Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:59:55.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conclusion: Disputes and Reported Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1975

Bliss Cartwright
Bliss Cartwright*
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“… the judicial opinion is a human document and a fascinating record, there, for anybody's use. From the standpoint of behavioral study these are data in which so many factors are held equal as to outrun the results of an ordinary ten-or even hundred-thousand-dollar grant. All there. All waiting. Already gathered. Merely neglected,” (K. Llewellyn, 1960:514).

Reported opinions are a rich source of dispute data. Ideally they answer a wide variety of questions: who are the parties, what do they want, where have they gone for redress, how was the dispute processed, when was it resolved? Many of these questions can be answered with case data, but caution is required. Disputes leaves trails and traces in many places. Judicial opinions capture part of the story (namely, the official response to specified claims on a particular occasion), but they are spotty dissiers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 9 , Issue 2: Litigation and Dispute Processing: Part II , Winter 1975 , pp. 369 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

Work on this note was supported in part by N.S.F. Grant GS-384-13, An Historical and Comparative Study of State Supreme Courts, in collaboration with L. Friedman, R. Kagan, S. Wheeler. Special thanks to the project coders and research assistants especially D. Polise, who brought cheer and craft to the least glamorous but most important job of all, data cleaning.

References

Cases

Alton R.R. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n, 407 Ill. 202 (1950).Google Scholar
B & L Pharmacy v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 46 Ill. 2d 1 (1970).Google Scholar
Bell v. District Court, 28 Nev. 280 (1905).Google Scholar
Boyton v. Ingalls, 70 Me. 461 (1880).Google Scholar
Cannon v. Cannon, 225 N.C. 611 (1945).Google Scholar
Dahlstom v. Featherstone, 18 Ida. 179 (1910).Google Scholar
Gooch v. Peebles, 165 N.C. 411 (1890).Google Scholar
Howe v. Harper, 127 N.C. 356 (1910).Google Scholar
Jacksonville Nat'l Bank v. Beesley, 159 Ill. 120 (1895).Google Scholar
Matthiessen v. Ott, 268 Ill. 569 (1915).Google Scholar
Atlantic and St. Lawrence R.R., Appellants, 100 Me. 430 (1905).Google Scholar
Rydalch v. Glauner, 83 Ida. 108 (1961).10.1049/pi-c.1961.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savings Institute v. Johnson, 133 Me. 445 (1935).Google Scholar
State v. Overby, 90 Ida. 41 (1965).10.1111/j.1751-0813.1965.tb08812.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrence v. Strong, 4 Ore. 39 (1870).10.1093/nq/s4-VI.132.39dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trust Co. v. Bass, 265 N.C. 218 (1965).Google Scholar
Wilson v. Bittick, 63 Cal. 2d 30 (1965).10.1508/cytologia.30.supplement_63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS (1973) (Semi-Annual Report of the Director.) Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1973) “The Mobilization of Law,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 125.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Donald T. (1974a) “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change,” Background Paper for the Dartmouth/OECD Seminar on Social Research and Public Policies, on file with the author.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Donald T. (1974b) “Quasi-Experimental Designs,” in Riecken, H.W. and Boruch, R. F. (eds.) Social Experimentation: A Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Intervention. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CARTWRIGHT, Bliss C. and R. Stephen, WARNER (Forthcoming) “The Medium is not the Message: A Critique of Talcott Parsons on Money, Power, Influence and Values,” in Loubser, J., Baum, R., Efrat, A., and Lidz, V. (eds.) Explorations in General Theory in the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
EBERSOLE, J.L. and James A., HALL Jr. (1972) Courtran: A Management Information and Research System for Courts. Washington: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1965) Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GLICK, Henry R. and Kenneth N., VINES (1973) State Court Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B. and Austin, SARAT (1975) “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective,” 9 Law & Society Review 321.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Peter (1974) “The Michigan Supreme Court,” Unpublished Paper, State Supreme Court Project, Yale Law School, on file with the author.Google Scholar
HORWITZ, Morton J. (1974) “The Historical Foundations of Modern Contract Law,” 87 Harvard Law Review 917.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1964) Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836-1915. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1971) “Legal Elements in United States History,” in Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard (eds.) Law in American History. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert L. (1974) “Formal Litigation and Professional Insecurity: Legal Entrepreneurship in South India,” 9 Law & Society Review 11.Google Scholar
LEVY, Leonard W. (1967) The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw. New York: Harper Torch Books.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl N. (1960) The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
MAYHEW, Leon H. (1971) “Stability and Change in Legal Systems,” in Barber, Bernard and Inkeles, Alex (eds.) Stability and Social Change. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
MORRISON, Charles (1974) “Clerks and Clients: Paraprofessional Roles and Cultural Identities in Indian Litigation,” 9 Law & Society Review 39.Google Scholar
NIHAN, Charles W. (1974) Courtran II: An Assessment of Applications and Computer Requirements.” Washington: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
NONET, Philippe (1969) Administrative Justice: Advocacy and Change in a Government Agency. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
SCHEIBER, Harry N. and McCURDY, Charles W. (1975) “Eminent Domain Law and Western Agriculture,” 49 Agricultural History 112.Google Scholar
WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COUNCIL (1969) Statistics. Madison: Wisconsin Judicial Council.Google Scholar