Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:49:45.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Jail Reform Litigation: A Comparative Analysis of Litigation in California Counties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Wayne N. Welsh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Theory linking litigation onset, process, and outcome in jail reform lawsuits has been scarce. The author proposes a four-stage, comparative model: (1) conditions of surrounding legal and political environments, in concert with contextual factors (e.g., type of legal representation), set the stage for litigation in the trigger stage; (2) specific legal claims, defendants named, and litigation strategies shape litigation process at the liability stage; (3) the nature and degree of remedies crafted is shaped by complex interactions between litigants and judges at the remedy stage; and (4) judicial methods and litigant behavior shape negotiations, modifications, and compliance efforts in the postdecree stage. Using qualitative and quantitative research methods, the researcher examined hypotheses linking the four stages. All general-conditions lawsuits against California county jails between 1975 and 1989 (N=43) were coded and analyzed. Critical factors identified at each stage significantly influenced litigation incidence, process, and legal outcomes. The author discusses implications of a multimethod, comparative approach for studying court-ordered reform of public institutions.

Type
The Context of Litigation
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , 1992 , pp. 591 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This research was partially supported by a Doctoral Fellowship awarded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Appreciation for constructive comments and suggestions is extended to three anonymous reviewers. Any errors or omissions are solely those of the author.

References

References

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1984) Jails: Intergovernmental Dimensions of a Local Problem. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John Herbert, & Nelson, Forrest D. (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakel, Samuel Jan (1979) “Special Masters in Institutional Litigation,” 1979 American Bar Foundation Research J. 543.Google Scholar
Call, Jack E. (1986) “Recent Case Law on Overcrowded Conditions of Confinement: An Assessment of Its Impact on Facility Decisionmaking,” in Haas, K. C. & Alpert, G. P., eds., The Dilemmas of Punishment: Readings in Contemporary Corrections. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Champion, Dean J. (1991) “Jail Inmate Litigation in the 1990s,” in Thompson & Mays 1991.Google Scholar
Chilton, Bradley Stewart (1991) Prisons under the Gavel: The Federal Court Takeover of Georgia Prisons. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cleary, Paul D., & Angel, Ronald (1984) “The Analysis of Relationships Involving Dichotomous Dependent Variables,” 25 J. of Health & Social Behavior 334.Google Scholar
Cooper, Phillip J. (1988) Hard Judicial Choices. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Ben M., & Marquart, James W. (1989) An Appeal to Justice: Litigated Reform of Texas Prisons. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
DiIulio, John J. Jr. (1987) Governing Prisons: A Comparative Study of Correctional Management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
DiIulio, John J. Jr., ed. (1990). Courts, Corrections, and the Constitution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, Norman Richard, & Smith, Harry (1981) Applied Regression Analysis. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ekland-Olson, Sheldon, & Martin, Steve J. (1988) “Organizational Compliance with Court-ordered Reform,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 359.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., & Hanson, Roger H. (1986) “What We Know, Think We Know and Would Like to Know about the Impact of Court Orders on Prison Conditions and Jail Crowding.” Presented at meeting of Working Group on Jail and Prison Crowding, Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, National Academy of Sciences, Chicago, IL (15–16 Oct.).Google Scholar
Hanson, Roger H. (1990) “The Impact of Judicial Intervention on Prisons and Jails: A Framework for Analysis and a Review of the Literature,” in DiIulio, 1990.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (1980–81) “The Emergence of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631.Google Scholar
Frug, Gerald E. (1978) “The Judicial Power of the Purse,” 126 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 715.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. (1978) “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” 92 Harvard Law Rev. 353.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Ronald (1975) Jails: The Ultimate Ghetto. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, David J. (1988) “The Legacy of Wolfish and Chapman: Some Thoughts about ”Big Prison Case“ Litigation in the 1980s,” in Robbins 1988:vol. 1.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel B., & Sarat, Austin (1975) “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 321.Google Scholar
Hall, Andy, with Henry, D. Alan, Perlstein, Jolanta J., & Smith, Walter F. (1985) Alleviating Jail Crowding: A Systems Perspective. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Development, Testing, and Dissemination, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric Alan, & Jackson, John E. (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harriman, Linda, & Straussman, Jeffrey D. (1983) “Do Judges Determine Budget Decisions? Federal Court Decisions in Prison Reform and State Spending for Corrections,” 43 Public Administration Rev. 343.Google Scholar
Harris, M. Kay, & Spiller, Dudley P. Jr. (1977) After Decision: Implementation of Judicial Decrees in Correctional Settings. National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Herman, Susan N. (1988) “Prisoners and Due Process Litigation: An Invitation to the State Courts,” in Robbins 1988: vol. 1.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. (1977) The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Huff, C. Ronald (1980) “The Discovery of Prisoners' Rights: A Sociological Analysis,” in Alpert, G. P., ed., Legal Rights of Prisoners. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Irwin, John (1985). The Jail. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick G. (1991) “Competing Ideologies of Jail Confinement,” in Thompson & Mays 1991.Google Scholar
Jacobs, James B. (1980). “The Prisoners' Rights Movement and Its Impacts, 1960-80,” in Morris, N. & Tonry, M., eds., 2 Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel, & Kahn, Robert L. (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Irving R. (1958) “Masters in the Federal Courts: Rule 53,” 58 Columbia Law Rev. 452.Google Scholar
Kessler, Mark (1990) “Legal Mobilization for Social Reform: Power and the Politics of Agenda Setting,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 121.Google Scholar
Kizziah, Carol A. (1984) The State of the Jails in California: Report #1, Overcrowding in the Jails. Sacramento: Board of Corrections, State of California.Google Scholar
Klofas, John (1987) “Patterns of Jail Use,” 15 J. of Criminal Justice 403.Google Scholar
Klofas, John (1990) “The Jail and the Community,” 1 Justice Q. 69.Google Scholar
Koren, Edward I., Boston, John, Alexander, Elizabeth R., & Manville, Daniel E. (1988) “A Primer for Jail Litigators: Some Practical Suggestions for Surviving and Prevailing in Your Lawsuit,” in Robbins 1988: vol. 2.Google Scholar
Landis, J. Richard, & Koch, Gary G. (1977) “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” 33 Biometrics 159.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Daily Journal (1989) “Justices End 7-year Stint as Jail Monitors,” Los Angeles Daily J., 17 Oct., p. 7.Google Scholar
Martin, Steve J., & Ekland-Olson, Sheldon (1987) Texas Prisons: The Walls Came Tumbling Down. Austin: Texas Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Mattick, Hans W. (1974) “The Contemporary Jails of the United States: An Unknown and Neglected Area of Justice,” in Glaser, D., ed., Handbook of Criminology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Belinda R. (1990) “A Micro-level Analysis of Social Structure and Social Control: Intrastate Use of Jail and Prison Confinement,” 7 Justice Q. 325.Google Scholar
McCoy, Candace (1986) “The Impact of Section 1983 Litigation on Policymaking in Corrections: A Malpractice Lawsuit by Any Name Would Smell as Sweet,” in Haas, K. C. & Alpert, G. P., eds., The Dilemmas of Punishment. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Miller, James Grier (1978) Living Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Elizabeth (1980) Comment, “Force and Will: An Exploration of the Use of Special Masters to Implement Judicial Decrees,” 52 Univ. of Colorado Law Rev. 105.Google Scholar
Nathan, Vincent M. (1979) “The Use of Masters in Institutional Reform Litigation,” 10 Univ. of Toledo Law Rev. 419.Google Scholar
National Prison Project (1990) “Status Report: State Prisons and the Courts,” National Prison Project J. No. 22, pp. 7–8, 14–17, 20 (Winter). Washington, DC: National Prison Project of the A.C.L.U.Google Scholar
Neuborne, Burt (1981) “Toward Procedural Parity in Constitutional Litigation,” 22 William & Mary Law Rev. 725.Google Scholar
Palmer, John W. (1985) Constitutional Rights of Prisoners. 3d ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
Pontell, Henry N. (1984) A Capacity to Punish: The Ecology of Crime and Punishment. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Ira P., ed. (1988) Prisoners and the Law. 2 vols. New York: Clark Boardman.Google Scholar
Sieber, Sam D. (1981) Fatal Remedies. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, Susan (1985) “Special Masters Aid in Compliance Efforts,” National Prison Project J. No. 6, p. 9 (Winter). Washington, DC: National Prison Project of the A.C.L.U.Google Scholar
Swafford, Michael (1980) “Three Parametric Techniques for Contingency Table Analysis: A Nontechnical Commentary,” 45 American Sociological Rev. 664.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G., & Fidell, Linda S. (1983) Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Taft, Philip B. Jr. (1983) “Jail Litigation: Winning in Court Is Only Half the Battle,” 9 Corrections Magazine, No. 3, p. 22 (June).Google Scholar
Thomas, Jim, Keeler, Devin, & Harris, Kathy (1986) “Issues and Misconceptions in Prisoner Litigation: A Critical View,” 24 Criminology 775.Google Scholar
Thompson, Joel, & Mays, G. Larry, eds. (1991) American Jails: Public Policy Issues. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, William Bennett (1973) “Federal Jurisdiction and Practice in Prisoner Cases,” in Hermann, M. G. & Haft, M. G., eds., 1 Prisoners' Rights Sourcebook. New York: Clark Boardman.Google Scholar
University of Illinois Law Forum (1980) “Preiser v. Rodriguez in Retrospect,” in Robbins, I. P., ed., 2 Prisoners' Rights Sourcebook. Rev. ed. New York: Clark Boardman.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1990) Census of Local Jails 1988. Bulletin NCJ-121101. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1991) Jail Inmates 1990. Bulletin NCJ-129756. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Welsh, Wayne N., Leone, Matthew C., Kinkade, Patrick T., & Pontell, Henry N. (1991) “The Politics of Jail Overcrowding: Public Attitudes and Official Policies,” in Thompson & Mays 1991.Google Scholar
Welsh, Wayne N., & Pontell, Henry N. (1991) “Counties in Court: Interorganizational Adaptations to Jail Litigation in California,” 25 Law & Society Rev. 73.Google Scholar
Welsh, Wayne N., Pontell, Henry N., Leone, Matthew C., & Kinkade, Patrick (1990) “Jail Overcrowding: An Analysis of Policy Makers' Perceptions,” 7 Justice Q. 341.Google Scholar
Yackle, Larry W. (1989) Reform and Regret. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Yale Law Journal (1979) Note, “‘Mastering’ Intervention in Prisons,” 88 Yale Law J. 1062.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979).Google Scholar
Branson v. Winter, No. 78807 (Cal. Super. Ct., County of Santa Clara, 21 Aug. 1981).Google Scholar
Casselman v. Graham, Civil No. S-86-1266 (E.D. Cal., filed 4 Aug. 1987).Google Scholar
Cherco v. County of Sonoma, Nos. C-80-0334, C-82-3767 (N.D. Cal., filed 1 July 1982).Google Scholar
In re Chessman, 44 Cal. 2d 1; 279 P. 2d 24 (1955).Google Scholar
Fischer v. Winter, 564 F. Supp. 281 (N.D. Cal., 1983).Google Scholar
In re Gallego, 133 Cal. 3d 75, 183 Cal. Rptr. 715 (1982).Google Scholar
Golden v. Taylor, Civil No. S-86-287 (E.D. Cal., 14 March 1986).Google Scholar
Hedrick v. Grant, Civil No. S-76-162 (E.D. Cal., filed 13 Nov. 1976).Google Scholar
Occhino v. United States, 686 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir. 1982).Google Scholar
Pasadena City Bd. of Educ. v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 (1976).Google Scholar
Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981).Google Scholar
Stewart v. Gates, 450 F. Supp. 583 (C.D. Cal. 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inmates of Sybil Brand Inst. for Women v. County of Los Angeles, 130 Cal. App. 3d 89, 181 Cal. Rptr. 599 (1982).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1970).Google Scholar
California Administrative Code, title 15, subchapter 4, 1000 et seq. (West 1954 & 1992 Supp.).Google Scholar
California Health & Safety Code (West 1954 & 1992 Supp.).Google Scholar
California Penal Code, pt. 2, title 12 (West 1954 & 1992 Supp.).Google Scholar