Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:24:41.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crime Rates, Sanction Levels, and Constraints on Prison Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years there has been an accumulation of analyses showing a negative association between crime rates and various measures of criminal sanctions, which have been widely interpreted as evidence of the deterrent effect of sanctions (see Tullock, 1974; Tittle, 1973; van den Haag, 1975). In this paper, results are presented that are in conflict with such an interpretation. For the sanction of imprisonment (time served in prison and the risk of imprisonment given commission of a crime), the analysis indicates that the negative association is more readily interpreted as a negative effect of crime rates on sanction levels rather than its reverse—a deterrent effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

This study was supported by PHS Research Grant No. 1 ROl MH 2837-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency.

References

ANDENAES, Johannes (1974) Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
ANTUNES, George and A.L., HUNT (1973) “The Deterrent Impact of Criminal Sanctions: Some Implications for Criminal Justice Policy,” 51 Journal of Urban Law 145.Google Scholar
AVIO, Kenneth and Scott, CLARK (1974) Property Crime in Canada: An Econometric Study, prepared for the Ontario Economic Council.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred and Jacqueline, COHEN (1973) “A Theory of the Stability of Punishment,” 64 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 198.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred and Daniel, NAGIN (1977) “The Deterrent Effect of Legal Sanctions on Draft Evasion,” 29 Stanford Law Review 241.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred, Jacqueline, COHEN and Daniel, NAGIN (1976), “The Dynamics of a Homeostatic Punishment Process,” 67 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 317.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred, Jacqueline, COHEN and Daniel, NAGIN (eds.) (1978) Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crimes Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
CARR-HILL, R. A. and H. H., STERN (1973) “An Econometric Model of the Supply and Control of Recorded Offenses in England and Wales,” 2 Journal of Public Economics 289.Google Scholar
COOK, Philip (1977) “Punishment and Crime: A Critique of Current Findings Concerning the Preventive Effect of Criminal Sanction,” 41 Law and Contemporary Problems 164.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac (1970) Participation in Illegitimate Activities: An Economic Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Columbia University.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac (1973) “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation, 81 Journal of Political Economy 565.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac (1975) “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death,” 65 American Economic Review 397.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac and Mark, RANDALL (1977) “Fear of Deterrence: A Critical Evaluation of the Report of the Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitation Effect,” 6 Journal of Legal Studies 283.Google Scholar
FISHER, Franklin (1966) The Identification Problem in Econometrics New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
FISHER, Franklin M. and Daniel, NAGIN (1978) “On the Feasibility of Identifying the Crime Function in a Simultaneous Model of Crime Rates and Sanction Levels,” in Blumstein, et al. (1978).Google Scholar
FORST, Brian (1976) “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: Further Empirical Findings,” 2 Policy Analysis 477.Google Scholar
GIBBS, Jack B. (1968) “Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence,” 48 Social Science Quarterly 515.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David (1977a) “The Dynamics of Oscillatory Punishment Processes,” 68 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 643.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David (1977b) “Crime, Deterrence Research, and Social Policy” in Nagel, Stuart (ed.), Modeling the Criminal Justice System Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
LIPSCOMB, Joseph, Lawrence, BERG, Virginia, LONDON and Paul, NUTTING (1976) Health Status Maximization and Manpower Allocation Durham, N.C.: Duke University, Institute of Policy Sciences and Public Affairs (Working Paper No. 7761).Google Scholar
LOGAN, Charles H. (1971) “On Punishment and Crime (Chiricos and Waldo, 1970): Some Methodological Commentary,” 19 Social Problems 280.Google Scholar
LOGAN, Charles H. (1972) “General Deterrent Effects of Imprisonment,” 51 Social Forces 64.Google Scholar
LOGAN, Charles H. (1975) “Arrest Rates and Deterrence,” 56 Social Science Quarterly 376.Google Scholar
NAGIN, Daniel (1978) “General Deterrence: A Review of the Empirical Evidence,” in Blumstein, et al. (1978).Google Scholar
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE (1977) Prison Population and Policy Choices, Volume I: Preliminary Report to Congress Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
ORSAGH, Thomas (1973) “Crime, Sanctions, and Scientific Explanation,” 64 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 354.Google Scholar
SJOQUIST, David (1973) “Property Crime and Economic Behavior: Some Empirical Results,” 83 American Economic Review 439.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles (1969) “Crime Rates and Legal Sanctions,” 16 Social Problems 408.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles (1973) “Punishment and Deterrence of Deviance,” in Rottenberg, Simon (ed.), The Economics of Crime and Punishment Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles and A. R., ROWE (1974) “Certainty of Arrest and Crime Rates: A Further Test of the Deterrence Hypothesis,” 52 Social Forces 455.Google Scholar
TULLOCK, Gordon (1974) “Does Punishment Deter Crime?” 36 Public Interest 103.Google Scholar
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (1973) Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 1973 (94th edition). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1960) Uniform Crime Report Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1970) Uniform Crime Report Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1960) National Prisoner Statistics: Characteristics of State Prisoners, 1960. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1974) National Prisoner Statistics: Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities: 1974 (Advance Report). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1930 through 1970) National Prisoner Statistics: Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
VANDAELE, Walter (1978) “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: I. Ehrlich Revisited,” in Blumstein, et al. (1978).Google Scholar
VAN DEN HAAG, Ernest (1975) Punishing Criminals. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
WILSON, James Q. and Barbara, BOLAND (1976) “Crime” in Gorman, William and Glazer, Nathan (eds.), The Urban Predicament Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
ZIMRING, Franklin M. and Gordon J., HAWKINS (1973) Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar