We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Decisions to Imprison: Court Decision-Making Inside and Outside the Law. By Rasmus H. Wandall Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate, 2007. Pp. xi+203. $99.95 cloth.
Review products
Decisions to Imprison: Court Decision-Making Inside and Outside the Law. By Rasmus H. Wandall Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate, 2007. Pp. xi+203. $99.95 cloth.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
01 January 2024
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Eisenstein, James, & Jacob, Herbert (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm (1979) The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, & Simon, Jonathan (1992) “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications,” 30Criminology 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Michael, & Piper, Christine (1990) How the Law Thinks About Children. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Gower.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Trans. Alex Ziegert. Ed. Kastner, Fatima, Nobles, Richard, Schiff, David, & Ziegert, Rosamund. Oxford and New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Priban, Jiri, & Nelken, David, eds. (2001) Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1989) “How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law,” 23Law & Society Rev. 727–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar