Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:24:48.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Functions of Courts in the United States, 1950-1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

James Willard Hurst
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite increased research into court operations, reliable knowledge about court functions continues to be scant. Case volume has grown, but court dispositions account for a small part of all dispute resolutions. Most matters which reach disposition in court end at some stage of trial court proceedings. Judges also continue to be makers of general public policy. Common law growth has dwindled. But courts contribute much to the content of public policy through their interpretation of statutes and their review of executive and administrative action. Judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation has declined sharply in fields centered on the economy, while expanding in areas of civil liberties.

Type
Part One-Background: The Need for Research on Civil Courts
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 15 , Issue 3-4: Special Issue on Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation , 1981 , pp. 401 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

This paper was originally prepared for the Council on the Role of Courts.

References

Cases Cited

Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 1971.Google Scholar
Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax Commission, 429 U.S. 318, 1977.Google Scholar
Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 1970.Google Scholar
Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison, 340 U.S. 349, 1951.Google Scholar
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 1951.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 1972.Google Scholar
Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474, 1959.Google Scholar
Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 1956.Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 1965.Google Scholar
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Ingram, 290 N.C. 457, 226 S.E.2d 498, 1976.Google Scholar
Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 1962.Google Scholar
Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 1958.Google Scholar
Kleppe v. New Mexico, 426 U.S. 529, 1976.Google Scholar
Larson v. Lesser, 106 So. 2d 188, Fla. 1958.Google Scholar
Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. Kuhn, 270 Md. 496, 312 A.2d 216, 1973.Google Scholar
McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184, 1964.Google Scholar
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 1973.Google Scholar
National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833, 1976.Google Scholar
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 1964.Google Scholar
Ortwein v. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656, 1973.Google Scholar
Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U.S. 176, 185, 1935.Google Scholar
People ex rel. Orcutt v. Instantwhip Denver, Inc., 176 Colo. 396, 490 P.2d 941, 1971.Google Scholar
Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 331 U.S. 549, 571, 1947.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 1973.Google Scholar
Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600, 1974.Google Scholar
S. Bloom, Inc. v. Makin, 61 Ill. 2d 70, 329 N.E.2d 213, 1975.Google Scholar
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 1973.Google Scholar
Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205, 221, 1917.Google Scholar
Town of Caledonia v. Racine Limestone Co., Inc., 266 Wis. 475, 63 N.W.2d 697, 1954.Google Scholar
United States v. Kras., 409 U.S. 434, 1973.Google Scholar
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252, 1977.Google Scholar
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1, 1974.Google Scholar
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 1976.Google Scholar
Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 1977.Google Scholar