, Hüseyin Avni (1939) “La Famille en la Turquie,” in H., LEVY-ULLMANN and B., MIRKINE-GUETZEVITCH (eds.) La vie juridique des peuples. Vol. vii. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
GRACE, Roger (1970) “Justice, Chinese Style,” 75 Case and Comment 50.Google Scholar
HALL, Jerome (1952) Theft, Law and Society. Theft, Law and Society: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
JASCHKE, Gotthard (1953) “Zur Form der Eheschliessung in der Türkei,” 2 (N.S.) Die Welt des Islams 143.Google Scholar
KAWASHIMA, Takeyoshi (1964) “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan,” in A. VON, MEHREN (ed.) Law in Japan: The Legal Order of a Changing Society. Tokyo: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
KUBALI, H. N. (1957) “Modernization and Secularization as Determining Factors in Reception in Turkey,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 21.Google Scholar
LEWIS, Bernard (1961) The Emergence of Modern Turkey. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LEWIS, Bernard (1960) The Arabs in History. 2nd Edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, S. (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MARDIN, Serif Arif (1961) “Some Explanatory Notes on the Origins of the ‘Mecelle,‘” 51 Muslim World 189, 274.Google Scholar
MASSELL, Gregory J. (in press) The Strategy of Social Change and the Role of Women in Soviet Central Asia: A Case-Study in Modernization and Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MASSELL, Gregory J. (1968) “Law as an Instrument of Revolutionary Change in a Traditional Milieu: The Case of Soviet Central Asia,” 2 Law & Society Review 179.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1965) “Choices in Legal Procedure: Shia Moslem and Mexican Zapotec,” 67 American Anthropologist 394.Google Scholar
ONAR, S. S. (1955) “The Majalla,” in M., KADDURI and H. J., LIEBESNY (eds.) Law in the Middle East, Vol. I. Origin and Development of Islamic Law. Washington: The Middle East Institute.Google Scholar
PAYASLIOGLU, Arif T. (1964) “Political Leadership and Political Parties: Turkey,” in Robert E., WARD and Dankwart A., RUSTOW (eds.) Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
PRUCHA, Francis Paul (1962) American Indian Policy in the Formative Years: The Indian Trade and Intercourse Acts, 1790-1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
PYE, Lucian W. (1963) “The Non-Western Political Process,” in Harry, ECKSTEIN and David, APTER (eds.) Comparative Politics. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
SCHACHT, J. (1970) “Law and Justice,” in Peter Malcolm, HOLT, Ann K. S., LAMBTON, and Bernard, LEWIS (eds.) The Cambridge History of Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
STARR, June (n.d.) “Turkish Village Disputing,” in M. J., LOWY (ed.) Choice-making in the Law.Google Scholar
STARR, June (1970) Mandalinci Koy: Law and Social Control in a Turkish Village. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
STIRLING, Paul (1957) “Land, Marriage, and the Law in Turkish Villages,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 21.Google Scholar
STONE, Julius (1966) Social Dimensions of Law and Justice. Social Dimensions of Law and Justice: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
TIMUR, H. (1957) “Civil Marriage in Turkey: Difficulties, Causes and Remedies,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 34.Google Scholar
TURKEY, Basbakanlik. Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü (1967) Miili Egitim Hareketleri 1927-1966. Miili Egitim Hareketleri 1927-1966: Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü Matbaasi.Google Scholar
TURKEY (1948) “Koy Kanunu,” in TURKEY, Düstur 1924-1925. Vol. v. Ankara: Basbakanlik Devlet Matbaasi.Google Scholar
ULKEN, H. Z. (1957) “The New Civil Code and the Traditional Customary Law,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 51.Google Scholar
VELIDEDEOGLU, H. V. (1957) “The Reception of the Swiss Civil Code in Turkey,” 9 International Social Science Bulletin 60.Google Scholar
WARD, Robert E., and Dankwart A., RUSTOW, eds. (1964) Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar