Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T03:07:21.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Christopher Tomlins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I address the historical interrelationship of law and social science. I explore the separation of “law” and “social science” during the later 19th century, examine their relationship over the next 50 years, and finally take up their more elaborate post-World War II interaction, culminating in the birth and development of the law and society movement. The narrative focuses on two realms of encounter, the intellectual and the institutional, or “spatial,” and in the latter case on two particular locales—the academy and the state. Histories of the interaction of law and social science have mostly pursued its academic aspect, resulting in a history of encounters expressed primarily as pedagogical disputes. But encounters between law and the social science disciplines are also competitions between distinct languages of state formation. Moments of encounter are moments of rivalry in the state, not simply in the common room. Mostly, I conclude, law wins.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , 2000 , pp. 911 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was first conceived as an element of the American Bar Foundation project “Law's Disciplinary Encounters.” I am grateful to the editors of that project—Bryant G. Garth, Robert L. Nelson, and Victoria Saker Woeste—for their willingness to see it published here. Earlier drafts have been presented for discussion at the American Bar Foundation Conference on Law's Disciplinary Encounters (Chicago 1999), at the Association Canadienne Droit et Societé/Canadian Law and Society Association Annual Meeting (Lake Louise, Alberta 2000), and at faculty workshops at Georgetown University Law Center (1999), the University of Pennsylvania Law School (1999), the Johns Hopkins University History Department (2000), the Green College Law and Society Seminar, University of British Columbia (2000), Tel Aviv University Law Faculty (2000), and Hebrew University, Jerusalem Law Faculty/American Studies Department (2000). I am very grateful to all who took part in these discussions. I owe particular thanks for their comments to Daniel R. Ernst, Carrie Menkel-Meadow, William J. Novak, Dorothy Ross, and the Law and Society Review's referees.

References

References

Arnold, Thurman W. (1937) “The Jurisprudence of Edward S. Robinson,” 46 Yak Law J. 1282–89.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. (1976) Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Babcock, Barbara Allen (1998) “Feminist Lawyers,” 50 Stanford Law Rev. 1689–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardaglio, Peter W. (1995) Reconstructing the Household: Families, Sex and the Law in the Nineteenth Century South. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bender, Thomas (1993) Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bergin, Thomas (1968) “The Law Teacher: A Man Divided against Himself,” 54 Virginia Law Rev. 637–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel ([1941] 1973) The Mysterious Science of the Law: An Essay on Blackstone's Commentaries Showing How Blackstone, Employing Eighteenth-Century Ideas of Science, Religion, History, Aesthetics, and Philosophy, Made of the Law at once a Conservative and a Mysterious Science. Reprint. Gloucester, MA: P. Smith.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” 38 Hastings Law J. 814–53.Google Scholar
Brigham, John (1998) “The Constitution of Interests: Institutionalism, CLS, and New Approaches to Sociolegal Studies,” 10 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 421–61.Google Scholar
Brigham, John, & Harrington, Christine (1989) “Realism and Its Consequences: An Inquiry into Contemporary Sociological Research,” 17 International J. of the Sociology of Law 41–62.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. (1984) “Of Law and the River,” 34 J. of Legal Education 222–28.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. (1995) “Hail! Langdell!” 20 Law & Social Inquiry 691–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Paul (1988) The Road to Botany Bay: An Essay in Spatial History. Boston: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Chapman, Richard N. (1981) Contours of Public Policy, 1939–1945. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Clark, Blue (1994) Lone Wolf v. Lone Wolf v: Treaty Rights and Indian Law at the End of the Nineteenth Century. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. (1993) “Law and Economics at Chicago,” 36 J. of Law & Economics 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, George H. (1968) American Science in the Age of Jackson. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Demos, John (1981) “History and the Formation of Social Policy Toward Children: A Case Study,” in Rothman, D.J. & Wheeler, S., eds., Social History and Social Policy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drachman, Virginia (1998) Sisters in Law: Women Lawyers in Modern American History. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil (1995) Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. (1992) “The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession,” 91 Michigan Law Rev. 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, Frank L. (1977) Law on the Midway: The Founding of the University of Chicago Law School. Chicago: Law School of the Univ. of Chicago, distributed by the Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs (1993) Women in Law. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. (1993) “Common Laborers? Industrial Pluralists, Legal Realists, and the Law of Industrial Disputes, 1915–1943,” 11 Law & History Rev. 59–100.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. (1998) “Law and American Political Development, 1877–1938,” 26 Reviews in American History 205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R. (2000) “Willard Hurst and the Administrative State: From Williams to Wisconsin,” 18 Law & History Rev. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. (1997) “Willard Hurst, Master of the Legal Process,”1997 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1181–89.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Robert A. (1984) Law and Letters in American Culture. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Field, David Dudley ([1859] 1884) “Magnitude and Importance of Legal Science,” in Sprague, A. P., ed., Speeches, Arguments, and Miscellaneous Papers of David Dudley Field. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha (1991) Introduction to M. Fineman & N. S. Thomadsen, eds., At the Boundaries of Law: Feminism and Legal Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Ellen (1990) Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, Ernst (1904) The Police Power: Public Policy and Constitutional Rights. Chicago: Callaghan.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1973) History of American Law. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, Mary O. (1975) Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905. Lexington: Univ. Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O. (1993) “The Republican Tradition and the New Liberalism: Social Investigation, State Building, and Social Learning in the Gilded Age,” in Lacey, M.J. & Furner, M. O., eds., The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, & Edwards, Mark Alan (1997) “The Path of the Law Ands,” 1997 Wisconsin Law Rev. 375–87.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant G. (1990) “Strategic Research in Law and Society,” 18 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 57–68.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant G. (2000) “James Willard Hurst as Entrepreneur for the Field of Law and Social Science,” 18 Law & History Rev. 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, Bryant, & Sterling, Joyce (1998) “From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 409–71.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Grant (1974) The Death of Contract. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1983) “Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870–1920,” in Geison, G. L., ed., Professions and Professional Ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1984) “Critical Legal Histories,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1985) “‘Of Law and the River,‘ and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom,” 35 J. of Legal Education 1–16.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1995) “The Case For (and Against) Harvard,” 93 Michigan Law Rev. 1231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1996) “The Past as Authority and as Social Critic: Stabilizing and Destabilizing Functions of History in Legal Argument,” in McDonald, T. J., ed., The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1997) Foreword: “The Arrival of Critical Historicism,” 49 Stanford Law Rev. 1023–29.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. (1989) The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hammack, David C., & Wheeler, Stanton (1994) Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907–1972. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M., & Sacks, Albert M. (1994) The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Westbury, N.Y.: Foundation Press (prepared for publication from the 1958 Tentative Edition by William N. Eskridge and Philip P. Frickey.).Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (1994) “Snakes in Ireland: A Conversation with Willard Hurst,” 12 Law & History Rev. 370–90.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas (1977) The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, David (1836) A Course of Legal Study, Addressed to Students and the Profession Generally. 2 vols. Baltimore: J. Neal.Google Scholar
Hull, Natalie (1997) Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American Jurisprudence. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. Willard (1956) Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Irons, Peter H. (1982) The New Deal Lawyers. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1986) Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1996) The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kandel, Randy Frances (1993) “Whither the Legal Whale: Interdisciplinarity and the Socialization of Professional Identity,” 27 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Rev. 9–24.Google Scholar
Kimball, Bruce (1999) ‘“Warn Students That I Entertain Heretical Opinions, Which They Are Not To Take as Law’: The Inception of Case Method Teaching in the Classrooms of the Early C. C. Langdell, 1870–1883,” 17 Law & History Rev. 57–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W., ed. (1983) “The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932–1970,” 26 J. of Law & Economics 163–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konefsky, Alfred S. (1988) “Law and Culture in Antebellum Boston,” 40 Stanford Law Rev. 1119–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornbluh, Felicia (1996) “The New Literature on Gender and the Welfare State: The U.S. Case,” 22 Feminist Studies 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korver, Ton (1990) The Fictitious Commodity: A Study of the U.S. Labor Market, 1880–1940. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kraines, Oscar (1974) The World and Ideas of Ernst Freund: The Search for General Principles of Legislation and Administrative Law. University, AL: Univ. of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, Michael J. (1993) “The World of the Bureaus: Government and the Positivist Project in the Late Nineteenth Century,” in Lacey, M. J. & Furner, M. O., eds., The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
LaPiana, William P. (1994) Logic and Experience: The Origin of Modern American Legal Education. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPiana, William P. (1999) “Langdell Laughs,” 17 Law & History Rev. 141–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Felice J. (1990) “‘His’ and ‘Her’ Story: The Life and Future of the Law and Society Movement,” 18 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 69–90.Google Scholar
Lipschultz, Sybil (1991) “Social Feminism and Legal Discourse,” in M. A. Fineman & N. S. Thomadsen, At the Boundaries of Law: Feminism and Legal Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipson, Leon, & Wheeler, Stanton (1986) Introduction to L. Lipson & S. Wheeler, eds., Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Malouf, David (1996) The Conversations at Curlow Creek. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles W. (1998) “The ‘Liberty of Contract’ Regime in American Law,” in Scheiber, H. N., ed., The State and Freedom of Contract. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McEvoy, Arthur F. (1997) “Willard Hurst's Scholarship: Pragmatism and Morality,” 1997 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1191–1203.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1989) “Exploring a Research Agenda of the Feminization of the Legal Profession: Theories of Gender and Social Change,” 14 Law & Social Inquiry 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1990) “Durkheimian Epiphanies: The Importance of Engaged Social Science in Legal Studies,” 18 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 91–119.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary (1995) Postmodern Legal Movements: Law and Jurisprudence at Century's End. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (1993) “Sociology of Law for a Postliberal Society,” 27 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Rev. 89–125.Google Scholar
Nelson, Daniel (1980) Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Novak, William J. (1996) The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Novak, William J. (2000) “Law, Capitalism, and the Liberal State: The Historical Sociology of James Willard Hurst,” 18 Law & History Rev. 97–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1987) “The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline, 1962–1987,” 100 Harvard Law Rev. 761–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1921) The Spirit of the Common Law. Boston: Marshall Jones.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward A. (1973) The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: Univ. Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Reid, John P. (1993) “Law and History,” 27 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Rev. 193–224.Google Scholar
Robinson, Edward S. (1934) “Law—An Unscientific Science,” 44 Yale Law J. 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. (1987) Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics Since Independence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1994) “Modernist Social Science in the Land of the New/Old,” in Ross, D., ed., Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, David J., & Wheeler, Stanton (1981) Introduction to D.J. Rothman & S. Wheeler, eds., Social History and Social Policy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. (1997) “Law And and the Methodology of Law,” 1997 Wisconsin Law Rev. 521–65.Google Scholar
Salyer, Lucy E. (1995) Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry (1984a) “Langdell's Legacy, or the Case of the Empty Envelope,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 1517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry (1984b) “Notes Toward an Intimate, Opinionated, and Affectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry (1995) American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schweber, Howard (1999) “The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education,” 17 Law & History Rev. 145–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, Ronen (1995) Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. (1997) Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Amy Dru (1998) From Bondage to Contract: Wage Labor, Marriage, and the Market in the Age of Slave Emancipation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Robert (1983) Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Terdiman, Richard (1987) Translator's introduction to P. Bourdieu, “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” 38 Hastings Law J. 805–13.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1985a) “The New Deal, Collective Bargaining, and the Triumph of Industrial Pluralism,” 39 Industrial & Labor Relations Rev. 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1985b) The State and the Unions: Law, Labor Relations, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1993) Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1995) “Subordination, Authority, Law: Subjects in Labor History,” 47 International Labor & Working-Class History 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (2000) “The Heavy Burden of the State: Revisiting the History of Labor Law in the Interwar Period,” 23 Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 605–29.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. (1972) “Toward a Social Theory of Law: An Essay on the Study of Law and Development,” 82 Yale Law J. 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M. (1990) “Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement,” 18 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 1–56.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1972) “Lumber and the Legal Process,” 1972 Wisconsin Law Rev. 114–32.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank ([1883] 1968) Dynamic Sociology, or Applied Social Science. 2 vols. New York: Johnson Reprint Corp.Google Scholar
Wayland, Francis (1842) Thoughts on the Present Collegiate System of the United States. Boston: Gould, Kendall & Lincoln.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton (1994) “The Commitment to Social Science: A Case Study of Organizational Innovation,” in Hammack, D. C. & Wheeler, S., eds., Social Science in the Making. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward (1984) “The Inevitability of Critical Legal Studies,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 649–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. Edward (1986) “From Realism to Critical Legal Studies: A Truncated Intellectual History,” 40 Southwestern Law J. 819–43.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward (1997) “The American Law Institute and the Triumph of Modernist Jurisprudence,” 15 Law & History Rev. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, Robert (1967) The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Willrich, Michael (1997) “City of Courts: Crime, Law, and Social Governance in Chicago, 1880–1930.” Ph.D. diss., Dept. of History, Univ. of Chicago.Google Scholar
Willrich, Michael (1998) “The Two Percent Solution: Eugenic Jurisprudence and the Socialization of American Law, 1900–1930,” 16 Law & History Rev. 63–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Case Cited

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar

Statute Cited

Administrative Procedure Act, Pub. L. No. 404, 60 Stat. 237 (1946) [codified as amended at 5 USC § § 551–59, 701–06, 1305, 3105, 3344, 5372, 7521 (1994)].Google Scholar