Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
ADAMANY, DAVID
and
GROSSMAN, JOEL B.
1983.
SUPPORT FOR THE SUPREME COURT AS A NATIONAL POLICYMAKER.
Law & Policy,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
405.
Gates, John B.
1984.
The American Supreme Court and Electoral Realignment: A Critical Review.
Social Science History,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
267.
Gates, John B.
and
Cohen, Jeffrey E.
1988.
Presidents, Supreme Court justices, and racial equality cases: 1954?1984.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
22.
Marshall, Thomas R.
1989.
Policymaking and the Modern Court: When do Supreme Court Rulings Prevail?.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 4,
p.
493.
Gates, John B.
1989.
Supreme Court Voting and Realigning Issues: A Microlevel Analysis of Supreme Court Policy Making and Electoral Realignment.
Social Science History,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 3,
p.
255.
Canon, Bradley C.
1992.
The Supreme Court as a Cheerleader in Politico-Moral Disputes.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 3,
p.
637.
Taylor, John B.
1992.
The Supreme Court and Political Eras: A Perspective on Judicial Power in a Democratic Polity.
The Review of Politics,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 3,
p.
345.
Rosenberg, Gerald N.
1992.
Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.
The Review of Politics,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 3,
p.
369.
Gely, Rafael
and
Spiller, Pablo T.
1992.
The political economy of supreme court constitutional decisions: The case of Roosevelt's court-packing plan.
International Review of Law and Economics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
Sheehan, Reginald S.
1996.
SOLICITOR GENERAL, PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENT, AND THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
55.
Toma, Eugenia F.
1996.
A contractual model of the voting behavior of the supreme court: The role of the chief justice.
International Review of Law and Economics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
433.
Heberlig, Eric
and
Spill, Rorie
2000.
CONGRESS AT COURT: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS AMICUS CURIAE.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
189.
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Klein, David E.
2006.
The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Clark, Tom S.
2009.
The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 4,
p.
971.
Segal, Jeffrey A.
Westerland, Chad
and
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
2011.
Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Kelemen, R. Daniel D.
2011.
The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Kelemen, R. Daniel
2012.
The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union.
Journal of European Public Policy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Corley, Pamela C.
2013.
National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes at the United States Supreme Court.
Publius: The Journal of Federalism,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
151.
Parkin, Michael
and
Wedeking, Justin
2017.
Connecting with the Courts: Online Access to State Judicial Systems.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
22.
Moyer, Laura P.
and
Key, Ellen M.
2018.
Political Opportunism, Position Taking, and Court-curbing Legislation.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.