Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:59:02.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counties in Court: Interorganizational Adaptations to Jail Litigation in California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Wayne N. Welsh  and
Henry N. Pontell
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Criminal justice systems have been described as fragmented and decentralized “nonsystems,” but sudden changes in the environments of criminal justice organizations may affect the loose coupling that normally characterizes such agencies. Court orders against county jails create pressures to tighten the loose coupling among local organizational subsystems: the jail, law enforcement, courts, probation, and county government. Using interviews with key officials, court documents, and other archival data, we examined changes in interorganizational relations in three California counties under court orders to reform local jails. While court orders eventually resulted in tighter coupling of the subsystems and more proactive interagency responses, the more reactive mode of response characteristic of loosely coupled subsystems initially led to increased interagency conflict. Adaptations were influenced by the legal, political, and organizational environments of each jurisdiction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 1991 , pp. 73 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This research was supported by a doctoral fellowship awarded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; a faculty research grant from the Academic Senate, University of California, Irvine; and the Guggenheim Program in Criminal Justice, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley.

A previous version of this paper was presented at the Law and Society Association annual meetings, Berkeley, 3 June 1990.

References

References

ALDRICH, Howard E. (1979) Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
ANGELL, Robert C. (1968) [1933] “The Value of Sociology to Law,” in Simon, R. J. (ed.), The Sociology of Law: Interdisciplinary Readings. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
BALBUS, Issac (1973) The Dialectics of Legal Repression. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
BENNIS, Warren (1976) “Leadership: A Beleaguered Species?” 5 Organizational Dynamics 3.Google Scholar
BERK, Richard A., and Peter H., ROSSI (1977) Prison Reform and State Elites. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
BRAGER, George, and Stephen, HOLLOWAY (1978) Changing Human Service Organizations: Politics and Practice. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
BRAKEL, Samuel J. (1979) “Special Masters in Institutional Litigation,” 3 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 543.Google Scholar
BRONSTEIN, Alvin J. (1980) “Offender Rights Litigation: Historical and Future Developments,” in Robbins, Ira P. (ed.), Prisoners' Rights Sourcebook, Vol. 2. New York: Clark Boardman.Google Scholar
BROWN, Don W., and Donald W., CROWLEY (1979) “The Societal Impact of Law: An Assessment of Research,” 1 Law and Policy Quarterly 253.Google Scholar
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF CORRECTIONS (1985) The State of the Jails in California: Report 2, Prisoner Flow and Release. Sacramento: California Board of Corrections.Google Scholar
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF CORRECTIONS (1986) Report to the Legislature. Sacramento: California Board of Corrections.Google Scholar
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF CORRECTIONS (1988) Report to the Legislature. Sacramento: California Board of Corrections.Google Scholar
CHAMPION, Dean J. (1990) “Jail Inmate Litigation in the 1990s,” in Thompson, Joel A. and Mays, G. L. (eds.), American Jails: Public Policy Issues. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
COHEN, Michael D., MARCH, James G., and Johan P., OLSEN (1972) “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” 17 Administrative Science Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
COLEMAN, James S. (1957) Community Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
COOPER, Phillip J. (1988) Hard Judicial Choices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CORRECTIONAL CONSULTANTS OF CALIFORNIA (1988) A Report on the Current Conditions of Confinement at Orange County Detention Facilities. Brea: Correctional Consultants of California.Google Scholar
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE (1986) Systems Approach to Jail Overcrowding in Orange County. Santa Ana, CA: County of Orange.Google Scholar
CRANK, John P. (1989) “The Influence of Environmental and Organizational Factors on Police Style in Urban and Rural Environments,” 27 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 166.Google Scholar
CROUCH, Ben M., and James W., MARQUART (1989) An Appeal to Justice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
CULLEN, Francis T., CLARK, Gregory A., and John F., WOZNIAK (1985) “Explaining the Get Tough Movement: Can the Public Be Blamed?” 49 Federal Probation 16.Google Scholar
DEXTER, Lewis A. (1970) Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
DUFFEE, David (1989) “Introduction: Special Issue on Instrumental, Human, and Institutional Processes in Criminal Justice Organizations,” 26 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 107.Google Scholar
EISENSTEIN, James, and Herbert, JACOB (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
EKLAND-OLSON, Sheldon, and Steve J., MARTIN (1988) “Organizational Compliance With Court-ordered Reform,” 22 Law & Society Review 359.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1973) “Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective,” 7 Law & Society Review 407.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1983) Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm M., and Roger P., HANSON (1986) “What We Know, Think We Know and Would Like to Know About the Impact of Court Orders on Prison Conditions and Jail Crowding.” Presented at the meeting of the Working Group on Jail and Prison Crowding, Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, National Academy of Sciences, Chicago.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm M., and Mark H., LAZERSON (1983) “Police-Prosecutor Relationships: An Interorganizational Analysis,” in Boyum, K. O. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
FORST, Martin L. (1977) “To What Extent Should the Criminal Justice System Be a ‘System‘?” 23 Crime and Delinquency 403.Google Scholar
GETTINGER, Stephen H. (1984) New Generation Jails: An Innovative Approach to an Age-old Problem. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Dept. of Justice.Google Scholar
GIBBS, Jack (1986) “Punishment and Deterrence: Theory, Research, and Penal Policy,” in Lipson, L. and Wheeler, S. (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
GOTTFREDSON, Stephen D., and Ralph B., TAYLOR (1987) “Attitudes of Correctional Policymakers and the Public,” in Gottfredson, S. D. and McConville, S. (eds.), America's Correctional Crisis: Prison Populations and Public Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John (1989) “Why Is There So Little Criminal Justice Theory? Neglected Macro- and Micro-Level Links Between Organization and Power,” 26 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 116.Google Scholar
HALL, Andy (1985) Alleviating Jail Overcrowding: A Systems Perspective. Washington, DC: Office of Development, Testing, and Dissemination, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
HALL, Richard H., and John P., CLARK (1975) “Problems in the Study of Inter-organizational Relationships,” in Negandhi, A. R. (ed.), Interorganization Theory. Kent, OH: Comparative Administration Research Institute, Center for Business and Economic Research, Kent State University.Google Scholar
HARRIMAN, Linda, and Jeffrey D., STRAUSSMAN (1983) “Do Judges Determine Budget Decisions?” 43 Public Administration Review 343.Google Scholar
HARRIS, M. Kay, and Dudley P., SPILLER Jr. (1977) After Decision: Implementation of Judicial Decrees in Correctional Settings. National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
HOMANS, George C. (1950) The Human Group. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
HOROWITZ, Donald L. (1977) The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1983) “Courts as Organizations,” in Boyum, K. O. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
JACOBS, James B. (1980) “The Prisoners' Rights Movement and Its Impacts, 1960–80,” in Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (eds.), Crime and Justice, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KATZ, Daniel, and Robert L., KAHN (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
KAUFMAN, Gerald (1985) “The National Prison Overcrowding Project: Policy Analysis and Politics, A New Approach,” 478 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 161.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert L. (1975) “Afterword: Change and Structure in Dispute Processing.” 9 Law & Society Review 385.Google Scholar
KIZZIAH, Carol A. (1984) The State of the Jails in California: Report 1, Overcrowding in the Jails. Sacramento: Board of Corrections, State of California.Google Scholar
KLOFAS, John (1987) “Patterns of Jail Use,” 15 Journal of Criminal Justice 403.Google Scholar
KLOFAS, John (1990) “The Jail and the Community,” 7 Justice Quarterly 69.Google Scholar
KOEHLER, Cortus T. (1983) Managing California Counties: Serving People, Solving Problems. Sacramento: County Supervisors Association of California.Google Scholar
LANG, Karen Sorensen (1988) Santa Clara County Electronic Monitoring Program: Final Evaluation Report. San Jose, CA: Quorum.Google Scholar
LANDIS, J. Richard, and Gary G., KOCH (1977) “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” 33 Biometrics 159.Google Scholar
LEWIN, Kurt (1951) Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
LOFLAND, John (1971) Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
MARTIN, Steve J., and Sheldon, EKLAND-OLSON (1987) Texas Prisons: The Walls Came Tumbling Down. Austin: Texas Monthly Press.Google Scholar
MATTICK, Hans W. (1974) “The Contemporary Jails of the United States: An Unknown and Neglected Area of Justice,” in Glaser, D. (ed.), Handbook of Criminology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
MAYS, G. Larry, and Frances P., BERNAT (1988) “Jail Reform Litigation: The Issue of Rights and Remedies,” 12 American Journal of Criminal Justice 254.Google Scholar
McGREGOR, Douglas (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
MERTON, Robert K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
MONTGOMERY, Elizabeth (1980) “Force and Will: An Exploration of the Use of Special Masters to Implement Judicial Decrees,” 52 University of Toledo Law Review 105.Google Scholar
NATHAN, Vincent M. (1979) “The Use of Masters in Institutional Reform Litigation,” 10 University of Toledo Law Review 419.Google Scholar
NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT (1990) “Status Report: State Prisons and the Courts,” 22 Journal of the National Prison Project 7.Google Scholar
PARSONS, Talcott (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
PONTELL, Henry N. (1984) A Capacity to Punish: The Ecology of Crime and Punishment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
POUND, Roscoe. (1968) [1907] “The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence,” in Simon, R. J. (ed.), The Sociology of Law: Interdisciplinary Readings. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (1968) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
REISS, Albert (1971) The Police and the Public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ROSSUM, Ralph A. (1978) The Politics of the Criminal Justice System. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
SCHUMACHER, Michael (1987) Supervised Electronic Confinement Pilot Program. Final Report. Santa Ana, CA: Orange County Probation Department.Google Scholar
SELZNICK, Philip (1957) Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
SIEBER, Sam D. (1981) Fatal Remedies. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome (1966) Justice Without Trial. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
SLOVAK, Jeffrey S. (1986) Styles of Urban Policing: Organization, Environment, and Police Styles in Selected American Cities. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
STOGDILL, Ralph M. (1974) Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
STURM, Susan (1985) “Special Masters Aid in Compliance Efforts,” 6 National Prison Project Journal 9.Google Scholar
SUSSKIND, Lawrence, and Jeffrey, CRUIKSHANK (1987) Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
TAFT, Philip B. Jr. (1983) “Jail Litigation: Winning in Court Is Only Half the Battle,” 9 Corrections Magazine 22.Google Scholar
UCLA LAW REVIEW (1973) Note: “Judicial Intervention in Corrections: The California Experience—An Empirical Study,” 20 UCLA Law Review 452.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1990) Jail Inmates 1989. Bulletin NCJ-123264. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Justice.Google Scholar
VAN DE VEN, Andrew H., and Diane L., FERRY (1980) Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
WEICK, Karl (1976) “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems,” 21 Administrative Science Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
WELSH, Wayne N., LEONE, Matthew C., KINKADE, Patrick T., and Henry N., PONTELL (1991) “The Politics of Jail Overcrowding: Public Attitudes and Official Policies,” in Thompson, J. A. and Mays, G. L. (eds.), American Jails: Public Policy Issues. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
WELSH, Wayne N., PONTELL, Henry N., LEONE, Matthew C., and Patrick, KINKADE (1990) “Jail Overcrowding: An Analysis of Policy Makers' Perceptions,” 7 Justice Quarterly 341.Google Scholar
WENER, Richard, William, FRAZIER, and Jay, FARBSTEIN (1987) “Building Better Jails,” Psychology Today, June, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YACKLE, Larry W. (1989) Reform and Regret. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1979) Note: “‘Mastering’ Intervention in Prisons,” 88 Yale Law Journal 1062.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Beck v. County of Santa Clara; Winter v. County of Santa Clara, 251 Cal. Rptr. 444 (Cal. App. 6 Dist. 1988).Google Scholar
Branson v. Winter, No. 78807 (Cal. Super. Ct., County of Santa Clara, 21 Aug. 1981, 10 Oct. 1981, 4 Dec. 1981, 19 March 1982, 22 Nov. 1982, 1 Feb. 1984, 24 June 1985, 8 April 1986, 7 May 1986, 17 June 1986).Google Scholar
Fischer v. Geary, 564 F. Supp. 281 (N.D. Cal. 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer v. Winter (N.D. Cal., filed 26 Dec. 1987). “Report of Court Appointed Expert Persuant to Order of October 5, 1987 re: Classification and County Population Projections.”.Google Scholar
Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291 (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar
Miller v. Carson, 401 F. Supp. 835 (M.D. Fla. 1975).Google Scholar
Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981).Google Scholar
Stewart v. Gates, 450 F. Supp. 583 (C.D. Cal. 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson v. Superior Court (Branson), 240 Cal. Rptr. 131 (Cal. App. 6 Dist. 1987).Google Scholar
Yancey v. Rainey, No. 29868 (Cal. Super. Ct., County of Contra Costa, March 31, 1985).Google Scholar