We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Enchantment, Aesthetics, and the Superficial Powers of Modern Law
Review products
Darian-Smith Eve, Bridging Divides: The Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity in the New Europe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999. xvii + 256 pages. $50.00 cloth; $19.95 paper.
Shamir Ronen, The Colonies of Law: Colonialism, Zionism, and Law in Early Mandate Palestine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. xvi + 216 pages. $64.95 cloth.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
02 April 2024
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The author would like to thank Jodi Dean, Peter Fitzpatrick, and Helena Silverstein for reading earlier drafts of this essay.
References
References
Agamben, Giorgio (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life(Daniel Heller-Roazen, translator). Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas, & Rose, Nikolas, eds. (1996) Foucault and Political Reason. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane (1997) “The Enchanted World of Modernity: Paracelsus, Kant, and Deleuze,” 1 Cultural Values1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2000) “Cultivating the Self: Gardening and the Spaces of Property.” Presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Miami Beach, FL (25–28 May).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Richard Nice, translator). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1995) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert (1983) Foreword, “Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harvard Law Rev.4–68.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1976) Of Grammatology (Gayatri Spivak, translator). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura (1987) “Law: A Map of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law,” 14 J. of Law & Society279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryan (1995) “Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from Competition for Transnational Business Disputes,” 29 Law & Society Rev.27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darian-Smith, Eve (1999) Bridging Divides: The Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity in the New Europe. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, & Nead, Lynda, eds. (1999) Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kennan (1999) The Politics of Judgment: Aesthetics, Identity, and Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1988) “The Rise and Rise of Informalism,” in Matthews, R., ed., Informal Justice?London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1992a) “The Impossibility of Popular Justice,” 1 Social & Legal Studies199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1992b) The Mythology of Modern Law. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1995) “Being Social in Socio-Legal Studies,” 22 J. of Law & Society105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (2001a) Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (2001b) “Bare Sovereignty: Homo Sacer and the Insistence of Law,” 5 Theory & Event (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v0005.5.2fitzpatrick.html).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1991) “Governmentality,” in Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P., eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gearey, Adam (2001) Law and Aesthetics. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann (1991) Rights Talk. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter (1991) “Specula Laws: Image, Aesthetic, and Common Law,” 2 Law & Critique 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greider, William (1997) One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Haldar, Piyel (1999) “The Function of the Ornament in Quintilian, Albertini, and Court Architecture,” in Douzinas, C. & Nead, L., eds., Law and the Image. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hussain, Nasser, & Ptacek, Melissa (2000) “Thresholds: Sovereignty and the Sacred,” 34 Law & Society Rev.495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, & Mouffe, Chantai (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmud (1996) Citizen and Subject. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1988) “Legal Pluralism,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 869–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, Alan (1999) “From Law to Popular Justice: Beyond Antinomialism,” in Darian-Smith, E. & Fitzpatrick, P., eds., Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul A. (1999) “A Moral Geography of Liberty: John Stuart Mill and American Free Speech Discourse,” in Darian-Smith, E. & Fitzpatrick, P., eds., Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul A. (2000) “The Governmentality of Discussion,” in Dean, J., ed., Cultural Studies and Political Theory. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul A. (2001) “Governing Sexuality: The Supreme Court's Shift to Containment,” in Goldberg, D. T., Mushena, M., & Bower, L., eds., Between Law and Culture: Relocating Legal Studies. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul A. (forthcoming) Freedom of Speech and the Paradox of Rights. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul A., & Dean, Jodi (2001) “Laws and Societies,” 8 Constellations 376–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward (1978) Orientalism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (1996) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen (2000) The Colonies of Law: Colonialism, Zionism, and Law in Early Mandate Palestine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1984) “An Essay on Rights,” 62 Texas Law Rev.1363–1403.Google Scholar
Case Cited
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816).Google Scholar
Statute Cited
Single European Act (1986) (50 Statutes 490) (1986, Cmnd 9758).Google Scholar