Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:49:17.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Times of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

In this essay, I situate Kunal Parker's Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900, within a broader set of intellectual currents engaged with questions of time and temporality. Although Parker's book centers on the common law and history and develops specific conceptions of time, in so doing, he invites legal historians and legal scholars to ruminate on the times of law, particularly the temporal relations that law has with itself. Placing Parker in conversation with Henri Bergson and the recent Bergsonian revival in critical theory, I suggest that law has a duration, a formulation that opens other itineraries to consider the dynamic times of law.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, Henri [1910] 1994. Matter and Memory. Trans. N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri [1911] 1998. Creative Evolution. Trans. Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri [1946] 2007. The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Mabelle L. Andison. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Darian‐Smith, Eve 1999. Bridging Divides: The Channel Tunnel and English Legal Identity in the New Europe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen 2008. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles 1988. Bergsonism. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles 1999. Bergson's Conception of Difference. In The New Bergson, ed. John, Mullarkey Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L 2010. Law, War, and the History of Time, California Law Review 98: 16691709.Google Scholar
Engel, David M 1987. Law, Time, and Community. Law and Society Review 21 (4): 605–38.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter 2001. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, Rebecca R 2001. Time in the Law. University of Colorado Law Review 72: 663748.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 1990. Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J 1996. A Moment's Notice: Time Politics Across Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 2004. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Suzanne 2006. Thinking in Time: An Introduction to Henri Bergson. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1991. The Common Law. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn 2008. Measuring Time, Making History. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean 2003. Various Aspects of Memory in Bergson. In The Challenge of Bergsonism in Leonard Lawlor. Trans. Athena V. Coleman. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W 1999. The Cultural Study of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Alexandre 2008. The Image of Law, Bergson, Spinoza. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Alexandre 2009. The Time of Law: Evolution in Holmes and Bergson. In Deleuze and Law: Forensic Futures, ed. Rosi, Braidotti, Claire, Colebrook, and Patrick, Hanafin London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mawani, Renisa 2012a. Law's Archive. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 337–65.Google Scholar
Mawani, Renisa 2012b. Specters of Indigeneity in British Indian Migration, 1914. Law and Society Review 46 (2): 369403.Google Scholar
Mawani, Renisa 2014. Law as Temporality: Colonial Politics and Indian Settlers. UC Irvine Law Review 4(1): 6595.Google Scholar
Parker, Kunal M 2011a. Common Law, History, and Democracy in Early America, 1790–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Kunal M 2011b. Law “In” and “As” History: The Common Law in the American Polity, 1790–1900. Irvine Law Review 1 (3): 587609.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2007. The Threepenny Constitution (and the Question of Justice). Alabama Law Review 58: 9791008.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2009. Revolutionary Justice in Brecht, Conrad, and Blake. Law and Literature 21 (2): 185213.Google Scholar