Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T22:44:35.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Force of Words: Fish, Matsuda, MacKinnon, and the Theory of Discursive Violence

Review products

Fish Stanley, There's No Such Thing as Free Speech … and It's a Good Thing, too. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Pp. viii+332. $25.00.
MacKinnon Catharine A., Only Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993. Pp. 152. $14.95 paper.
Matsuda Mari J., Lawrence Charles R. III, Delgado Richard, and Crenshaw Kimberlé Williams, Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993. Pp. viii+160. $46.50 cloth; $15.95 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Lawrence Douglas
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , 1995 , pp. 169 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

I am grateful to Frank Couvares, Austin Sarat, and Barbara Yngvesson for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

References

Ackerman, Bruce (1991) We the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barendt, Eric (1985) Freedom of Speech. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bollinger, Lee C. (1986) The Tolerant Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald_(1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Easton, Susan (1994) The Problem of Pornography. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1989) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen A. (1991) “Why the Liberal State Can Promote Moral Ideals after All,” 104 Harvard Law Rev. 1350.Google Scholar
Gass, William (1987) “Goodness Knows Nothing of Beauty,” Harper's Magazine, p. 37 (April).Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis Jr. (1993) “Let Them Talk,” New Republic, p. 37 (20 & 27 Sept.).Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen (1993) The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Susan (1993) “Viewing and Doing: Complicating Pornography's Meaning,” 81 Georgetown Law J. 2195.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1987) Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert (1965) “Repressive Tolerance,” in Wolff, R., Moore, B. Jr., & Marcuse, H., eds., A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander (1975 [1961]) “The First Amendment Is an Absolute,” in Kurland, P., ed., Free Speech and Association. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1956 [1859]) On Liberty. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1988) “The Intolerable,” in Mendus, S., ed., Justifying Toleration. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Redish, Martin (1984) Freedom of Expression: A Critical Analysis. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.Google Scholar
Rodgerson, Gillian, & Wilson, Elizabeth (1991) Pornography and Feminism. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Romano, Carlin (1993) “Between the Motion and the Act,” Nation, p. 563 (15 Nov.).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy, ed. (1989) Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J., ed. (1984) Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Berkowitz, Robert (1994) “Disorderly Differences: Recognition, Accommodation, and American Law,” 6 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 285.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick F. (1982) Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick F. (1992) “Speaking of Dignity,” in Meyer, M. & Parent, W. A., eds., The Constitution of Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (1993) Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thurschwell, Adam (1994) “Reading the Law,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T., eds., The Rhetoric of Law. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert (1959) “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law,” 73 Harvard Law Rev. 1959.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

American Booksellers v. Hudnut, 771 F.2d 323 (1985).Google Scholar
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951).Google Scholar
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RA.V. v. St. Paul, 112 S.Ct. 2538 (1992).Google Scholar
Schenk v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Time v. Virgil, 527 F.2d 1122 (1975).Google Scholar
Vance v. Judas Priest, 1990 W.L. 130920 (Nev. Dist. Ct. 1990).Google Scholar