Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:41:48.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What's Wrong with “Negative Liberty”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Extract

On 5 January 1879, the Chicago Tribune published an interview with Karl Marx that had been conducted in London a few weeks earlier. In the course of the interview Marx clarified the platform of the International Society as it had been established at Gotha in 1875. The platform was a litany of liberal reforms: universal male suffrage in all elections, popular referenda on issues of war and peace, the abolition of a standing army matched by universal military duty, the abolition of all laws regulating the press and public assemblies, free legal counsel and jury trials, universal public education, freedom of science and religion, a progressive income tax, legal restrictions on the length of the working day, the abolition of child labor, sanitary laws guaranteeing the safety of the living and working conditions of labor, and restrictions on prison labor.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I've stolen my title from Charles Taylor, 2 Philosophy and the Humman Sciences: Philosophical Papers 211–29 (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar

2 Abraham, David, “Liberty without Equality: The Property-Rights Connection in a ‘Negative Citizenship’ Regime,” 21 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1 (1996).Google Scholar

3 See Tuck, Richard, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge, 1979)Google Scholar