Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T04:21:53.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivating Environmental Action in a Pluralistic Regulatory Environment: An Experimental Study of Framing, Crowding Out, and Institutional Effects in the Context of Recycling Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Yuval Feldman  and
Oren Perez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In designing a recycling policy, the regulator must choose among multiple instruments. Our study seeks to address the linkages between the choice of regulatory instruments and institutional frameworks, people's intrinsic motivation, and various attitudinal measures. We examined the behavioral repercussions of several instruments that are used widely in recycling regulation, using an experimental survey on a representative sample of the Israeli population (N = 1,800 participants). Our findings suggest that the design of recycling policies should be sensitive to the framing effects of varied regulatory instruments and to the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on the desirability and efficacy of the law. In particular, we point out the potential regulatory advantage of using deposit schemes over other instruments and of using private organizations as regulatory agents. Drawing on these findings, we discuss the potential value of using differentiated regulatory policies to provide incentives for recycling in societies characterized by broad heterogeneity in levels of intrinsic motivation.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 405 - 442
Copyright
© 2012 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

For financial support, we thank the Israel National Science Foundation. For statistical consulting, we thank Tammy Shterental and Amir Falk. We would like to thank Jacob Nussim, Tsilly Dagan, Barak Medina, as well as the editors and anonymous referees, for helpful comments.

References

Ajzen, Icek. (1991) “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” 50 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anik, Lalin, et al. (2009) “Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior,” Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper No. 10-012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444831 (accessed 4 April 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Dan, Bracha, Anat, & Meier, Stephan (2009) “Doing Good or Doing Well: Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially,” 99 American Economic Rev. 544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Dan, Huber, Joel, & Wertenbroch, Klaus (2005) “When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains?,” 42 J. of Marketing Research 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Dan (2008) Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, & Tirole, Jean (2006) “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior,” 96 American Economic Rev. 1652–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, Theodore C., Garratt, Rodney J., & Sheehan-Connor, Damien (2009) “One Chance in a Million: Altruism and the Bone Marrow Registry,” 99 American Economic Rev. 1309–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrens, Robert P., et al. (2003) “The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research: A Comparison of Telephone and Internet Samples,” 11 Political Analysis 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Richard, & Jun, Joosung (2005) “Earmarking in Theory and Korean Practice,” International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Working Paper 05–15, June 2005.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel (2008) “Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine ‘The Moral Sentiments’: Evidence from Economic Experiments,” 320 Science 1605–1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, Zach, Chiu, Andrew, & Wu, George (2010) “Overweighting of Small Probabilities,” in Cochran, James J., ed., Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, Kevin M., Darley, John M., & Robinson, Paul H. (2002) “Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment,” 83 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 284–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, Ann E. (2001) “Recycling Norms,” 89 California Law Rev. 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Linchiat, & Krosnick, Jon A. (2009) “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet,” 73 Public Opinion Q. 641–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, Hayley H., et al. (2008) “Will Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection,” 84 Land Economics 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, Robert (2000) “Three Effects of Social Norms on Law: Expression, Deterrence, and Internalization,” 79 Oregon Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Croci, Edoardo, et al. (2005) “Analysing the Effectiveness of an Environmental Voluntary Agreement: The Case of the Australian National Packaging Covenant,” in Croci, Edoardo, ed., The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Young, Raymond (1993) “Changing Behavior and Making It Stick,” 25 Environment and Behavior 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, Edward L. (2000) “The What and Why of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” 11 Psychological Inquiry 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drory, Amos, & Vigoda-Gadot, Eran (2010) “Organizational Politics and Human Resource Management: A Typology and the Israeli Experience,” 20 Human Resource Management Rev. 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. (2001) “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence,” 23 Political Behavior 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ela, Jed S. (2009) “Law and Norms in Collective Action: Maximizing Social Influence to Minimize Carbon Emissions,” 27 UCLA J. of Enviornmental Law & Policy 93.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1998) “New Institutions for Old Neighborhoods,” 48 Duke Law J. 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPA (2001) The U.S. Experience with Economic Incentives for Protecting the Environment. Washington, D.C.: EPA.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, & Lobel, Orly (2010) “The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality,” 88 Texas Law Rev. 1151.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, & Perez, Oren (2009) “How Law Changes the Environmental Mind: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Legal Norms on Moral Perceptions and Civic Enforcement,” 36 J. of Law and Society 501–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval (2007) “Attitudes and Behavior,” in Clark, D. S., ed., Encyclopedia of Law & Society: American and Global Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval (2009) “The Expressive Function of Trade Secret Law: Legality, Cost, Intrinsic Motivation, and Consensus,” 6 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festre, Agnès Festré, & Garrouste, Pierre (2007) Self-Determination and Incentives: A New Look at the Crowding Out Effect (Mimeo, University of Paris).Google Scholar
Fogarty, Helen (2008) International Review of Recycling Policies. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. (1999) “Morality and Rationality in Environmental Policy,” 22 J. of Consumer Policy 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., & Jegen, Reto (1999) “Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence,” Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 26.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., & Jegen, Reto (2001) “Motivation Crowding Theory,” 15 J. of Economic Surveys 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., & Stutzer, Alois (2006) “Environmental Morale and Motivation,” IERE Working Paper No. 288.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Greg, et al. (2009) Environment Protection Amendment (Beverage Container Deposit and Recovery Scheme) Bill 2009. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Parliamentary Services.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, Sumantra, & Moran, Peter (1995) “Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory,” Academy of Management J.—Best Papers Proceedings 1995 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., & Spence, Lester Kenyatta (2005) “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment,” 58 Political Research Q. 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, & Rustichini, Also (2000) “A Fine Is a Price,” 29 J. of Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeschl, Timo, & Perino, Grischa (2009) “Instrument Choice and Motivation: Evidence from a Climate Change Experiment,” CBESS Discussion Paper 09-05, University of East Anglia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D., et al. (2004) “Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions about Internet Questionnaires,” 59 American Psychologist 93–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groth, Markus (2008) “A Review of the German Mandatory Deposit for One-way Drinks Packaging and Drinks Packaging Taxes in Europe,” University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics No. 87, June 2008. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/28207/1/572960956.PDF (accessed 9 April 2012) ISSN 1860-5508.Google Scholar
Guagnano, Gregory A., Stern, Paul C., & Dietz, Thomas (1995) “Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships,” 27 Environment and Behavior 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, Ralf, et al. (2006) “Justifications and Self-Organization as Determinants of Recycling Behavior: The Case of Used Batteries,” 47 Resources, Conservation and Recycling 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörisch, Hannah, & Strassmair, Christina (2008) “An Experimental Test of the Deterrence Hypothesis,” 2008-4 Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge. Available at: http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2139/ (accessed 9 April 2012).Google Scholar
Hunter, Susan, & Leyden, Kevin M. (1995) “Beyond NIMBY,” 23 Policy Studies J. 601–19.Google Scholar
Jolls, Christine, & Sunstein, Cass R. (2006) “Debiasing through Law,” 35 The J. of Legal Studies 199–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan. (2010) “Fixing the Communications Failure,” 463 Nature 296–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahan, Dan M., Jenkins-Smith, Hank, & Braman, Donald (2010) “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus,” 14 J. of Risk Research 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Matthew E. (2007) “Do Greens Drive Hummers or Hybrids? Environmental Ideology as a Determinant of Consumer Choice,” 54 J. of Environmental Economics and Management 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Matthew E., & Vaughn, Ryan K. (2009) “Green Market Geography: The Spatial Clustering of Hybrid Vehicles and LEED Registered Buildings,” 9 The B.E. J. of Economic Analysis & Policy 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, Mwangi S., Lee, Dwight R., & Tollison, Robert D. (1990) “Efficient Lobbying and Earmarked Taxes,” 18 Public Finance Rev. 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Michael S. (2004) “Alternative Sanctions and the Federal Tax Law: Symbols, Shaming, and Social Norm Management as a Substitute for Effective Tax Policy,” 89 Iowa Law Rev. 863.Google Scholar
Koenigs, Michael, & Tranel, Daniel (2007) “Irrational Economic Decision-Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game,” 27 The J. of Neuroscience 951–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraft, Michael E., & Clary, Bruce B. (1991) “Citizen Participation and the NIMBY Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal,” 44 Political Research Q. 299.Google Scholar
Locke, Richard, et al. (2007) “Beyond Corporate Codes of Conduct: Work Organization and Labour Standards at Nike's Suppliers,” 146 International Labour Rev. 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Brad, & Driscoll, Cathy (2008) “Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions,” 77 J. of Business Ethics 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, Edward J., & Baron, Jonathan (2006) “Thinking about Tax,” 12 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 106–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, Edward J., & Baron, Jonathan (2004) “Framing and Taxation: Evaluation of Tax Policies Involving Household Composition,” 25 J. of Economic Psychology 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, Edward J., et al. (1995) “Framing the Jury: Cognitive Perspectives on Pain and Suffering Awards,” 81 Virginia Law Rev. 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, James E. (2002) Recycling Computers and Electronic Equipment: Legislative and Regulatory Approaches for “E-Waste.” Report for Congress.Google Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. (2000) “Norms, Legitimacy and Law Enforcement,” 79 Oregon Law Rev. 391–416.Google Scholar
Mellstrom, Carl, & Johannesson, Magnus (2008) “Crowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?,” 6 J. of the European Economic Association 845–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, Victor (1998) “Norms and Networks in Economic and Organizational Performance,” 88 American Economic Rev. 85.Google Scholar
Nordlund, Annika M., & Garvill, Jörgen (2002) “Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior,” 34 Environment and Behavior 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novemsky, Nathan, & Kahneman, Daniel (2005) “The Boundaries of Loss Aversion,” 42 J. of Marketing Research 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterloh, Margit, Frey, Bruno S., & Frost, Jetta (2001) “Managing Motivation, Organization and Governance,” 5 J. of Management and Governance 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. (1999) “Coping with the Tragedies of the Commons,” 2 Annual Rev. of Political Science 493–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Oren, Amichai-Hamburger, Yair, & Shterental, Tammy (2009) “The Dynamic of Corporate Self-Regulation: ISO 14001, Environmental Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 593–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillutla, Madan M., & Murnighan, J. Keith (1996) “Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers,” 68 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raines, Susan Summers. (2003) “Perceptions of Legitimacy and Efficacy in International Environmental Management Standards: The Impact of the Participation Gap,” 3 Global Environmental Politics 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise (2008) “The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State,” 56 American J. of Comparative Law 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, John M., Darley, Kevin M., & Carlsmith, Paul H. (2001) “The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 165–189.Google Scholar
Rocha, Hector O., & Ghoshal, Sumantra (2006) “Beyond Self-Interest Revisited,” 43 The J. of Management Studies 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Richard M., & Deci, Edward L. (2000) “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation,” 55 Social Development, and Well-Being 68–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Santos, Filipe M., & Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (2005) “Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization,” 16 Organization Science 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautter, John, et al. (2011) “Farmers' Decisions Regarding Carbon Sequestration: A Metaeconomic View,” 24 Society and Natural Resources 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter B., Peterson, Mark F., & Schwartz, Shalom H. (2002) “Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance, and Their Relevance to Managerial Behavior,” 33 J. of Cross-Cultural Psychology 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steg, Linda, & Vlek, Charles (2009) “Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda,” 29 J. of Environmental Psychology 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (2002) “Probability Neglect: Emotions, Worst Cases, and Law,” 112 Yale Law J. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (2003) “What's Available—Social Influences and Behavioral Economics,” 97 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1295–1314.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Claire (2011) “RFID Tracks Recycling Progress in Charleston County,” RFID Journal August 2011. http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/8726 (accessed 4 April 2012).Google Scholar
Tal, Alon (2002) Pollution in a Promised Land: An Environmental History of Israel. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ThØgersen, John (1994) “Monetary Incentives and Environmental Concern. Effects of a Differentiated Garbage Fee,” 17 J. of Consumer Policy 407–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ThØgersen, John (2003) “Monetary Incentives and Recycling: Behavioural and Psychological Reactions to a Performance-Dependent Garbage Fee,” 26 J. of Consumer Policy 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tojo, Naoko (2010) “Europe as a Recycling Society: Recycling Policies for Selected Waste Streams in EEA Member Countries,” ETC/SCP working paper 6/2010.Google Scholar
Turaga, Rama Mohana R., Howarth, Richard B., & Borsuk, Mark E. (2010) “Pro-environmental Behavior,” 1185 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 211–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, & Fox, Craig R. (1995) “Weighing Risk and Uncertainty,” 102 Psychological Rev. 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006) “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation,” 57 Annual Rev. of Psychology 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenbergh, Michael P. (2005) “Order without Social Norms: How Personal Norm Activation Can Protect the Environment,” 99 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1101.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip, Huber, Joel, & Bell, Jason (2011) “Promoting Recycling: Private Values, Social Norms, and Economic Incentives,” 101 American Economic Rev. 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, Antoinette A., Rost, Katja, & Osterloh, Margit (2007) “Crowding-Out of Intrinsic Motivation—Opening the Black Box,” SSRN eLibrary.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Michael (2005) “Motivation or Rationalisation? Causal Relations between Ethics, Norms and Tax Compliance,” 26 J. of Economic Psychology 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Carol M., et al. (1995) “Commitment, Behavior, and Attitude Change: An Analysis of Voluntary Recycling,” 15 J. of Environmental Psychology 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar