Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T16:25:49.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legally Queer: The Construction of Sexuality in LGBQ Asylum Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Stefan Vogler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using court decisions, interviews with legal actors, and ethnographic observations, this paper analyzes the development of sexual identity classifications for sexual minorities seeking asylum in the United States and argues that the adjudication of such claims works to consolidate and regulate sexual identities but also creates possibilities for recognizing marginalized queer identities. Asylum seekers must prove their sexual identities, and immigration officials must classify claimants as belonging to a protected group. At the inception of queer asylum law in 1990, protected categories were highly circumscribed, but the indeterminacy of the law allowed advocates and asylum seekers to challenge existing categories and stake out new claims based on their sexualities. Against the backdrop of extant criticisms of the asylum process for queers, this paper suggests that the way asylum law has been elaborated, adapted, and interpreted, particularly in approximately the past decade, offers possibilities for making unique identity claims that are not recognized in existing scholarship.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 856 - 889
Copyright
© 2016 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Anker, Deborah, & Ardalan, Sabi (2012) “Escalating Persecution of Gays and Refugee Protection,” 44 NYU J. of International Law and Politics 528–58.Google Scholar
Ashford, Chris (2011) “Sexualities and the Law,” 14 Sexualities 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, Scott, et al., eds. (2009) Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Berg, Laurie, & Millbank, Jenni (2009) “Constructing the Personal Narrative of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Asylum Claimants,” 22 J. of Refugee Studies 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Susan A. (2009) “Production and Reproduction of Gender and Sexuality in Legal Discourses of Asylum in the United States,” 34 Signs 659–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Elizabeth, & Schaffner, Laurie, eds. (2005) Regulating Sex: The Politics of Intimacy and Identity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Mary (1997) “Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement,” 103 American J. of Sociology 531–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Mary, et al. (2009) “The Challenge of Law: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Social Movements,” in Barclay, S. et al., eds., Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary, & Taylor, Verta, eds. (2013) The Marrying Kind: Debating Same-Sex Marriage within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, & Amy, Shuman (2007) “Producing Epistemologies of Ignorance in the Political Asylum Process,” 14 Identities 603–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canaday, Margot (2003) ““Who Is a Homosexual?” : The Consolidation of Sexual Identities in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Immigration Law,” 28 Law & Social Inquiry 351–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canaday, Margot (2009) The Straight State. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantú, Lionel (2005) “Well-Founded Fear: Political Asylum and the Boundaries of Sexual Identity in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands,” in Luibheid, E., & Cantu, L., eds., Queer Migrations: Sexuality, U.S. Citizenship, and Border Crossings. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cantú, Lionel (2009) The Sexuality of Migration. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carrillo, Hector (2002) The Night Is Young: Sexuality in Mexico in the Time of AIDS. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carrillo, Hector (2010) “Immigration and LGBT Rights in the USA: Ironies and Constraints in US Asylum Cases,” in Aggleton, P., & Parker, R., eds., Routledge Handbook of Sexuality, Health and Rights. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean (1985) “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements,” 52 Social Research 663–716.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina, & Herman, Didi (2013) “Up Against the Property Logic of Equality Law: Conservative Christian Accommodation Claims and Gay Rights,” 21 Feminist Legal Studies 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Brad, et al., eds. (2005) Passing Lines: Sexuality and Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven, & Carrillo, Hector (2014) “Immigrant Sexual Citizenship: Intersectional Templates Among Mexican Gay Immigrants to the USA,” 18 Citizenship Studies 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlanger, Howard, et al. (2005) “Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?” 2005 Wisconsin Law Rev. 335–63.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan (1995) “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1990) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gesaman, Krista (2009) “Desperately Seeking Freedom,” Newsweek November 29, 2009,Google Scholar
Goldberg, Suzanne (2002) “On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court,” 81 Oregan Law Review 629–62.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (2007) “Kinds of People: Moving Targets,” 151 Proceedings of the British Academy 285–318.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, et al. (2008) “How Law Rules: Torture, Terror, and the Normative Judgment of Iraqi Judges,” 42 Law & Society Rev. 605–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halley, Janet (1996) “The Status/Conduct Distinction in the 1993 Revisions to Military Anti-Gay Policy: A Legal Archaeology,” 3 GLQ 159–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halley, Janet (1999) Don't: A Reader's Guide to the Military's anti-Gay Policy. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ian, Haney Lopez (2006) White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Fadi (2005) “Punishing Masculinity in Gay Asylum Claims,” 114 Yale Law J. 913–20.Google Scholar
Harbeck, Dorothy (2010) “Asking and Telling: Identity and Persecution in Sexual and/or Gender Orientation Asylum Claims,” 25 Georgetown Immigration Law J. 117–50.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James (1991) The Law of Refugee Status. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hinger, Sarah (2010) “Finding the Fundamental: Shaping Identity in Gender and Sexual Orientation Based Asylum Claims,” 19 Columbia J. of Gender and Law 367–408.Google Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie (1996) Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael, & Llewellyn, Cheryl (2012) “Homosexuality, Gender Nonconformity, and the Neoliberal State,” 59 J. of Homosexuality 1087–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornbluh, Felicia (2011) “Queer Legal History: A Field Grows Up and Comes Out,” 36 Law and Social Inquiry 537–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Rachel (2014) ““Gay? Prove it” : The Politics of Queer Anti-deportation Activism,” 17 Sexualities 958–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luibheid, Eithne (2002) Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marouf, Fatma (2008) “The Emerging Importance of “Social Visibility” in Defining a “Particular Social Group” and Its Potential Impact on Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender,” 27 Yale Law & Policy Rev. 47–106.Google Scholar
Martin, Daniel C., & Yankay, James E. (2014) “Annual Flow Report: Refugees and Asylees 2013.” Washington, DC: Office of Immigration Statistics.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2005) “A Preoccupation with Perversion: The British Response to Refugee Claims on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, 1989-2003,” 14 Social & Legal Studies 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2009a) “From Discretion to Disbelief: Recent Trends in Refugee Determinations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation in Australia and the United Kingdom,” 13 International J. of Human Rights 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millbank, Jenni (2009b) “'The Ring of Truth': A Case Study of Credibility Assessment in Particular Social Group Refugee Determinations,” 21 International J. of Refugee Law 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Alice M. (2005) “Gay Enough: Some Tensions in Seeking the Grant of Asylum and Protecting Global Sexual Diversity,” in Epps, B., et al., eds., Passing Lines: Sexuality and Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Millman, Joel. (2014) “The Battle for Gay Asylum: Why Sexual Minorities Have an Inside Track to a U.S. Green Card,” Wall Street J. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/articles/why-sexual-minorities-have-an-inside-track-to-a-u-s-green-card-1402676258 (accessed 13 June 2014).Google Scholar
Murray, David A.B. (2014) “The (Not So) Straight Story: Queering Migration Narratives of Sexual Orientation and Gendered Identity Refugee Claimants,” 17 Sexualities 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy (2009) What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law and the Making of Race in America. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pfitsch, Hollis (2006) “Homosexuality in Asylum and Constitutional Law: Rhetoric of Acts and Identity,” 15 Law & Sexuality: Rev. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues 59–89.Google Scholar
Prieur, Annick (1998) Mema's House, Mexico City: On Transvestities, Queens, and Machos. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, et al. (2009) Refugee Roulette. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Randazzo, Timothy (2005) “Social and Legal Barriers: Sexual Orientation and Asylum in the United States,” in Luibheid, E., & Cantu, L., eds., Queer Migrations: Sexuality, U.S. Citizenship, and Border Crossings. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, Chandan (2005) “Asian Diasporas, Neoliberalism, and Family: Reviewing the Case for Homosexual Asylum in the Context of Family Rights,” 23 Social Text 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehaag, Sean (2009) “Bisexuals Need Not Apply: A Comparative Appraisal of Refugee Law and Policy in Canada, the United States, and Australia,” 13 International J. of Human Rights 415–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Diane (2004) “Locating Sexualities: From Here to Normality,” 7 Sexualities 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Scheingold, Stuart, eds. (2005) The Worlds Cause Lawyers Make. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, Michael (2013) “Generation LGBQIA,” New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/fashion/generation-lgbtqia.html?smid=pl-share (accessed 9 January 2013).Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1998) Seeing like a State. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky (1990) Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William (1992) “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” 98 American J. of Sociology 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Nayan (2012) Stranger Intimacy: Contesting Race, Sexuality, and the Law in the North American West. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Shuman, Amy, & Bohmer, Carol (2014) “Gender and Cultural Silences in the Political Asylum Process,” 17 Sexualities 939–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegelman, Peter, & Donohue, John (1990) “Studying the Iceberg from its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 1133–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Susan, & Ewick, Patricia (2003) “The Architecture of Authority: The Place of Law in the Space of Science,” in A, Sarat, et al., eds., The Place of Law. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sin, Ray (2015) “Does Sexual Fluidity Challenge Sexual Binaries? The Case of Bisexual Immigrants from 1967-2012,” 18 Sexualities 413–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohoni, Deenesh (2007) “Unsuitable Suitors: Anti-Miscegenation Laws, Naturalization Laws, and the Construction of Asian Identities,” 41 Law & Society Rev. 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southam, Keith (2011) “Who Am I and Who Do You Want Me to Be? Effectively Defining a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Social Group in Asylum Applications,” 86 Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 1363–87.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri (1996) “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography,” in Landry, D., & MacLean, G. eds., The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl F. (2003) Governing Sexuality: The Changing Politics of Citizenship and Law Reform. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian (2010) Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1981) The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2011) “Guidance for Adjudicating Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex Refugee and Asylum Claims.”Google Scholar
Weber, Shannon (2012) “What's Wrong with Be(com)ing Queer? Biological Determinism as Discursive Queer Hegemony,” 15 Sexualities 679–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zylan, Yvonne (2011) States of Passion: Law, Identity, and the Construction of Desire. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Ali v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 478 (2nd Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
Amanfi v. Ashcroft, 328 F.3d 719 (3rd Cir. 2003).Google Scholar
Boer-Sedano v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
Comparan v. Gonzales, 144 Fed. Appx. 673 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Hassani v. Mukasey, 301 Fed. Appx. 602 (9th Cir. 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987).Google Scholar
Karouni v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Maldonado v. Attorney General of the United States, 188 Fed. Appx. 101 (3rd Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
Matter of Acosta, U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals (1985), Interim decision 2986.Google Scholar
Matter of Toboso-Alfonso, U.S Board of Immigration Appeals (1990), Interim decision 3222.Google Scholar
Pena-Torres v. Gonzales, 128 Fed. Appx. 628 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Pozos v. Gonzales, 141 Fed. Appx. 629 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Razkane v. Holder, 562 F.3d 1283 (10th Cir. 2009).Google Scholar
Shahinaj v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 1027 (8th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
Soto Vega v. Gonzales, 183 Fed. Appx. 627 (9th Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
Todorovic v. U.S. Attorney General, 621 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2010).Google Scholar