We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Against progress: Intellectual property and fundamental values in the internet age. By Jessica Silbey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2022. 448 pages, $90.00 hardcover/$30.00 paperback.
Review products
Against progress: Intellectual property and fundamental values in the internet age. By Jessica Silbey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2022. 448 pages, $90.00 hardcover/$30.00 paperback.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
01 January 2024
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Chon, Margaret. 1993. “Postmodern 'Progress': Reconsidering the Copyright and Patent Power.” DePaul Law Review43: 97–146.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael, and Eisenberg, Rebecca. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.” Science280: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, Malla. 2004. “The Democratic Public Domain: Reconnecting the Modern First Amendment and the Original Progress Clause (A.K.A. Copyright and Patent Clause).” Jurimetrics45: 23–40.Google Scholar
Rose, Simone. 2013. “The Supreme Court and Patents: Moving Toward a Postmodern Vision of 'Progress'?” Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal23: 1197–1247.Google Scholar
Silbey, Jessica. 2015. The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
Stallman, Richard. 2013. “Patent Law Is, at Best, Not Worth Keeping.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal45: 389–399.Google Scholar