No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comment on Simon and Lynch
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1f52/e1f52308e6cda204732e5a0a2b2856bb47ed28ea" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Article Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.
References
ANJOU, L. J. M., d' (1986) Actoren en Factoren in het Wetgevingsproces. Deventer: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
BENDA-BECKMANN, K. von, and A. J., HOEKEMA (eds.) (1987) Horizontaal Bestuur. The Hague: Vuga. Also as special issue of Recht der Werkelijkheid 1987:2.Google Scholar
BLACK, D. (ed.) (1984) Toward a General Theory of Social Control Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GALANTER, M. (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering and Indigenous Law,” 19 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1.Google Scholar
GALANTER, M. (1974) “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Social Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95.Google Scholar
HESSING, D. J., H., ELFFERS, R. H., WEIGEL, and K. A., KINSEY (1988) “Tax Evasion Research: Measurement Strategies and Theoretical Models,” in van Raaij, W. F., Wärmeryd, K. E., and van Veldhoven, G. M. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
JO WELL, J. L. (1975) Law and Bureaucracy: Administrative Discretion and the Limits of Legal Action. New York: Dunellen Pub. Co.Google Scholar
KAGAN, R. A. (1978) Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
KNEGT, R. (1986) Regels en Redelijkheid en de Bijstandsverlening: Participerende Observatie bij een Sociale Dienst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
KONING, P. de (1988) “Bureaucrat-Client Interaction: Normative Pluralism in the Implementation of Social Security Disability Laws,” in von Benda-Beckmann, F. et al. (eds.), Between Kinship and the State: Social Security and Law in Developing Countries. Dordrechts: Foris.Google Scholar
LIPSKY, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, N. (1986) “The Self-Production of Law and Its Limits.” In: G. Teubner (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUHMANN, N. (1985) “Einige Probleme mit reflexivem Recht.” 6 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 6: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACAULAY, S. (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study, 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
SIMITIS, S. (1985) “Zur Verrechtlichung der Arbeitsbeziehungen,” in Kubier, F. (ed.), Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität: Vergleichende Analysen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, G., and H., WILLKE (1984) “Kontext and Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht,” 1 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 4.Google Scholar
TREIBER, H. (1983) “Regulative Politik in der Krise? Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen Thema oder Reflexive Rationalität im Schatten des gesatzten Rechts,” 1983 Kriminalsoziologische Bibliogaphie 28.Google Scholar
UNGER, R. M. (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
VOIGT, R. (ed.) (1983a) Gegentendenzen zur Verrechtlichung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WASSENBERG, A. F. P. (1982), ”Neo-Corporatism and the Quest for Control: The Cuckoo Game,” in Lehmbruch, G. and G. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar