Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:43:31.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Writing Human Rights History—And Social Science Encounters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This review essay on Aryeh Neier's The International Human Rights Movement: A History (Princeton University Press, 2012) discusses Neier's central themes: the origins and maturation of the movement and its effects, including the expansion of human rights and humanitarian law, enhanced criminal accountability for human rights crimes, and the appearance of criminal tribunals, culminating in the International Criminal Court. An overview is interspersed by imaginary conversations between Neier and scholars who speak to his themes, especially legal scholar Jenny Martinez, political scientists Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, historians Devin Pendas and Tomaz Jardim, and sociologists John Hagan, Daniel Levy, Natan Sznaider, Joachim Savelsberg, and Ryan D. King. Linking a practitioner's account with scholarly analyses yields some benefits of “Pasteur's Quadrant.”

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alexander, Jeffrey. 2004. On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The “Holocaust” from War Crime to Trauma Drama. In Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, ed. Alexander, J. C. et al., 196263. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 1990. Punishment in Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel M., eds. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 2004. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in The Hague Tribunal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2005. Crimes of War and the Force of Law. Social Forces 83:14991534.Google Scholar
Jardim, Tomaz. 2012. The Mauthausen Trial: American Military Justice in Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kausikan, Bilahari. 1993. Asia's Different Standard. Foreign Policy Fall:2441.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Without Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel, and Sznaider, Natan. 2010. Human Rights and Memory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Marrus, Michael R. 2008. The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial and the Limitations of Context. In Atrocities on Trial, ed. Heberer, Patricia and Matthäus, Jürgen, 103122. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny S. 2012. The Slave Trade and the Origins of the International Human Rights Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 1979. Defending My Enemy: American Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, and the Risks of Freedom. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 2012. The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. 2006. The Frankfurt Aschwitz Trial, 19631965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. 2012. Toward a New Politics: On the Recent Historiography on Human Rights. Contemporary European History 21 (1): 95111.Google Scholar
Roth, Kenneth. 2004. Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. Human Rights Quarterly 26 (1): 6373.Google Scholar
Rusche, Georg, and Kirchheimer, Otto. [1939] 2003. Punishment and Social Structure, with a new introduction by Dario Melossi. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2010. Crime and Human Rights: Criminology of Genocide and Atrocities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and King, Ryan D. 2005. Institutionalizing Collective Memories of Hate: Law and Law Enforcement in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology 111 (2): 579616.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and King, Ryan D. 2011. American Memories: Atrocities and the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David. 2012. All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schrager, Laura Shill, and Short, James F. 1980. How Serious a Crime: Perceptions of Organizational and Common Crimes. In White-Collar Crime, ed. Geis, Gilbert and Stotland, Ezra, 1431. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sen, Armatya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 2008. Punishment and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Somerset v. Stewart, of 1772, 20 State Tr 1.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Basic Law (Grundgesetz or quasi-constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany), 23. Mai 1949 (BGBl. p. 1), last changed via law of 21. Juli 2010 (BGBl. I p. 944)Google Scholar
Foreign Slave Trade Act, 47 Geo III Sess. 1 c. 36, Act of Parliament, United Kingdom, of 25 March 1807.Google Scholar