Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T14:25:12.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of Reconciliation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jens Meierhenrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years scholars from neighboring disciplines have emphasized the importance of conceptual rigor in designing, administering, and interpreting research in the social sciences. Drawing on this new conceptualism, this article analyzes the much talked about notion of “reconciliation.” In an effort at structuring a useful debate on possible departures from historic injustice, the article formulates a systematized concept of reconciliation based on the multitude of meanings contained in theory and practice. It distinguishes varieties of reconciliation, organizing these varieties into types and subtypes. The article argues that while most varieties of reconciliation emanate from the same root concept, the various outer layers of meaning do not overlap. This hampers not only our understanding of reconciliation, but its promotion in the international system as well. In response to this methodological malaise, the article prescribes friendly amendments—conceptual modifications and refinements designed to increase measurement validation of reconciliation as a conceptual variable.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , Winter 2008 , pp. 195 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95:529–46.Google Scholar
Adler, Jacob. 1990. Murphy and Mercy. Analysis 50:262–68.Google Scholar
American Arbitration Association. 2002. ADR and the Law. 18th ed. New York: American Arbitration Association.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics. 1998. Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 9, Winter.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. 1993. Some Doubts about Restorative Justice. Criminal Law Forum 4:277–99.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm. 1989. Law and Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Norway. In History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, ed. Starr, June and Collier, Jane F. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm. [ 1969] 1997. Law as a Way of Resolving Conflicts: The Case of a Small Industrialized Society. In Law in Culture and Society, ed. Laura Nader. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Yehudith. 2004. The Role of Forgiveness in Reconciliation. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov. 2004. From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1990. Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps. Studies in Comparative International Development 25:7–24.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. 2002. Reconciliation after Ethnic Cleansing: Listening, Retribution, Affiliation. Public Culture 14:281–304.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. 1993. Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of the World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement. Modern Law Review 56:282–96.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1972. On Mercy. Philosophical Review 81:182–207.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 2002. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Adcock, Robert. 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science 2:537–65.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49:430–51.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E. Jr. 1993. Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 87:845–55.Google Scholar
Cooley, John W. 1986. Arbitration vs. Mediation—Explaining the Differences. Judicature 69:263–69.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M., and Procopé, J. F., eds. 1995. Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1999. Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics. Comparative Politics 31:465–76.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Digeser, Peter. 1998. Forgiveness and Politics: Dirty Hands and Imperfect Procedures. Political Theory 26:700–24.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. 1990. Hating Criminals: How Can Something That Feels So Good Be Wrong? Michigan Law Review 88:1448–73.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [ 1938] 1964. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Du Preez, Max. 2001. Too Many Truths to Tell. Sunday Independent (Johannesburg), June 24.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Susan. 1999. Reconciliation for Realists. Ethics & International Affairs 13:81–98.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Laurel L., and Weinstein, Harvey M. 2002. Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly 24:573–639.Google Scholar
Foster, George M. 1967. Tzintzuntzan: Mexican Peasants in a Changing World. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1986. The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases. Judicature 69:256–62.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant. 1982. The Movement toward Procedural Informalism in North America and Western Europe: A Critical Survey. In The Politics of Informal Justice, Volume 2: Comparative Studies, ed. Abel, Richard L. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2004. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Glasser, Cyril, and Roberts, Simon. 1993. Dispute Resolution: Civil Justice and Its Alternatives. Modern Law Review 56:277–79.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1955. The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., and Tilly, Charles, eds. 2006. Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1999. Forgiveness and the Unforgivable. American Philosophical Quarterly 36:59–75.Google Scholar
Gross, Jan T. 2001. Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haaken, Janice. 2002. The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly: Psychoanalytic and Cultural Perspectives on Forgiveness. In Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy, ed. Lamb, Sharon and Murphy, Jeffrie G. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1988. The Retributive Idea. In Forgiveness and Mercy, ed. Murphy, Jeffrie and Hampton, Jean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hestevold, H. Scott. 1985. Justice to Mercy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46:281–91.Google Scholar
Holiday, Anthony. 1998. Forgiving and Forgetting: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa, ed. Nuttall, Sarah and Coetzee, Carli. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 2005. Forgiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sharon, and Murphy, Jeffrie G., eds. 2002. Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambourne, Wendy. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation: Postconflict Peacebuilding in Cambodia and Rwanda. In Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, ed. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lang, Berel. 1994. Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly 31:105–17.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald. 1985. The Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Little, David. 1999. A Different Kind of Justice: Dealing with Human Rights Violations in Transitional Societies. Ethics & International Affairs 13:65–80.Google Scholar
Long, William, and Brecke, Peter. 2003. War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2004. Comparative-Historical Methodology. Annual Review of Sociology 30:81–101.Google Scholar
McGary, Howard. 1989. Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly 26:343–51.Google Scholar
Miller, William Ian. 2006. Eye for An Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 2002. Breaking the Cycles of Hatred: Memory, Law, and Repair. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, Adam. 2004. On Evil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muldrew, Craig. 1996. The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Disputes in Early Modern England. The Historic Journal 39:915–42.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1988. Forgiveness and Resentment. In Forgiveness and Mercy, ed. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jean Hampton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 2003. Getting Even: Forgiveness and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Hampton, Jean. 1988a. Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Hampton, Jean, eds. 1988b. Mercy and Legal Justice. In Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, ed. [ 1969] 1997. Styles of Court Procedure: To Make the Balance. In Law in Culture and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2002a. Moving On—Comprehending Anthropologies of Law. In Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods, ed. Starr, June and Goodale, Mark. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2002b. The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Neu, Jerome. 2002. To Understand All Is to Forgive All—Or Is It? In Before Forgiving: Cautionary Views of Forgiveness in Psychotherapy, ed. Lamb, Sharon and Murphy, Jeffrie G. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1988. Prospects and Policies for Soviet-American Reconciliation. Political Science Quarterly 103:197–222.Google Scholar
North, Joanna. 1987. Wrongdoing and Forgiveness. Philosophy 62:499–508.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nuttall, Sarah, and Coetzee, Carli, eds. 1998. Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polonsky, Antony, and Michlic, Joanna B., eds. 2004. Introduction to Part II. In The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz. 1997. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. 1995. Forgivingness. American Philosophical Quarterly 32:289–306.Google Scholar
Roberts, Simon, and Palmer, Michael. 2005. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, Declan. 2003. Accountability in Restorative Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Steven. 2003. From Reconciliation to Coexistence. Public Culture 15:181–86.Google Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy, and Daly, Erin. 2004. Too Many Questions, Too Few Answers: Reconciliation in Transitional Societies. C olumbia Human Rights Law Review 35:661–728.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64:1033–53.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, ed. 1984. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schimmel, Solomon. 2003. Wounds Not Healed By Time: The Power of Repentance and Forgiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scobie, E. D., and Scobie, G. E. W. 1998. Damaging Events: The Perceived Need for Forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 28:373–401.Google Scholar
Seneca. 1995. On Mercy. In Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, ed. Cooper, John M. and , J. F. Procopé. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A., and Finch, Henry A., eds. 1949. Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shriver, Donald W. 1995. An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Alwynne. 1968. Mercy. Philosophy 43:345–59.Google Scholar
Starr, June, and Collier, Jane F., eds. 1989. History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, June, and Goodale, Mark, eds. 2002. Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Starr, June, and Yngvesson, Barbara. 1975. Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing in on Compromise Decisions. American Ethnologist 2:553–66.Google Scholar
Strang, Heather. 2002. Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Strimling, Andrea. 2002. The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service: A Partner in International Conflict Prevention. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 2:417–43.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. 2003. Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 103:101–32.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. 1999. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, vol. 5. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tutu, Desmond. 1999. No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Twambley, P. 1976. Mercy and Forgiveness. Analysis 36:84–90.Google Scholar
Ulam, Adam B. 1968. Expansion and Coexistence: The History of Soviet Foreign Policy 1917–67. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
United States Office of Personal Management. n.d. Section I: Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques and Agency Practices. http://www.opm.gov/er/adrguide/Section1-justice.asp (accessed January 10, 2006).Google Scholar
Van, Ness, Daniel, W. 1993. New Wine and Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice. Criminal Law Forum 4:251–76.Google Scholar
Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1904 1949. “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy. In Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences, ed. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A. 2003. Justice and Retribution in Postconflict Settings. Public Culture 15:187–90.Google Scholar