Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:49:50.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Laws Work Pretty Well, but Not Great: Words and Rules in Legal Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Lawrence M. Solan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 243 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, Diana, and Terence, Langendoen D., eds. 1997. Optimality Theory: An Overview. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Sharon L., Lila Gleitman, R., and Gleitman, Henry. 1983. What Some Concepts Might Not Be. Cognition 13:263–308.Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 1990. Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brewer, Scott. 2000. Logic in the Intellectual Kingdom of Law: Rethroning Deduction. Manuscript. Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Campos, Paul F. 1995. This Is Not a Sentence. Washington University Law Quarterly 73:971–82.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L. Elizabeth Bates, A., Hohnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico, and Plunkett, Kim. 1996. Rethinking Innateness. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 1994. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., and Pylyshyn, Zenon W. 1988. Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis. In Special Issue: Connections and Symbols, ed. Pinker, Steven and Mehler, Jacques, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, Bradford Books, 3–71.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1992. Foundations of Generative Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, Hiroko, Ito, Takane, Sugioka, Yoko, and Kawamura, Kitsuru. 1999. Neurolinguistic Evidence for Rule-Based Nominal SuMixation. Language 75:739–63.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael. 1997. Optimality Theory and Prosody. In Archangeli and Langendoen 1997, 33–;58.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene, and Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Jeffrey P., and Georgia Green, M. 1995. Grammar and Inferences of Rationality in Interpreting the Child Pornography Statute. Washington University Law Quarterly 73:1223–51.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Kim, John J., Pinker, Steven, Prince, Alan, and Prasada, Sandeep. 1991. Why No Mere Mortal Has Ever Flown out to Center Field. Cognitive Science 15:173–218.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Pinker, Steven, Ullman, Michael, Hollander, Michelle, John Rosen, T., and Xu, Fei. 1992. Overregularization in Language Acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 57, no. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Brinkmann, Ursula, Clashen, Harald, Wiese, Richard, and Pinker, Steven. 1995. German Inflection: The Exception that Proves the Rule. Cognitive Psychology 29:189–256.Google Scholar
Medin, Douglas L., Wattenmaker, William D., and Sarah Hampson, E. 1987. Family Resemblance, Conceptual Cohesiveness, and Category Construction. Cognitive Psychology 19:242–79.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. 1996. Contextuality. In Mental Models in Cognitive Science: Essays in Honour of Phil Johnson-Laird, ed. Oakhill, Jane and Garnham, Alan, 1–18. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1990. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S., and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Consmint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report no. 2. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104:192–233.Google Scholar
Rummelhart, David E., and James McClelland, L. 1986. On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs. In Psychological and Biological Models. Vol. 2 of Parallel Distributed Processing: Explanations in the Microstructure of Cognition, ed. James McClelland, L., David Rummelhart, E., and the PDP Research Group. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph. 2001. Kumho and How We Know. Law and Cotemporary Problems, vol. 64. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1989. The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules. University of Chicago Law Review 56:1175–88.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin 1997. A Matter of Interpretation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the Rules. 1991. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre. 1999. No Vehicles in the Park. Seattle University Law Review 23:381–89.Google Scholar
Simon, Dan. 1998. A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision Making. Rutgers Law Journal 30:1–142.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Sloman, Steven. 1996. The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119:3–22.Google Scholar
Smith, Edward E. 1995. Concepts and Categorization. In An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 3, Thinking, ed. Smith, Edward and Daniel Osherson, N. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, Bradford Books Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1999. Chomsky: Idem and Ideals. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 1993. The Language of Judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 1997. Learning Our Limits: The Decline of Textualism in Statutory Cases. Wisconsin Law Review 1997:235–3.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 1998. Law, Language and Lenity. William and Mary Law Review 40:57–144.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the Rights Revolution. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, Michael, et al. 1997. A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence That the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and That Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9:289–99.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. 1989. Transcendental Nonsense, Metaphoric Reasoning, and the Cognitive Stakes for Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137:1105–1237.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. Forthcoming. A Clearing in the Forest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar