Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:32:12.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Coase Seriously: Neil Komesar on Law's Limits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Daniel H. Cole
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on Law and Economics
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Winter 2004 , pp. 261 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, Masashiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. [1951] 1970. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Been, Vicki. 1991. ”Exit” as a Constraint on Land Use Exactions: Rethinking the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine. Columbia Law Review 91:473–545.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W., ed. 1992. Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed, A. Douglas. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85:1089–128.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4:386–405.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics 2:1–40.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1964. Discussion: The Regulated Industries. American Economic Review 54:194–95.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1984. The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140:229–31.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. 2002. Pollution and Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economics Review (Papers and Proceedings) 57:347–59.Google Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, and Krier, James E. 2002. Property. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. Property in Land. Yale Law Journal 102:1315–400.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1994. On the Optimal Mix of Private and Common Property. In Frankel Paul, Miller, and Paul 1994.Google Scholar
Fischel, William. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, William. 1995. Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Frankel, Ellen, Fred D. Miller Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey, eds. 1994. Property Rights. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 1994. Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies. Journal of Political Economy 102:912–50.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–48.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1990. The First Great Law and Economics Movement. Stanford Law Review 42:993–1058.Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon, and Schleifer, Andri. 1999. Coase v. the Coasians. Harvard Institute of Economics Research Paper No. 1885.Google Scholar
Komesar, Neil K. 1994. Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James. [1787] 1961. Federalist No. 10. In Rossiter 1961.Google Scholar
Mercuro, Nicholas, and Medema, Steven G. 1997. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modemism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1991. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law–Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton, ed. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Glenn G. 1991. Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar