Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T07:20:01.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Analysis of Patterns of Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions

“Miranda” and the Police in Four Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Neal Milner
Neal Milner*
Affiliation:
Grinnell College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political scientists until recently have ignored the study of the process involved in complying with Supreme Court decisions. As Richard M. Johnson (1967: 4) has stated, to neglect such studies “is to neglect an indispensable segment of the total judicial process.” Despite the increasing awareness of the importance of this aspect to the judicial process, there are still almost no studies which attempt a comparative analysis of patterns of compliance with or resistance to Supreme Court decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , August 1970 , pp. 119 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cases

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA (1966) 384 U.S. 436.Google Scholar
STATE v. MILLER (1967) 35 Wis. 2d 454; 151 N.W. 2d 157.Google Scholar

References

BIRKBY, R. H. (1966) “The Supreme Court and the Bible Belt: Tennessee reaction to the Schempp decision.” Midwest J. of Pol. Sci. 10 (August): 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLUMBERG, A. (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
CARR-SAUNDERS, A. M. (1966) “Professionalization in historical perspective,” Pp. 3–9 in Vollmer, H. M. and Mills, D. E. (eds.) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
DALBEY, D. (1967) Police Interrogation and the Miranda Rule. Washington: FBI National Academy.Google Scholar
DEUTSCHER, I. (1966) “Words and deeds: social science and social policy.” Social Problems 13 (Winter): 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FROMAN, L. A. (1968) “The categorization of policy content,” Pp. 41–54 in Ranney, A. (ed.) Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
GREENWOOD, E. (1966) “The elements of professionalization,” Pp. 10–19 in Vollmer, H. M. and Mills, D. G. (eds.) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
HALL, R. H. (1968) “Professionalization and bureaucratization.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 33 (February): 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, R. M. (1967) The Dynamics of Compliance. Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
KRISLOV, S. (1963) “The perimeters of power: patterns of compliance and opposition to Supreme Court decisions.” Presented to the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
MILNER, N. A. (1968) “The impact of the Miranda decision on four Wisconsin communities.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
MUIR, W. (1968) Prayer in the Public Schools. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
PATRIC, G. (1957) “The impact of a court decision: the aftermath of the McCollum case.” J. of Public Law 6 (Fall): 455–463.Google Scholar
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice Task Force (1967) Report: The Police. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr. [ed.] (1968) President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Studies in Crime and Law Enforcement in Major Metropolitan Areas. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, M. (1968) The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, J. (1966) Justice without Trial. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
SORAUF, F. J. (1959) “Zcrach v. Clausen', the impact of a Supreme Court decision.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 53 (September): 777–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOLLMER, H. M. and D. G., MILLS (1966) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
WILSON, J. (1968) Varieties of Police Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILSON, J. (1966) “The police and the delinquent in two cities,” Pp. 184–193 in Bordua, D. (ed.) The Police: Six Sociological Essays. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Yale Law J. [Note] (1967) “Interrogations in New Haven: the impact of Miranda.” 6 (July): 1519–1648.Google Scholar